APA AICP - American Institute of Certified Planners Exam

The landmark caseVillage of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.(1926) upheld comprehensive zoning as a constitutional exercise of police power to protect public welfare, establishing zoning’s legal foundation in the U.S. Option C (The Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.) is correct. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “Euclid v. Ambler(1926) validated comprehensive zoning as a constitutional exercise of power.” Option A (Kelo, 2005) dealt with eminent domain. Option B (Mount Laurel, 1975) addressed exclusionary zoning. Option D (Penn Central, 1978) focused on historic preservation. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Euclid v. Ambleris the landmark case affirming zoning’s constitutionality,” supporting option C.

The location quotient (LQ) measures the concentration of an industry in a local area compared to a larger reference area (e.g., the nation). It is calculated as:

LQ = (Local industry share / National industry share).

Here, the town’s education sector share is 25% (0.25), and the national share is 10% (0.10).

LQ = 0.25 / 0.10 = 2.5.

Option B (2.5) is correct, indicating the town has 2.5 times the national concentration of education jobs. Option A (0.25) inverts the ratio. Options C (15) and D (35) are incorrect calculations. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Research and Assessment Methods,” defines the location quotient as “the ratio of a local industry’s share to the national share, used to measure industry concentration.” TheCPC Study Manual(2024) provides an example: “If a town has 25% of jobs in a sector and the nation has 10%, the LQ is 2.5,” supporting option B.

These concepts—separating vehicular and pedestrian circulation, routing through traffic around superblocks, and integrating internal park systems—were pioneered in Radburn, New Jersey, in 1929, a planned community designed by Clarence Stein and Henry Wright. Radburn introduced the “Radburn Idea,” emphasizing pedestrian safety and green spaces within superblocks. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “Radburn, NJ, was the first U.S. community to implement vehicular-pedestrian separation, peripheral through traffic, and internal park systems.” Option A (Columbia) and B (Reston) are later planned communities (1960s) that built on Radburn’s ideas. Option D (Savannah, 1733) used a grid with squares but didn’t implement these concepts. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Radburn introduced these planning principles in 1929, influencing modern community design,” supporting option C.

A green portfolio in a revolving loan fund supports businesses with environmentally sustainable practices. Option I (bicycle manufacturer) promotes sustainable transportation, reducing emissions. Option II (compost bin distributor) supports waste reduction and sustainability. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” states, “Green portfolio funds typically support businesses like bicycle manufacturers and compost distributors, which align with environmental sustainability goals.” Option III (affordable housing builder) focuses on social equity, not necessarily green practices unless specified. Option IV (computer manufacturer) is not inherently green without specific sustainability practices. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Green portfolio loans are available to businesses like bicycle manufacturers and compost distributors for their environmental benefits,” supporting option A (I and II).

Ian McHarg’s overlay planning technique, introduced in his 1969 bookDesign with Nature, uses map overlays to identify areas suitable for development by assessing environmental constraints (e.g., floodplains, slopes). The goal is to guide development to areas where it will be least environmentally damaging (option A). The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “McHarg’s overlay planning technique identifies areas for development that minimize environmental damage by analyzing natural constraints.” Option B (least economically viable) contradicts the purpose of guidingfeasible development. Options C (most physically feasible) and D (most spatially efficient) are secondary considerations, as McHarg prioritized environmental impact. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “McHarg’s method uses overlays to locate development where it is least environmentally damaging,” supporting option A.

Regional governance systems that bridge city-suburb boundaries manage shared resources like transit and housing. Minneapolis/St. Paul (I) has the Metropolitan Council, established in 1967, which oversees transit, wastewater, and housing across the Twin Cities region. Portland (III) has Metro, a directly elected regional government since 1979, managing urban growth boundaries, transit, and parks. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” identifies “Minneapolis/St. Paul’s Metropolitan Council and Portland’s Metro as leading examples of regional governance systems managing city-suburb issues.” Orlando (II) and Phoenix (IV) lack similar comprehensive regional bodies—Orlando has some transit coordination, and Phoenix has the Maricopa Association of Governments, but neither has the broad authority of Metro or the Metropolitan Council. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Minneapolis/St. Paul and Portland have formal regional governance systems bridging city-suburb boundaries,” supporting option B (I and III).

Fiscal impact analysis projects the financial effects of a development on a municipality, focusing on the net cash flow—revenues (e.g., taxes) minus costs (e.g., services, infrastructure). Option A (net cash flow to the public sector) is correct. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan Implementation,” defines fiscal impact analysis as “a projection of the net cash flow to the public sector from a development, balancing costs and revenues.” Option B (job creation, profitability) is part of economic impact analysis. Option C (regional, state, national taxes) is beyond the municipal scope of fiscal analysis. Option D (developer investment) focuses on private costs, not public impact. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Fiscal impact analysis projects the net cash flow to the public sector from development,” supporting option A.

Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), established in 1974, provide flexible funding for housing, infrastructure, and economic development with minimal unintended negative impacts, as they are locally controlled and often target revitalization without displacement. Option B (CDBG) fits this description. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” notes, “CDBG programs have fewer unintended negative impacts on neighborhoods, as they support local priorities without large-scale disruption.” Option A (flood insurance) can encourage development in flood-prone areas, leading to risk. Option C (interstate highways) often divided neighborhoods and caused displacement. Option D (urban renewal) led to widespread demolition and displacement in the mid-20th century. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “CDBG programs are noted for minimal negative impacts, unlike urban renewal or highways,” supporting option B.

Creative placemaking involves collaboration between public, private, and non-profit sectors to leverage a community’s arts and cultural assets for physical improvements, enhancing community identity and vitality. Option A (creative placemaking) matches this description. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” defines creative placemaking as “a process that partners with multiple sectors to use arts and culture for community development and physical improvements.” Option B (public realm activation) focuses on activating public spaces but not specifically through arts. Option C (design charrette) is a participatory design process, not necessarily arts-focused. Option D (scenario planning) is a strategic tool, not a development process. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “Creative placemaking uses arts and culture through multi-sector partnerships to create physical improvements,” supporting option A.

A nonconforming use refers to a property use that was lawful when established but does not comply with a subsequently adopted zoning ordinance. Option A correctly defines this as “not complying with the zoning ordinance but lawfully established before the ordinance was adopted.” The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” states, “Nonconforming uses are those that were legal prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance but do not conform to the new regulations.” Option B (allowed by the zoning appeals board) confuses nonconforming uses with variances. Option C (inconsistent with the neighborhood but permitted) is vague and not the legal definition. Option D (expanding after adoption) is incorrect, as nonconforming uses are typically restricted from expansion. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “A nonconforming use is one that was lawfully established before a zoning change and does not comply with the new ordinance,” supporting option A.