ECCouncil 312-50v13 - Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEHv13)

The KRACK (Key Reinstallation Attack) vulnerability is a critical WPA2 flaw covered extensively in CEH v13 Wireless Network Hacking. KRACK exploits weaknesses in the four-way handshake process, allowing attackers to force reinstallation of encryption keys.

This key reinstallation resets nonces and counters, enabling attackers to decrypt, replay, and forge packets, even on encrypted WPA2 networks. CEH v13 highlights that KRACK does not break encryption mathematically but exploits protocol logic flaws.

Hole196 affects GTK misuse, and WPS PIN attacks target authentication, not replay of encrypted traffic. Weak RNG issues are unrelated to WPA2 replay.

Thus, Option B is correct.

In CEH v13 Module 01: Introduction to Ethical Hacking, the types of law applicable to cybersecurity incidents are discussed. When executives fail to protect their company’s information systems and this leads to financial loss, data breaches, or negligence, the resulting liability is considered under civil law.

Civil law deals with non-criminal disputes such as negligence, liability, and contractual breaches.

A company or affected party may file a civil lawsuit for damages.

Executives can be held civilly liable for failing in their duty of care, especially when regulations like GDPR, SOX, or HIPAA are involved.

SSL/TLS is a protocol that provides encryption and authentication for data in transit between a client and a server. However, SSL/TLS does not provide any protection against data tampering, which is the alteration, deletion, or insertion of data without authorization or proper validation. Data tampering can compromise the integrity and accuracy of the data, and potentially lead to breaches or fraud. To detect and prevent data tampering, you should implement IPsec in addition to SSL/TLS. IPsec is a protocol that provides encryption, authentication, and integrity for data in transit at the network layer. IPsec uses cryptographic mechanisms, such as digital signatures and hash-based message authentication codes (HMACs), to verify the identity of the sender and the receiver, and to ensure that the data has not been modified during transmission. IPsec can also provide replay protection, which prevents an attacker from retransmitting old or duplicate packets. By combining SSL/TLS and IPsec, you can achieve a higher level of security and reliability for your cloud-based application. References:

EC-Council CEHv13 Courseware Module 18: Cryptography, page 18-20

EC-Council CEHv13 Courseware Module 19: Cloud Computing, page 19-29

A comprehensive guide to data tampering

Tamper Detection

WS-Security (Web Services Security) is a protocol specification that provides a means for securing SOAP-based messages. It defines how to add authentication, encryption, and digital signatures to SOAP headers, helping ensure message integrity and confidentiality.

According to CEH v13 Official Courseware:

WS-Security is an extension of SOAP.

It supports features such as:

Authentication via tokens (e.g., username, X.509)

Message integrity via digital signatures

Message confidentiality via XML encryption

Incorrect Options:

A. WSDL (Web Services Description Language) describes the web service interface but does not provide security.

B. WS Work Processes is not a defined web service security standard.

C. WS-Policy allows expressing security requirements, but enforcement is handled by WS-Security.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: "Web Services Security"

Subsection: "WS-* Standards"

=

The CEH Web Application Security module explains that race conditions occur when systems improperly handle simultaneous requests, leading to unexpected behavior. In token-based authentication systems, poor synchronization between token expiration checks and validation logic can allow attackers to exploit timing gaps.

The observed pattern—failed attempts with expired tokens followed by successful access—suggests the attacker exploited a race condition where the application inconsistently validated token state.

Option C is correct.

Option A would not involve expired tokens.

Option B is highly impractical given secure token entropy.

Option D typically succeeds without repeated failures.

CEH highlights race conditions as subtle but dangerous logic flaws.

Dynamic ARP inspection (DAI) protects switching devices against Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) packet spoofing (also known as ARP poisoning or ARP cache poisoning).

DAI inspects ARPs on the LAN and uses the information in the DHCP snooping database on the switch to validate ARP packets and to protect against ARP spoofing. ARP requests and replies are compared against entries in the DHCP snooping database, and filtering decisions are made based on the results of those comparisons. When an attacker tries to use a forged ARP packet to spoof an address, the switch compares the address with entries in the database. If the media access control (MAC) address or IP address in the ARP packet does not match a valid entry in the DHCP snooping database, the packet is dropped.

The host-based vulnerability assessment (VA) resolution arose from the auditors’ got to periodically review systems. Arising before the net becoming common, these tools typically take an “administrator’s eye” read of the setting by evaluating all of the knowledge that an administrator has at his or her disposal.

Uses

Host VA tools verify system configuration, user directories, file systems, registry settings, and all forms of other info on a number to gain information about it. Then, it evaluates the chance of compromise. it should also live compliance to a predefined company policy so as to satisfy an annual audit. With administrator access, the scans area unit less possible to disrupt traditional operations since the computer code has the access it has to see into the complete configuration of the system.

What it Measures Host

VA tools will examine the native configuration tables and registries to spot not solely apparent vulnerabilities, however additionally “dormant” vulnerabilities – those weak or misconfigured systems and settings which will be exploited when an initial entry into the setting. Host VA solutions will assess the safety settings of a user account table; the access management lists related to sensitive files or data; and specific levels of trust applied to other systems. The host VA resolution will a lot of accurately verify the extent of the danger by determinant however way any specific exploit could also be ready to get.

Types of Vulnerability Assessment Host-based assessments are a type of security check that involve conducting a configuration-level check to identify system configurations, user directories, file systems, registry settings, and other parameters to evaluate the possibility of compromise. 
Host-based scanners assess systems to identify vulnerabilities such as native configuration tables, incorrect registry or file permissions, and software configuration errors. (P.528/512)

The best security practice in this scenario is to implement IEEE 802.1X. This is a port-based Network Access Control (NAC) protocol that provides authentication for devices before they are allowed to transmit traffic on the network. It ensures that only authorized users/devices can access the network through physical (wired) or wireless connections.

CEH v13 Official Courseware states:

“802.1X provides a framework for authenticating and authorizing devices attached to a LAN port, enforcing port-based network access control. It helps prevent unauthorized users from connecting to an internal network, particularly in environments where physical access to network jacks cannot be fully controlled.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Disabling unused ports is a good practice, but students may still use open ports intended for authorized personnel. It does not scale or provide identity-based access control.

B. Separating users in VLANs helps in segmentation, but it does not prevent unauthorized physical access to ports.

D. Asking students to use wireless is administrative, not a technical enforcement measure.

Reference – CEH v13 Guide:

Module 04: Enumeration

Topic: Network Access Control (802.1X) and Switch Port Security

=

CEH covers classical cryptanalytic attacks, including linear cryptanalysis, which uses statistical correlations between plaintext and ciphertext to infer bits of the secret key. If a cipher leaks structural patterns across many data samples, linear approximations can be computed to break the cipher.

This scenario describes Differential Cryptanalysis, a powerful cryptanalytic technique covered in CEH v13 Cryptography. Differential cryptanalysis focuses on analyzing how small changes in plaintext input affect the resulting ciphertext output, with the goal of uncovering patterns related to the secret encryption key.

CEH v13 explains that symmetric algorithms rely on complex transformations—such as substitution and permutation—to obscure relationships between plaintext and ciphertext. However, in some algorithms, predictable differences may propagate through encryption rounds in a way that reveals statistical biases. By carefully selecting pairs of plaintext inputs with controlled differences and comparing the resulting ciphertexts, attackers can infer information about intermediate states and eventually the encryption key.

This method does not attempt every possible key (brute force), nor does it rely on execution timing or system performance metrics (timing attacks). It also differs from chosen-ciphertext attacks, which involve submitting chosen ciphertexts for decryption rather than observing encryption behavior.

Differential cryptanalysis was instrumental in breaking early block ciphers and is a key reason why modern algorithms like AES are designed with resistance to differential attacks. CEH v13 emphasizes that understanding this attack is critical for evaluating the strength of symmetric encryption algorithms and their internal structure.

Therefore, Option A accurately describes the technique being employed.

In CEH v13 Module 02: Footprinting and Reconnaissance, and Module 03: Scanning Networks, several tools and techniques are introduced for analyzing public IP addresses when investigating a security alert.

Let’s evaluate the options:

A. DNS: Domain Name System (DNS) is essential in mapping IPs to domains. Reverse DNS lookups can reveal if the IP is associated with a malicious domain, and forward lookups can confirm legitimacy.

B. Whois: WHOIS records are crucial for identifying IP ownership, registration data, and abuse contacts. It helps assess if the IP belongs to a known threat actor or suspicious hosting provider.

C. Geolocation: Helps you understand where the IP is physically located. If the IP is in a country known for cybercrime or doesn’t match your user's location, it raises red flags.

D. ARP (Address Resolution Protocol): ❌ ARP is local to Layer 2 and works only within a LAN (Local Area Network). ARP cannot resolve or analyze public IP addresses which operate in Layer 3 of the OSI model.

Thus, ARP is the least relevant when analyzing a public IP address, as it deals with MAC-to-IP mapping only in local environments.

CEH incident response material explains that LLMNR and NBT-NS poisoning is a common credential-harvesting technique in internal networks. These legacy name-resolution protocols operate via broadcast queries. Attackers can listen for these broadcasts and respond faster than legitimate DNS/hosts entries, impersonating the requested resource. Once the victim system attempts to authenticate, it sends NTLM hashes to the attacker-controlled machine. Tools like Responder and Inveigh automate this process, enabling attackers to collect challenge-response hashes for offline cracking. CEH highlights that this method is passive from the victim’s viewpoint and difficult to detect unless monitoring tools watch for anomalous LLMNR/NBT-NS responses. Options A, B, and D refer to other components of password cracking, but none describe the mechanism of capturing hashes via poisoned name resolution. The attacker’s technique directly aligns with exploiting the name-resolution protocol to intercept authentication attempts.

https://book.hacktricks.xyz/pentesting-web/csrf-cross-site-request-forgery

Cross-site request forgery (also known as CSRF) is a web security vulnerability that allows an attacker to induce users to perform actions that they do not intend to perform.

This is done by making a logged in user in the victim platform access an attacker controlled website and from there execute malicious JS code, send forms or retrieve "images" to the victims account.

In order to be able to abuse a CSRF vulnerability you first need to find a relevant action to abuse (change password or email, make the victim follow you on a social network, give you more privileges...). The session must rely only on cookies or HTTP Basic Authentication header, any other header can't be used to handle the session. An finally, there shouldn't be unpredictable parameters on the request.

Several counter-measures could be in place to avoid this vulnerability. Common defenses:

- SameSite cookies: If the session cookie is using this flag, you may not be able to send the cookie from arbitrary web sites.

- Cross-origin resource sharing: Depending on which kind of HTTP request you need to perform to abuse the relevant action, you may take int account the CORS policy of the victim site. Note that the CORS policy won't affect if you just want to send a GET request or a POST request from a form and you don't need to read the response.

- Ask for the password user to authorise the action.

- Resolve a captcha

- Read the Referrer or Origin headers. If a regex is used it could be bypassed form example with:

http://mal.net?orig=http://example.com (ends with the url)

http://example.com.mal.net (starts with the url)

- Modify the name of the parameters of the Post or Get request

- Use a CSRF token in each session. This token has to be send inside the request to confirm the action. This token could be protected with CORS.

Promiscuous mode is a configuration for a network interface card (NIC) that allows it to pass all network traffic to the CPU for processing, not just the traffic addressed to that NIC. It is commonly used in:

Network sniffing and monitoring

Packet analysis tools like Wireshark

IDS/IPS systems

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 8: Sniffing

Quote:

“Promiscuous mode allows a NIC to capture all packets on the network segment, regardless of the destination MAC address.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Multicast mode handles group address traffic, not all frames

C. WEM is not a valid network mode term

D. Port forwarding redirects traffic to specific internal IPs

=

CEH v13 defines a white hat hacker as a security professional with explicit authorization to perform penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and exploitation attempts within legal and contractual boundaries. Their objective is to strengthen security, not compromise it. White hats follow structured methodologies, document findings, and provide remediation recommendations. A black hat (Option A) acts maliciously and without permission. A grey hat (Option B) operates without authorization but without harmful intent, which is not compliant with corporate penetration testing procedures. Script kiddies (Option C) rely on pre-built tools without deep knowledge and are not employed for legitimate engagements. Therefore, the individual described is a white hat, operating under legal and ethical guidelines with organizational consent.

Software as a service (SaaS) allows users to attach to and use cloud-based apps over the web. Common examples ar email, calendaring and workplace tool (such as Microsoft workplace 365).

SaaS provides a whole software solution that you get on a pay-as-you-go basis from a cloud service provider. You rent the use of an app for your organisation and your users connect with it over the web, typically with an internet browser. All of the underlying infrastructure, middleware, app software system and app knowledge ar located within the service provider’s knowledge center. The service provider manages the hardware and software system and with the appropriate service agreement, can make sure the availability and also the security of the app and your data as well. SaaS allows your organisation to induce quickly up and running with an app at token upfront cost.

Common SaaS scenarios

This tool having used a web-based email service like Outlook, Hotmail or Yahoo! Mail, then you have got already used a form of SaaS. With these services, you log into your account over the web, typically from an internet browser. the e-mail software system is found on the service provider’s network and your messages ar hold on there moreover. you can access your email and hold on messages from an internet browser on any laptop or Internet-connected device.

The previous examples are free services for personal use. For organisational use, you can rent productivity apps, like email, collaboration and calendaring; and sophisticated business applications like client relationship management (CRM), enterprise resource coming up with (ERP) and document management. You buy the use of those apps by subscription or per the level of use.

Advantages of SaaS

Gain access to stylish applications. to supply SaaS apps to users, you don’t ought to purchase, install, update or maintain any hardware, middleware or software system. SaaS makes even sophisticated enterprise applications, like ERP and CRM, affordable for organisations that lack the resources to shop for, deploy and manage the specified infrastructure and software system themselves.

Pay just for what you utilize. you furthermore may economize because the SaaS service automatically scales up and down per the level of usage.

Use free shopper software system. Users will run most SaaS apps directly from their web browser without needing to transfer and install any software system, though some apps need plugins. this suggests that you simply don’t ought to purchase and install special software system for your users.

Mobilise your hands simply. SaaS makes it simple to “mobilise” your hands as a result of users will access SaaS apps and knowledge from any Internet-connected laptop or mobile device. You don’t ought to worry concerning developing apps to run on differing types of computers and devices as a result of the service supplier has already done therefore. additionally, you don’t ought to bring special experience aboard to manage the safety problems inherent in mobile computing. A fastidiously chosen service supplier can make sure the security of your knowledge, no matter the sort of device intense it.

Access app knowledge from anyplace. With knowledge hold on within the cloud, users will access their info from any Internet-connected laptop or mobile device. And once app knowledge is hold on within the cloud, no knowledge is lost if a user’s laptop or device fails.

In CEH v13 Module 11: Hacking Wireless Networks, antenna types are critical for wireless communications, signal strength, and attack range.

Yagi Antenna

A directional antenna designed to operate in VHF (30 MHz to 300 MHz) and UHF (300 MHz to 3 GHz) frequency bands.

Frequently used for point-to-point communication, such as long-distance Wi-Fi or directional signal monitoring.

Offers high gain, narrow beamwidth, and works well for capturing or projecting signals over long distances.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Dipole antenna: Typically omnidirectional; less gain; not optimized for long-distance VHF/UHF.

C. Parabolic grid antenna: Used in microwave and satellite frequencies; not suited for 10 MHz–VHF.

D. Omnidirectional antenna: Broadcasts in all directions; used in short-range access points.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application_firewall

A web application firewall (WAF) is a specific form of application firewall that filters, monitors, and blocks HTTP traffic to and from a web service. By inspecting HTTP traffic, it can prevent attacks exploiting a web application's known vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), file inclusion, and improper system configuration.

Regional Internet Registries (RIRs):

ARIN (American Registry for Internet Numbers)

AFRINIC (African Network Information Center)

APNIC (Asia Pacific Network Information Center)

RIPE (Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre)

LACNIC (Latin American and Caribbean Network Information Center)

When standard protections such as HTTPS, HTTP-only flags, and session regeneration are properly implemented, CEH teaches that predictable session identifiers become one of the few remaining avenues for session hijacking. Session token prediction involves analyzing entropy, randomness, or generation patterns within session IDs to mathematically infer future or valid tokens. If the application uses weak randomization algorithms, insufficient entropy sources, or predictable sequences, attackers may generate a valid session ID without direct interception. Techniques such as MitM interception or CSRF manipulation do not bypass strong transport-layer protections and cookie restrictions. Session fixation fails because the application regenerates the session ID upon login, invalidating pre-set identifiers. Therefore, the advanced and CEH-aligned method to hijack a protected session is predicting session IDs through side-channel or pattern analysis.