ACFE CFE-Fraud-Schemes-and-Financial-Crimes - Certified Fraud Examiner -Fraud Schemes and Financial Crimes

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: The key goals of information security (the CIA triad plus authentication and non-repudiation ) are confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, and non-repudiation . While accuracy of data is important, it is not formally one of the core security goals.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Availability – Ensures users can access data when needed.

C. Authentication – Confirms identities before granting access.

D. Non-repudiation – Prevents denial of legitimate transactions.

Key Concept: Information security objectives for fraud prevention.

The ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual includes a specific subsection titled “Departures from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” within Accounting Concepts .

Under the Manual’s discussion of GAAP, the focus is on proper financial reporting so that transactions are recorded in their appropriate classifications and reported fairly in the financial statements. The Manual explains that GAAP are the standardized financial reporting practices used to ensure accurate and reliable reporting.

Based on this framework, a departure from GAAP can be justified only in limited circumstances, such as when strict compliance would make the financial statements misleading or when a different treatment is necessary to better reflect the substance of the transaction rather than only its form. Likewise, avoiding the overstatement of assets or income is consistent with fair presentation and conservative reporting principles. These are accounting-based justifications tied to faithful financial reporting.

By contrast, cost is not a valid reason to depart from GAAP. The fact that reporting a transaction in a GAAP-compliant manner would be more expensive does not justify noncompliance. Financial statements must be prepared in accordance with the applicable standards, not according to whichever treatment is cheaper or easier for management. Therefore, this option is the one that is NOT justifiable.

Why the other options are not the correct choice

A. To avoid overstating assets and/or income

This is consistent with fair presentation. The Manual’s discussion of GAAP is aimed at proper classification and reporting of transactions so that financial statements are not distorted.

C. To better reflect the substance of a transaction

This is a recognized accounting rationale. Financial reporting should reflect the economic reality of a transaction, not merely its legal form. This is consistent with the Manual’s discussion of proper reporting under GAAP.

D. Following GAAP would produce misleading results on financial statements

This is one of the classic reasons a departure can be justified, because the objective of financial reporting is fair presentation rather than mechanical compliance that misleads users.

References

ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual, 2020 International Edition

Accounting Concepts — Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

Accounting Concepts — Departures from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (1.122)

Rationale for Correct Answer: Traditional bribery laws historically applied only to government officials . When bribery occurs in the private sector (commercial setting), it is known as commercial bribery . Modern laws and internal company codes address this as well.

Key Concept: Commercial bribery vs. government bribery.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: The “outside the accounting system” approach occurs when perpetrators simply fabricate financial statements without regard to actual accounting records. Fraudsters may create entirely false reports using external tools (typewriters, spreadsheets, word processors).

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Organized accounting – Not a fraud classification.

B. Playing the accounting – Uses the real accounting system but manipulates entries.

C. Beating accounting – Refers to overriding controls but within the system.

D. Outside accounting system – Correct, as it involves entirely fabricated statements.

Key Concept: Outside-the-books fraud — fabricated financial reports not tied to accounting records.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: When cash is stolen, the accounting equation (Assets = Liabilities + Equity) must still balance. Fraudsters may increase a liability (e.g., record fictitious payables) to cover the missing cash. This is a common concealment method.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Increasing another asset – Would require inflating assets, but this usually affects financial statement fraud, not cash theft concealment.

B. Increasing owners’ equity – Not logical without legitimate earnings or capital contributions.

D. Creating fictitious revenue – Used in financial statement fraud, not in balancing theft concealment.

Key Concept: Concealment methods for asset misappropriation — offsetting missing cash with fictitious liabilities .

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: This is a tech-support scam , in which fraudsters trick victims into believing their computers are infected and then charge fees for unnecessary or fake repairs. The scam often targets elderly victims.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Pharming – Redirects users to fake websites, not fake support calls.

B. Bait and switch – Advertising deception, not fraudulent computer support.

D. Smishing – Fraud via SMS text messages, not on-screen computer popups.

Key Concept: Consumer fraud schemes — tech-support scams.

The correct answer is C. A nonconforming goods or services scheme occurs when a contractor delivers goods or services that do not meet contract specifications while representing them as compliant. Using refurbished materials when the contract requires new materials is a classic example because the contractor provides inferior or substituted materials but seeks payment as if the required materials were supplied. Option A describes change order abuse, where a low bid is later increased through contract modifications. Option B describes cost mischarging because the contractor bills for costs not incurred or improperly allocated. Option D describes a need recognition or collusive procurement scheme involving unnecessary goods or services. The key professional distinction is whether the deliverable itself fails to conform to contract requirements.

================

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: An advance-fee scheme occurs when fraudsters request upfront payments (fees, commissions, or deposits) for services or opportunities that never materialize. The broker taking the fee without providing services is a classic case.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Bait and switch – Advertising one product/service but delivering another, not applicable here.

C. Split deposit scheme – Involves diversion of payroll or deposits, not loans.

D. Scavenger scheme – Charging for unnecessary services, often debt collection or foreclosure help, not applicable.

Key Concept: Advance-fee frauds as common financial scams.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: The going concern assumption means that a business will continue operating indefinitely and will not liquidate in the near future. This underpins the use of historical cost accounting and normal accrual-based reporting.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Materiality – Relates to significance of information, not continuity.

C. Cost – Refers to historical cost valuation.

D. Fair value – Refers to current market value, not continuity.

Key Concept: Going Concern Assumption in accounting.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: Finding personal checks in the cash register is unusual, but it does not specifically indicate a register disbursement scheme (such as false refunds or voids). The other options are classic red flags for such schemes.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A – Missing transaction numbers suggest manipulation.

C – Excessive voids near approval limits indicate fraud concealment.

D – Allowing cashiers to void their own sales creates opportunity for abuse.

Key Concept: Register disbursement schemes and their red flags.