ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence - Certified Fraud Examiner - Fraud Prevention and Deterrence Exam

ï‚· Corruption and Fraud Risks:

Corruption involves abuse of power for personal or organizational gain and includes bribery, kickbacks, and aiding vendor fraud.

ï‚· Why B is Correct:

Espionage by competitors is not typically classified as corruption, as it does not directly involve abuse of internal authority or a relationship of trust. It is instead an external threat.

ï‚· Other Options:

A, C, and D are classical examples of corruption-related fraud risks​​.

Reporting Fraud Risk Assessment Results:

Reports should align with the organization ' s operational language to ensure comprehension by management and stakeholders.

Why A is Correct:

Using business-appropriate language ensures effective communication of findings and recommendations.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B:Comprehensive details may overwhelm the audience; only key findings are usually reported.

C:Reports should reflect objective analysis, not subjective perspectives​​.

Integration of Fraud Risk Assessment in Audits:

The fraud risk assessment provides valuable input but does not replace the auditor’s independent responsibility to identify and assess fraud risks.

Why B is Correct:

Professional auditing standards require auditors to perform their own risk assessments, and the fraud risk assessment is only a tool to enhance this process.

Why Other Options are Correct:

A, C, and D reflect appropriate uses of fraud risk assessments in the audit process, such as increasing awareness and designing effective audit tests​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics and Fraud Examination Guide​​.

COSO frameworks for corporate governance and fraud risk management​​.

Standards for incorporating fraud risk assessments into the audit process​​.

Corporate Governance Requirements for Public Corporations:

Publicly traded companies must adhere to the listing standards of the stock exchanges where their shares are traded (e.g., NYSE or NASDAQ).

B. G20/OECD Principles:These are guidelines, not binding requirements.

C. No requirements:Incorrect; corporate governance regulations apply regardless of jurisdiction.

D. Universal Corporate Governance Act:No such act exists globally.

Conclusion:Public corporations must comply with stock exchange-specific listing standards.

Analysis of Each Scenario:

A. Rodrigo:Reporting unrelated findings without a clear mandate violates principles of focus and relevance under the ACFE Code.

B. Vivian:Overlooking evidence demonstrates a lack of due diligence and professionalism.

C. Tom:Complying with a court order is permissible, but failure to safeguard client confidentiality before receiving the order constitutes a breach.

Ethical Standards:

Each scenario demonstrates a failure to meet the ethical and professional responsibilities outlined in the ACFE Code.

Conclusion:All scenarios represent violations of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics.

ï‚· ISSAI Standards:

The International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI) require government auditors to consider fraud and abuse during financial audits. Abuse includes improper use of authority or resources, which may not always meet the legal threshold of fraud but still warrants attention.

ï‚· Expanded Audit Scope:

Unlike private-sector audits, public-sector audits often have broader objectives, requiring vigilance for misuse of public funds and resources.

ï‚· Why A is Correct:

Staying alert to abuse ensures comprehensive accountability, aligning with ISSAI ' s objectives​​.

Proactive Fraud Auditing Procedures:

Analytical reviews are effective for identifying large or unusual trends and anomalies, not necessarily small frauds.

Other tools, such as detailed transaction testing, are better suited for uncovering small frauds.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Element of surprise:A key feature of fraud audits.

C. Fraud assessment questioning:Valid as part of the audit process.

D. Management’s intentions:Proactive procedures signal a strong stance against fraud.

Conclusion:Option B is false because analytical reviews are better at detecting significant anomalies rather than small frauds.

The Fraud Risk Management chapter summarizes the components of COSO ERM 2017 and explains that review and revision concerns how well ERM capabilities and practices have increased value over time and how they will continue to drive value for the organization. The manual quotes this concept directly when discussing review and revision. This component is concerned with assessing substantial changes, reviewing risk and performance, and improving ERM practices as circumstances evolve. It is therefore the part of the framework most closely associated with continual reassessment and enhancement over time. Governance and culture, by contrast, address tone, oversight, and ethical values, while strategy and objective-setting concern alignment with mission and performance goals. Thus, option B is the correct answer according to the manual’s presentation of COSO ERM.