BCS BAPv5 - BCS Practitioner Certificate in Business Analysis Practice v5.2

The statement commits to two outcomes: good quality accommodation and repairs addressed in a timely manner. The documentation emphasises that performance targets and measures must be chosen carefully and should reflect not only internal views but also customer expectations; otherwise performance may look “fine” internally while failing customers. It also stresses that KPIs/targets should be SMART and monitored regularly.

Option A provides a clear, measurable proxy for property condition: if emergency repairs are needed in a high proportion of properties, that indicates poor underlying condition and reactive maintenance. Setting a target like “no more than 5%” directly measures progress toward “good quality accommodation.”

Option C translates tenant experience into a clear target: limiting complaints about condition/repairs to a defined maximum per month is specific and measurable, and it reflects the customer perspective that the press statement is trying to reassure.

Option B is a valid measure but it is not defined as a target (it has no threshold), so it is less aligned to the question asking for “targets to measure performance against.” Option D measures media coverage, which is indirect and can be influenced by factors outside operational performance; it is not a reliable operational KPI for accommodation quality or repair timeliness. Therefore, A and C are the best targets.

An enabling activity is an activity that supports or facilitates another activity within a business activity model. It helps to ensure that another activity can be performed or delivered effectively and efficiently. Therefore, option B is the correct answer, as it is an enabling activity linked to this planning activity. Define sales targets is an enabling activity linked to this planning activity, as it supports or facilitates defining marketing strategy. It helps to ensure that marketing strategy can be aligned with sales objectives and outcomes. Option A is not a correct answer, as it is not an enabling activity linked to this planning activity, but a monitoring and control activity. Monitor sales is a monitoring and control activity that measures or evaluates another activity within a business activity model. It helps to ensure that another activity meets quality and performance standards and criteria. Option C is not a correct answer, as it is not an enabling activity linked to this planning activity, but a doing activity. Advertise clothes is a doing activity that produces or delivers value or satisfaction for customers within a business activity model. It helps to achieve customer demand and satisfaction for products or services. Option D is not a correct answer, as it is not an enabling activity linked to this planning activity, but a doing activity. Sell clothes is a doing activity that produces or delivers value or satisfaction for customers within a business activity model. It helps to achieve customer demand and satisfaction for products or services.

To identify underlying causes, the analyst needs a technique that helps them explore what is happening in practice and uncover where breakdowns or inefficiencies might be occurring. The documentation describes scenario analysis as “telling the story of a task or transaction,” and explains it is useful when analysing or redesigning processes because it helps staff and analysts work through the steps required, visualise them clearly, and understand what triggers the work and what actions must be completed to achieve a successful outcome.

In a retail setting, declining sales can result from failures or friction in key customer-facing scenarios (e.g., browsing, ordering, returns, stock availability, customer service escalation). By building and walking through scenarios end-to-end, the analyst can pinpoint where delays, handoffs, rework, unclear decision points, or system constraints occur—each of which can contribute to poorer customer outcomes and, ultimately, sales decline. Scenario work also creates a concrete basis for validating hypotheses with stakeholders and for identifying what evidence and data should be gathered next.

The other options are less directly “cause-finding” for the stated problem. A customer journey map focuses on experience and touchpoints (useful, but it may not expose operational root causes in enough detail). Use case diagrams define system interactions for requirements, not root cause diagnosis. A business activity model gives a conceptual “what activities exist” overview; it is valuable for gaps, but scenario analysis is the technique explicitly positioned to walk through transactions to reveal where problems arise.

A logical dependency arrow on a BAM shows that one activity depends on another activity for its completion or initiation. In this question, the doing activity of ‘sell bespoke kitchens’ depends on the planning activity of ‘determine range of products’, as the customers need to select products from a predefined range when they design their kitchens. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

The glossary definition of a Business Activity Model states that it contains five activity types: Planning, Enabling, Doing, Monitoring, and Controlling. In the provided list, we can map each activity to these categories using the documented explanations and examples.

“Monitor call quality” is clearly a Monitoring activity, because monitoring activities measure performance and check whether expected results are being achieved. “Take control actions” is a Controlling activity. The guidance explains that when monitoring reveals performance is not as expected, control activities are required to institute remedial actions, and it provides an explicit example of a control activity (“Take control action”) on a BAM.

The remaining activities—“Define telesales skills,” “Determine sales targets,” and “Research target customers”—are Planning activities. The documentation describes planning activities as those that set direction for the business system, including defining numbers/skills needed and setting targets/KPIs. It also shows examples such as “Define target customers,” “Define nos/skills,” and “Define sales targets” as planning items on a BAM.

None of the listed items are Doing (the core operational delivery activity) or Enabling (acquiring/replenishing resources). Therefore, the three categories represented are Planning, Monitoring, and Controlling.

A customer journey map is a visual representation of the steps and emotions that a customer goes through when interacting with a product or service. It helps to identify the pain points and opportunities for improvement in the customer experience. A customer journey map typically consists of the following elements: stages, actions, thoughts, feelings, touchpoints and opportunities. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as it matches the elements of the customer journey map for Box F and Box 6. Box F represents the feeling of the customer at the stage of choosing a frame. The feeling is concern at cost, as the customer is worried about the price of the frames and lenses. Box 6 represents the opportunity for improvement at the stage of selecting lenses. The opportunity is to provide clearer information on options and pricing, as this would help the customer to make an informed decision and reduce their anxiety. Option B is not a correct answer, as it does not match the elements of the customer journey map for Box F and Box 6. Box F represents the feeling of the customer, not an opportunity for improvement. Box 6 represents an opportunity for improvement, not a feeling of the customer. Option C is not a correct answer, as it does not match the elements of the customer journey map for Box F and Box 6. Box F represents the feeling of the customer, not an opportunity for improvement. Box 6 represents an opportunity for improvement, not a feeling of the customer. Option D is not a correct answer, as it does not match the elements of the customer journey map for Box F and Box 6. Box F represents the feeling of the customer, not an opportunity for improvement. Box 6 represents an opportunity for improvement, not a feeling of the customer.

A brand is a name, term, design, symbol or any other feature that identifies one seller’s good or service as distinct from those of other sellers. A brand perception is how customers and potential customers view a brand based on their experiences, associations and impressions. Therefore, option A is the best choice, as independent industry websites are likely to provide unbiased and reliable information on how customers perceive different brands in the market. They may also include customer reviews, ratings and feedback that can help measure customer satisfaction and loyalty. Option B is not a good choice, as the company website is likely to provide biased and selective information on its own brand that may not reflect how customers actually perceive it. It may also omit negative aspects or criticisms that could affect its image or reputation. Option C is not a good choice, as the company’s organisational structure is not relevant to its brand perception. It may show how the company is organised internally, but it does not indicate how customers view its products or services externally. Option D is not a good choice, as the company’s complaints procedures are not sufficient to measure its brand perception. They may show how the company handles customer issues or problems, but they do not capture how customers feel about its overall quality or value.

In a SWOT analysis, the “strengths” and “weaknesses” are internal factors (within the organisation), while “opportunities” and “threats” are external factors (arising from outside the organisation). The documentation is explicit: strengths and weaknesses are found within the organisation, whereas opportunities and threats arise from outside and can often be identified using external analysis tools (for example PESTLE or Porter’s Five Forces).

Applying that rule to the options:

A (high-quality locally sourced ingredients) is an internal capability and therefore aligns with a strength.

D (lower staff morale) is an internal people/culture issue, therefore a weakness.

B (being asked to collaborate on distribution) is an external development that could create growth or access advantages, so it is more consistent with an opportunity.

C (a large chain bakery entering the area) is a change in the external competitive environment that could reduce the bakery’s market share, pricing power, and customer footfall. That fits the definition of a threat because it originates outside the bakery and could negatively affect performance.

Therefore, the correct external threat is C.

The technique that best supports identifying root causes of problematic attitudes is the rich picture. The documentation explains that many problematic business situations have “human and cultural aspects” that traditional structured models (like process or data models) cannot capture well. These aspects include differing viewpoints, misunderstandings, stress, dissatisfaction with management, frustration at inadequate resources, and other “people” factors that can directly affect outcomes. A rich picture explicitly enables the analyst to document these human factors alongside information flows and other issues, because it is intentionally unstructured and allows a “brain dump” of what is happening and how people feel about it.

The guidance also positions rich pictures as particularly useful in messy situations with multiple causes, helping the analyst see connections between issues and progressively enrich understanding as new information emerges. This matters in the scenario: complaints about the UI may reflect deeper causes such as poor navigation, unclear content, inconsistent interaction patterns, internal constraints, or misalignment between user expectations and design choices—plus stakeholder tensions about priorities. A rich picture is designed to surface and connect these causes and perceptions early in investigation.

A mind map can help structure information, but the rich picture is explicitly highlighted as the technique that captures the essence of the whole situation, especially where attitudes and cultural factors are significant.

The documentation defines Critical Success Factors (CSFs) as the few key areas where “things must go right” for the business to flourish and for managerial goals to be attained. The key points are that CSFs are few, they are key, and they are musts—not just “nice-to-have” activities.

Given the objectives, CSFs should be chosen that directly drive market share growth, customer loyalty, and expansion into new markets. Option A aligns strongly to “increase market share in key demographics” because pricing competitiveness is often a critical lever in apparel retail: if pricing drifts out of line with competitor positioning or customer value expectations, share and loyalty can rapidly erode. A CSF framed around continuously monitoring competitor pricing and responding in a controlled way supports both market share and profitability—key for sustained growth.

Option D aligns strongly to “expand product lines and reach new markets.” Establishing new distribution channels (marketplaces, stores, partnerships) is frequently a make-or-break capability for expansion: without the right channels, new product lines won’t reach target segments effectively. That makes it a credible “must go right” area.

Option E (follower count) is not necessarily critical—engagement can matter, but “follower count must remain high” is too narrow and can be a vanity metric. Options B and C may be important hygiene or internal factors, but they are not as directly tied to the stated objectives as A and D.