IIA IIA-CHAL-QISA - Qualified Info Systems Auditor CIA Challenge Exam

Management-by-Objectives (MBO):This method involves setting clear, measurable objectives that employees and management agree on. It aligns individual performance with organizational goals.

Inclusive Goal-Setting:When goal-setting is inclusive, involving all team members, it fosters a sense of ownership and commitment to the goals. This collaboration enhances motivation and accountability.

Empirical Evidence:Research and practical experience indicate that MBO is more effective when employees at all levels are involved in the goal-setting process, as it leads to better performance and job satisfaction.

IIA Standards and Best Practices:Encouraging participation from all levels aligns with the principles of good governance and effective management, which are central to the IIA's standards and best practices.

References:

Principles of Management-by-Objectives (MBO) .

Identify the Conflict of Interest:The internal auditor learns about a large loan made to another auditor's relative, which represents a conflict of interest.

Refer to Professional Standards:According to the Institute of Internal Auditors' (IIA) standards, an internal auditor must maintain objectivity and avoid conflicts of interest (IIA Standard 1100 – Independence and Objectivity).

Escalate the Issue:The appropriate course of action is to escalate this matter to the chief audit executive (CAE) and management, as they are responsible for determining the impact of the conflict and the appropriate response.

Decision Making:The CAE and management will assess whether the conflict of interest could impair the auditor's objectivity and decide whether the auditor should be removed from the engagement or if additional oversight is needed.

Documentation:It is important to document the conflict and the decision-making process in the audit documentation for transparency and accountability.

References:

The IIA’s International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, specifically Standard 1100 on Independence and Objectivity.

Introduction:

When the internal audit team lacks necessary skills for an ad-hoc assurance engagement, leveraging internal resources can be a practical solution.

Resolving Skill Gaps:

Using employees from other departments can provide the needed expertise while maintaining the engagement's integrity.

Options Analysis:

Option A: Declining the engagement may not be feasible and does not address the need.

Option B: Completing the engagement without the required skills can compromise quality.

Option C: Using employees from other departments brings in the necessary competencies and supports cross-functional collaboration.

Option D: Changing the scope may limit the effectiveness of the engagement.

Conclusion:

The acceptable resolution is to consider using employees from other departments in the organization to bring in the required skills for the engagement.

If an organization pays one of its liabilities twice, its assets (cash) would be reduced more than necessary. This results in an understatement of net income and owners’ equity because the additionalpayment is an expense that should not have been recorded. Liabilities would be overstated because the duplicate payment does not reduce the liability correctly.

References:

"Financial Accounting Principles," which discusses the impact of errors on financial statements.

Key performance indicator (KPI) reports are essential tools for tracking and evaluating the performance of various processes and activities within an organization. By reviewing these reports in detail during monthly staff meetings, operational management in the IT department aims to identify any discrepancies or issues promptly. This continuous monitoring helps to prevent a "monitoring gap," which is the failure to adequately oversee and assess operations, potentially leading to undetected problems or inefficiencies

ï‚·Supervision in Internal Audit: Effective supervision ensures that the engagement is carried out according to plan, objectives are met, and quality standards are maintained. It involves guiding, mentoring, and reviewing the work of auditors throughout the engagement.

ï‚·IIA Standards:

Standard 2340 – Engagement Supervision: Internal audit engagements must be properly supervised to ensure objectives are achieved, quality is maintained, and staff are developed.

Proper supervision includes overseeing the engagement, providing direction, and ensuring that work complies with standards and achieves engagement objectives.

ï‚·Examples of Proper Supervision:

Reasonable Assurance: The auditor in charge providing reasonable assurance that engagement objectives were met is a fundamental aspect of effective supervision. It ensures that the engagement delivers the intended outcomes and adheres to quality standards.

Daily Records and Workpaper Review: Options A and B involve administrative tasks and peer review, which are supportive but do not alone constitute comprehensive supervision.

Accompanied Training: Option C involves on-the-job training, which is beneficial but not the primary aspect of engagement supervision.

Analytical review procedures involve evaluating financial information by studying plausible relationships among financial and non-financial data.

Government Index Comparison: Comparing the organization's increase in health-care costs with a relevant government index provides a benchmark to assess whether the cost increases are in line with broader economic trends.

Claims Review: While reviewing all claims could help identify specific overpayments, it is more labor-intensive and less effective for evaluating overall reasonableness.

Competitive Bids: Obtaining bids from other health-care administrators might control future costs but does not evaluate the reasonableness of past cost increases.

Industry Comparison: Comparing costs with those incurred by similar organizations could be useful but might not provide a standardized measure like a government index.

References:

"Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach," which details the use of analytical procedures in evaluating financial data.

ï‚·Understanding Staffing Models: Internal audit activity staffing models vary in structure and approach, each with its advantages and disadvantages. The rotational model involves assigning employees from various departments to the internal audit activity for a fixed period before they rotate back to their original or new roles within the organization.

ï‚·Rotational Model Disadvantages:

Continuous Training: A key disadvantage of the rotational model is that auditors are often new and in training. This model means that there is a constant influx of new staff who may lack extensive audit experience, requiring continuous training and development efforts.

Consistency and Expertise: This can impact the consistency and depth of audit expertise within the internal audit activity, as the auditors are frequently changing.

ï‚·Comparison with Other Models:

Career Model: Auditors build long-term careers within the internal audit activity, leading to high levels of expertise and consistency.

Center of Competence Model: This model involves a centralized team of audit professionals who provide specialized audit services across the organization, ensuring high levels of competence.

Hybrid Model: Combines elements of multiple models to balance the benefits and mitigate the drawbacks of each approach.

ï‚·References:

The rotational model's major drawback of auditors always being new and in training highlights the challenges in maintaining a stable and highly skilled audit team. Continuous training efforts are required to ensure the effectiveness of this staffing model​​​​.

The expectations and objectives of an assurance engagement are often determined in conjunction with the engagement client, aligning with the client's needs and the scope of the engagement. In consulting engagements, internal auditors provide advice and services tailored to the client's requests, which may not always follow a preliminary risk assessment process like in assurance engagements.

ï‚·The internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility.

Establishing the internal audit activity's position within the organization in an audit charter ensures independence and objectivity by clearly stating the internal audit’s role and its reporting lines.

ï‚·The charter should be approved by the board and senior management to reinforce its authority and protect the internal audit activity from undue influence by management