Isaca CGEIT - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

The MOST important consideration when planning for long-term IT service delivery is the ability of the IT organization to sustain business requirements. A service-oriented IT organization model is one that focuses on delivering value and outcomes to the business through IT services that are aligned with business needs and expectations1. To achieve this, the IT organization must be able to adapt to the changing and growing demands of the business, as well as the advances in technology and innovation. The IT organization must also have the necessary resources, capabilities, processes, and governance mechanisms to ensure the quality, reliability, availability, security, and performance of the IT services2. Therefore, the ability of the IT organization to sustain business requirements is essential for long-term IT service delivery.

The other options are not as important as option D. While it is important to have the approval of the business, an IT risk management process, and a comprehensive service catalog, these are not sufficient to ensure long-term IT service delivery. They are rather means to achieve the end goal of satisfying and sustaining business requirements. References :=

Make the IT function service-oriented - @CIOPortfolio1

What is SOA (Service-Oriented Architecture)? | IBM

Organizational culture is the most important consideration when designing an implementation plan for IT governance, because it influences the ethics, values, behaviors, and attitudes of the people involved in the governance process. Organizational culture also affects the acceptance, adoption, and sustainability of the IT governance framework and practices. According to COBIT 5, one of the seven enablers of IT governance is culture, ethics and behavior1. The roadmap for implementing and improving IT governance also emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing the cultural and behavioral aspects of the enterprise2. References := 1: COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT, ISACA, page 312: A Roadmap for Implementing and Improving IT Governance1

According to the web search results, a request for proposal (RFP) is a formal document that solicits proposals from potential vendors for a product or service. The RFP process is intended toensure a fair, transparent and objective selection of the best vendor that meets the requirements and expectations of the project sponsor and the enterprise. The RFP process typically involves the following steps1:

Planning and preparation: Define the scope, objectives, budget, timeline and evaluation criteria of the project. Identify the stakeholders and decision makers involved in the RFP process. Research the market and potential vendors. Develop the RFP document that outlines the project details, requirements, expectations and instructions for the vendors.

Issuing and advertising: Distribute the RFP document to the potential vendors, either directly or through public channels. Provide a deadline for submitting proposals and a contact person for inquiries. Advertise the RFP opportunity to attract more qualified vendors.

Receiving and reviewing: Receive the proposals from the vendors by the deadline. Review and evaluate the proposals based on the predefined criteria, such as technical capabilities, experience, references, pricing, etc. Shortlist the most suitable vendors for further consideration.

Negotiating and awarding: Conduct negotiations with the shortlisted vendors to clarify any questions, concerns or issues. Discuss the terms and conditions of the contract, such as scope, deliverables, schedule, payment, etc. Select the best vendor that offers the most value and benefit to the project and the enterprise. Award the contract to the chosen vendor and notify the other vendors of the decision.

Managing and monitoring: Manage and monitor the performance and progress of the vendor throughout the project lifecycle. Ensure that the vendor meets the contractual obligations and delivers quality results on time and within budget. Provide feedback and support to the vendor as needed. Resolve any conflicts or disputes that may arise.

A project sponsor who circumvents the RFP selection process violates the established policies and procedures of the enterprise, as well as undermines the integrity and credibility of the RFP process. The most likely reason for this control gap is a lack of accountability for policy adherence, which means that there is no clear assignment of roles and responsibilities for following and enforcing the policies, or no effective mechanisms for monitoring and reporting policy compliance, or no adequate consequences for policy violations. A lack of accountability for policy adherence can lead to poor governance, increased risk, reduced value and damaged reputation for both the project sponsor and the enterprise23. Therefore, it is essential to establish and maintain a strong culture of accountability for policy adherence within the enterprise, as well as to implement appropriate controls and measures to ensure compliance with policies. References: The RFP process: The Ultimate Step-by-Step Guide, Criteria and Methodology for GRC Platform Selection, The Ultimate RFP Guide: Steps, Guidelines & Template, Guidebook: Crafting a Driven Request for Proposals (RFP)

The risk profile of the enterprise is the most important thing to consider first when conducting a risk assessment in support of a new regulatory requirement, as it reflects the overall exposure and tolerance of the enterprise to various types of risks, such as strategic, operational, financial, or compliance risks. The risk profile of the enterprise can help determine the scope, objectives, and criteria of the risk assessment, as well as the prioritization and allocation of resources and efforts for risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment. The risk profile of the enterprise can also help align the risk assessment with the enterprise’s strategy, goals, and values, as well as ensure consistency and integration with other risk management activities or processes.

Disruption to normal business operations, readiness of IT systems to address the risk, and cost burden to achieve compliance are also important things to consider when conducting a risk assessment in support of a new regulatory requirement, but they are not the first thing to consider. Disruption to normal business operations is a potential consequence or impact of the risk on the enterprise’s performance, productivity, or continuity. Disruption to normal business operations can be assessed and measured during the risk analysis or evaluation stage of the risk assessment, as well as mitigated or reduced during the risk treatment or response stage. Readiness of IT systems to address the risk is a factor that affects the capability or maturity of the enterprise’s IT infrastructure, applications, or services to comply with or support the new regulatory requirement. Readiness of IT systems to address the risk can be assessed and improved during the risk treatment or response stage of the risk assessment, as well as monitored and reported during the risk communication or review stage. Cost burden to achieve compliance is a factor that affects the feasibility or affordability of the enterprise’s actions or investments to comply with or support the new regulatory requirement. Cost burden to achieve compliance can be estimated and optimized during the risk treatment or response stage of the risk assessment, as well as balanced with the benefits or value of compliance.

Negotiating service level agreements (SLAs) is the best way for an organization to minimize the difference between expected and delivered services when acquiring resources, because SLAs define the scope, quality, availability, performance, and security of the services that the provider will deliver to the customer. SLAs also specify the roles and responsibilities, escalation procedures, and penalties for non-compliance of both parties. By negotiating SLAs, the organization can ensure that its expectations and requirements are clearly communicated and agreed upon by the provider, and that there are mechanisms to measure and monitor the service delivery and outcomes. Negotiating SLAs also helps to prevent or resolve any disputes or issues that may arise from the service provision, and to ensure that the organization receives the value and benefits that it expects from the provider. One of the sources that supports this answer is Service-level Agreement: 3 Types And Templates - Contract Lawyers, which states that “A service-level agreement is important because it: Protects both parties: The SLA sets standards for the service, ensuring both the service provider and end user are on the same page with expectations.”

 The first course of action when assessing the impact of a new regulatory requirement is to map the regulation to business processes. This means identifying and analyzing which business processes are affected by the new regulation, how they are affected, and what changes are needed to comply with the regulation1. Mapping the regulation to business processes helps to understand the scope, complexity, and priority of the regulatory compliance project, and to align the IT and business objectives and strategies1. It also helps to identify the stakeholders, roles, responsibilities, and risks involved in the compliance process, and to communicate and coordinate with them effectively1. The other options are not as important as mapping the regulation to business processes, as they are dependent on the outcome of this step. Updatingaffected IT policies, assessing the budget impact of the new regulation, and implementing new regulatory requirements are subsequent steps that should be done after mapping the regulation to business processes2. References: How to Map Regulations to Business Processes. CGEIT Certification | Certified in Governance of Enterprise IT | ISACA.

Data classification is a process of organizing and categorizing data based on its characteristics, confidentiality, and sensitivity. Data classification helps to determine the level of access and protection that data requires. Data classification also makes data easier to understand, compare, and analyze. Data classification is an essential part of information security, as it helps to align the security measures and policies with the data’s value and risk. By incorporating data classification into the information architecture, the IT processes can ensure that information security requirements are taken into consideration from the design stage to the implementation stage. References :=

What is Data Classification? A Data Classification Definition

What is Sensitive Data? Definition, Examples, and More

When preparing a new IT strategic plan for board approval, the MOST important consideration is to ensure the plan identifies roles and responsibilities that link to IT objectives. A well-defined IT strategic plan should clearly articulate the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the IT function, as well as the strategies and actions to achieve them1. However, without assigning roles and responsibilities to the relevant stakeholders, the plan may lack accountability, ownership, and alignment2. Therefore, it is crucial to identify who is responsible for what, how they will collaborate and communicate, and how they will be measured and rewarded3. This can help to ensure the successful execution and monitoring of the IT strategic plan, as well as the alignment with the business strategy and expectations4.

The other options are not as important as option A. While it is useful to have specific resourcing requirements, frameworks, and implications of the strategy on the procurement process, these are more operational and tactical aspects that can be determined later in the implementation phase.They are not essential for the board approval of the IT strategic plan, which should focus more on the strategic direction and value proposition of the IT function. References :=

How to Write an Information Technology (IT) Business Proposal | Examples1

The Role of Board Approval in the Strategic Planning Process - Veralon2

How To Get The Board To Say Yes - Gartner3

The Board’s Role in Strategy | WATSON4

Overseeing strategy: A framework for boards of directors - CPA Canada

Practical and enforceable policies are the best way to contribute to the successful implementation of a framework to implement IT governance, as they provide clear and consistent guidance and direction for IT activities, processes, and decisions. Practical and enforceable policies are based on the enterprise’s strategy, goals, and values, as well as the relevant regulations and standards. Practical and enforceable policies also define the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the IT stakeholders, as well as the mechanisms for monitoring, measuring, and reporting on IT performance and compliance. Practical and enforceable policies can help ensure that IT governance is effective, efficient, and aligned with the business needs and expectations.

Automated compliance tracking, comprehensive and timely audit reviews, and periodic peer reviews are also useful ways to support the implementation of a framework to implement IT governance, but they are not the best way. Automated compliance tracking is a process that uses software tools or systems to collect, analyze, and report on IT compliance data, such as policies, standards, controls, risks, incidents, or issues. Automated compliance tracking can help reduce the time and effort required for IT compliance management, as well as improve the accuracy and reliability of IT compliance information. Comprehensive and timely audit reviews are assessments that evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of IT governance, management, and operations. Comprehensive and timely audit reviews can help identify and address any weaknesses or gaps in IT governance, as well as provide recommendations for improvement. Periodic peer reviews are evaluations that compare the IT governance practices of an enterprise with those of its peers or competitors. Periodic peer reviews can help benchmark and improve the IT governance performance of an enterprise, as well as identify best practices or opportunities for innovation.

References := IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager; What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy; What is IT Governance (ITG) and why does it matter? - IFS Blog; IT Governance Framework - CIO Wiki; What is IT Governance? How to Implement | Electric.

 Aligning EA and procurement strategies is the best way to ensure the success of the supplier policy that requires multiple technology suppliers. EA provides a holistic view of the current and future state of the enterprise’s IT architecture, including its business processes, applications, data, infrastructure, and security. Procurement strategies define how the enterprise will acquire the necessary IT resources, services, and solutions from external suppliers. By aligning EA and procurement strategies, the enterprise can ensure that the supplier selection and management are consistent with the enterprise’s vision, goals, and requirements, and that the suppliers can deliver value, quality, and innovation to the enterprise. References: CGEIT Domain 2: IT Resources

The best way for an IT steering committee to monitor the adoption of a new enterprise IT strategy is to establish key performance indicators (KPIs), because they are metrics that measure the progress and achievement of the IT strategic objectives and goals, and provide feedback and guidance for improvement. KPIs can help the IT steering committee to track and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the IT function, and to ensure that the IT activities and resources are aligned with the business needs and expectations12. KPIs can also help to communicate and report the IT value delivery and innovation to the board and other stakeholders12. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 43-44.

The most significant challenge faced by an enterprise when establishing information stewardship is the lack of role clarity and specific responsibilities, as this can lead to confusion, duplication, inconsistency, or omission of tasks and activities related to information governance. Information stewardship is the role of providing day-to-day operational support using data, such as defining and implementing data policies, standards, and procedures; monitoring and reporting on data compliance and performance; and collaborating with other stakeholders to ensure data quality, integrity, and security1. Information stewardship requires clear and consistent definition of the scope, objectives, and expectations of the role, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the information stewards and their relationship with other data owners, users, or scientists1. Withoutrole clarity and specific responsibilities, information stewardship may not be effective or efficient in achieving the desired outcomes or benefits of information governance.

Lack of documented policies and procedures, information requirements of regulatory authorities, and insufficient knowledge of IT practices and controls are also challenges faced by an enterprise when establishing information stewardship, but they are not the most significant challenge. Lack of documented policies and procedures is a challenge that can affect the standardization and improvement of information governance processes and activities, as well as the communication and enforcement of data rules and expectations. Information requirements of regulatory authorities are a challenge that can affect the compliance and accountability of information governance, as well as the protection and privacy of data. Insufficient knowledge of IT practices and controls is a challenge that can affect the technical skills and capabilities of information stewards, as well as their ability to use or integrate data systems or tools.

References := What is an Information Steward? | Informatica; What is an Information Steward, and Why You Should Care; What is an Information Steward, and Why You Should Care?.

Translating business needs into IT initiatives. IT strategic planning is the process of defining how the IT function supports and enables the overall business strategy and objectives of an enterprise1. It helps to align IT with business goals, optimize IT investments and resources, manage IT risks and opportunities, and deliver value to the stakeholders1. By implementing an IT strategic planning process, an enterprise can translate its business needs into IT initiatives that are consistent, coherent, and feasible1. These IT initiatives can include projects, programs, services, systems, architectures, policies, standards, and processes that address the current and future business requirements and challenges1. Translating business needs into IT initiatives is the primary goal of implementing an IT strategic planning process, as it ensures that IT is responsive, relevant, and effective in supporting the enterprise’s mission, vision, and values1.

An enterprise code of ethics is a set of principles and values that guide the behavior and decision-making of the organization and its members. It can help to incorporate desired organizational behaviors into the IT governance framework by establishing a common understanding and expectation of what is acceptable and unacceptable, and by promoting a culture of integrity, accountability, and responsibility. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 17.

This is a barrier to strategic alignment of business and IT, as it creates inconsistency and fragmentation in the IT governance process across the enterprise. Strategic alignment of business and IT is the degree of fit and integration among business strategy, IT strategy, business infrastructure, and IT infrastructure1. It helps to ensure that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to the stakeholders1. To achieve strategic alignment, an enterprise needs to have a coherent and coordinated IT governance process that aligns IT with business goals, optimizes IT investments and resources, manages IT risks and opportunities, and measures IT performance and benefits1. However, if each business unit has its own steering committee for IT investment and prioritization, this may result in conflicting or competing IT priorities, duplication or waste of IT resources, lack of communication or collaboration among IT stakeholders, or misalignment of IT services and capabilities with business needs and expectations1. Therefore, each business unit having its own steering committee for IT investment and prioritization is a barrier to strategic alignment of business and IT.

The other options are not barriers to strategic alignment of business and IT, as they are possible enablers or indicators of strategic alignment. Uniform portfolio management is the process of selecting, prioritizing, balancing, and monitoring the IT investments and initiatives that support the enterprise’s strategic objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders2. Uniform portfolio management can help to align IT with business goals, optimize resource allocation, manage risks and dependencies, and measure performance and benefits2. IT being the exclusive provider of IT services to the business units can help to ensure that the IT services are consistent, reliable, secure, and compliant with the enterprise’s standards and policies3. The enterprise’s CIO being a member of the executive committee can help to demonstrate the strategic importance and contribution of IT to the enterprise’s success, as well as facilitate the communication and collaboration between IT and business leaders4.