ISM CORE - Supply Management Core Exam

To improve supplier innovations, the firm aims to conduct supply market research, identify emerging technologies, and analyze supplier capabilities.

Forming a center of excellence can centralize expertise, drive innovation, and coordinate efforts to stay updated on market trends and emerging technologies.

Reorganizing the research and development department might help but does not specifically focus on supplier innovations.

Conducting business review meetings can provide insights but may not be sufficient for a comprehensive innovation strategy.

Redesigning the firm’s supplier scorecards can improve performance tracking but is not directly related to driving innovation.

A center of excellence is the most effective way to centralize efforts, leverage expertise, and systematically drive supplier innovations.

References:

APQC (American Productivity & Quality Center) guidelines on establishing centers of excellence.

Research on the role of centers of excellence in driving innovation and supply chain management.

Supplier Offer: The supplier offers the 200-gigabyte software package at $700, including a malware license valued at $147.

FGH's Needs: FGH needs both the software package and the malware license.

Cost Avoidance: By accepting the supplier's offer, FGH avoids the additional cost of purchasing the malware license separately. Cost avoidance refers to actions taken to prevent incurring costs in the future.

References

ISM. (n.d.). Understanding Cost Savings and Cost Avoidance.

CIPS. (n.d.). Cost Management in Procurement.

When a supplier requests that the contract be based on its local currency, the first course of action for the supply manager is to assess the potential financial implications of this request. Exchange rate fluctuations can significantly impact the cost of goods and services over time. By performing exchange rate due diligence with the help of a financial advisor, the supply manager can understand the risks and potential cost variations. This involves analyzing historical exchange rate trends, forecasting future movements, and considering hedging strategies to mitigate risk. The supply manager can then make an informed decision on how to proceed with the supplier's request. References:

Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Cengage Learning.

Supply Chain Management Review articles on currency risk management

To maintain production and prevent delays due to raw material outages and quality issues, the manufacturing firm should ensure a reliable supply chain strategy.

Add 25% to raw material purchases to ensure there is enough inventory in case of supplier delays or quality problems: This increases inventory costs and may not address quality issues effectively.

Contract with multiple suppliers rather than depend upon one supplier to provide raw materials: Diversifying suppliers is beneficial but may complicate logistics and quality control.

Develop a strategic relationship with its main supplier: This can enhance collaboration and reliability but does not address immediate operational needs.

Maintain safety stock and implement an automatic reordering process when inventory drops below a certain level: This is the best course of action as it ensures that there is always enough inventory to prevent production delays and manages reorder points efficiently to maintain continuous supply.

Therefore, the best course of action is to maintain safety stock and implement an automatic reordering process when inventory drops below a certain level.

References:

Inventory management principles.

Supply chain risk management strategies.

Issue During Negotiations: Team members are making mistakes and not following instructions shortly after negotiations commence.

Immediate Action: Calling a caucus allows the supply manager to pause the negotiations and address the issues immediately.

Reiterate Rules: Reiterating the negotiation rules and their importance helps in realigning the team and ensuring everyone understands their roles and responsibilities.

Preventing Further Issues: This approach aims to correct the team’s behavior and improve the chances of successful negotiations without removing stakeholders or ending the negotiations prematurely.

References

ISM. (n.d.). Best Practices for Leading Negotiation Teams.

CIPS. (n.d.). Effective Negotiation Strategies and Techniques.

A joint research and development (R&D) team is most beneficial for developing supplier technologies and processes important to the buying organization. By forming a joint R&D team, both the buying organization and the supplier can collaborate closely to innovate and improve technologies and processes that are directly aligned with the organization's strategic goals. This collaboration fosters knowledge sharing, leverages combined expertise, and enhances mutual commitment to achieving advanced technological solutions and process improvements that benefit both parties. References:

Monczka, R., Handfield, R., Giunipero, L., & Patterson, J. (2020). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Cengage Learning.

ISM (Institute for Supply Management) resources on supplier collaboration and joint development.

In this situation, the best tactic is to continue negotiations while keeping an eye on the lawsuit's progress. This approach allows the buying firm to proceed with securing the critical part needed for operations without significant delays. Postponing negotiations (A) could lead to operational disruptions, while requesting more favorable payment terms (B) might not address the underlying risk associated with the lawsuit. Purchasing an all-risk insurance policy (D) could be a complementary action but does not directly resolve the immediate need to negotiate terms with the supplier. References: Concepts of risk management and supplier relationship management in supply chain and procurement textbooks.

The supply manager should pay $13,000 now and $5,000 14 days after the receipt of the replacement goods. This approach balances the need to adhere to preferential payment terms, which are important for the supplier's cash flow, while ensuring that payment is made for the correct goods received. It respects the negotiated terms and maintains good supplier relations by providing timely partial payment, with the balance due upon the fulfillment of the complete order.

References:

Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management.

Institute for Supply Management (ISM). (2020). ISM Glossary of Key Supply Management Terms.

Negotiation Tactics: Suppliers can use various tactics to gain an advantage in negotiations.

Power Position: DEF is the primary source for the material and is aware that XYZ has limited alternatives due to lead time constraints.

Delays and Postponements: By delaying negotiations, DEF might be trying to leverage its power position, knowing XYZ cannot easily switch suppliers.

Implications for XYZ: XYZ may feel pressured to concede to DEF’s terms due to the urgency of their need for the materials.

Strategic Response: XYZ needs to consider strategies to mitigate DEF's leverage, such as seeking alternative suppliers in the long term or negotiating better terms to manage future risks. References

Fisher, Ury, and Patton’s "Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In".

Context: Evaluating bids for a delivery van with consideration of cost and potential buyback offers.

Cost Calculation:

Supplier J: $50,000

Supplier K: $52,500 with a $3,000 buyback.

Opportunity Cost: The present value (PV) factor for 5 years at 10% is 0.62.

Supplier K’s Net Cost: $52,500 - ($3,000 * 0.62) = $52,500 - $1,860 = $50,640

Comparison: Supplier J’s cost is $50,000, Supplier K’s effective cost is $50,640.

Lifecycle Savings: Supplier K offers a buyback, which provides future value and offsets initial higher cost.

Conclusion: Over the van's life cycle, Supplier K's offer results in cost savings considering the buyback.

References

Capital Budgeting Techniques by Brigham and Ehrhardt.

Present Value calculations and decision-making in procurement.