IIA IIA-CIA-Part1 - Internal Audit Fundamentals

According to IIA guidance, the internal audit activity's quality assurance and improvement program (QAIP) encompasses both internal and external assessments. Internal assessments involve ongoing monitoring and periodic self-assessments or reviews, while external assessments are conducted by a qualified, independent assessor at least once every five years.

The chief audit executive (CAE) has the responsibility to ensure that the external assessor possesses the appropriate qualifications and independence to perform the assessment. This includes evaluating the assessor's competence, experience, and objectivity. This responsibility is crucial for maintaining the integrity and reliability of the QAIP.

IIA Standard 1312: External Assessments

IIA Practice Guide: Quality Assurance and Improvement Program

The key difference between assurance services and consulting services is that other employees in the organization can provide consulting services, but only an internal audit activity can provide assurance services. This distinction is important because assurance services require a level of independence and adherence to specific standards that are unique to the internal audit profession. References: IIA definitions and standards for assurance and consulting services, which delineate the roles and limitations of these services within internal audit practices.

The inclusion of a clause in each engagement report stating that the engagement conforms with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing is justified if the internal audit activity's policies and engagement records provide relevant, sufficient, and competent evidence that this statement is correct. This indicates that the internal audit activity consistently applies the standards in its engagements and the quality assurance and improvement program effectively monitors and ensures this conformance.

IIA Standard 1300: "Quality Assurance and Improvement Program"

The most appropriate action for the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) to take in the scenario where staff might mistakenly believe the new internal auditor is related to the procurement manager is to discuss the matter with the appropriate personnel to alleviate concerns. This action ensures that concerns about independence and objectivity are addressed transparently, maintaining trust in the internal audit function.

The IIA’s Code of Ethics and standards on objectivity, which stress the importance of maintaining and demonstrating impartiality in all audit engagements.

If the recommendations made by the internal audit activity regarding the organization's risk management function remain unaddressed, the next step should be for the chief audit executive (CAE) to discuss this matter with senior management and the board. This discussion aims to ensure that senior leaders are aware of the unaddressed risks and can take necessary actions to address the internal audit's findings effectively.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, which stipulate the CAE's responsibilities in communicating significant risk exposures and control issues to senior management and the board.

Internal auditors are required to have sufficient knowledge to identify indicators of fraud. They should recognize red flags and investigate them further, even if their primary responsibility is not to detect fraud. References:

IIA Standard 1210.A2 - Proficiency: Internal auditors must have sufficient knowledge to evaluate the risk of fraud.

IIA Practice Guide on Fraud and Internal Auditors.

The primary role of the internal audit activity in relation to an organization’s internal controls is to provide an independent evaluation of risk management processes and internal control systems. This involves analyzing and advising on the costs versus benefits of control activities, ensuring that the controls are not only effective but also efficient in mitigating risks.

IIA Performance Standard 2130 - Control

When an organization purchases a derivative contract in the stock market to limit the potential loss in the value of a security, it is transferring the risk to another party. In this case, the derivative contract (such as options or futures) serves as a hedge against potential losses, meaning the risk of loss is transferred to the counterparty of the derivative contract. References:

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) standards and guidelines on risk management and control.

The IIA Standards state that conformance with standards related to independence and objectivity is not dependent upon the size of the internal audit activity. All internal audit functions, regardless of their size, must adhere to the principles of independence and objectivity to ensure that their work is unbiased and free from undue influence. This is fundamental to the credibility and reliability of the internal audit activity’s work and findings. While small internal audit activities may face unique challenges, such as resource limitations, these challenges do not exempt them from maintaining these core principles.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) - Standard 1100 on Independence and Objectivity.

By performing an audit engagement, the internal audit activity can systematically review and assess the current risk management practices in the electricity sales processes. This will provide senior management with a detailed understanding of the existing controls, processes, and any gaps or areas for improvement. An audit engagement offers a structured approach to identifying and evaluating risks and controls, which is essential for developing effective risk management strategies. References: The IIA’s International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards), specifically Standard 2200 - Engagement Planning, and Standard 2210 - Engagement Objectives.

This scenario violates The IIA's standards regarding internal audit independence because the chief risk officer's involvement in validating and dictating which audit findings are included in the audit committee reports undermines the independence of the internal audit activity. Independence is compromised when audit findings are subject to alteration or selection by another party within the organization, particularly one involved in managing risks that the audit may be assessing.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, specifically standards related to independence.

The use of benchmarking research to support the preparation of a report on control deficiencies demonstrates critical thinking. This skill involves analyzing and evaluating information from multiple sources to form a well-rounded view of the audit area, leading to significant findings and effective recommendations in the audit report.

Commonly recognized audit practices and skills as documented in auditing literature and the IIA's Competency Framework.

The first step in addressing a notification from a whistleblower about a conflict of interest should be to gain an understanding of the employee's role, responsibilities, and relationship with the supplier. This step is critical before conducting interviews or notifying others, as it helps establish the context for the investigation, ensuring that further steps are informed and targeted effectively.

IIA guidance on handling whistleblower claims and conducting internal investigations.

According to the IIA’s definition of due professional care, internal auditors are expected to perform assurance services that are needed to achieve the engagement's objectives. This includes considering the cost of assurance in relation to the benefits. The standard does not require auditors to identify all risks or guarantee that all significant risks will be addressed, as absolute assurance in any auditing context is unattainable.

IIA Standard on Due Professional Care.

To ensure compliance with an organization's code of conduct, the chief audit executive should act as an advisor to the committee responsible for reviewing violations of the code. This role allows the CAE to contribute expertise and oversight without directly managing the process, which helps maintain the necessary independence and objectivity of the internal audit function.

IIA guidance on the role of the internal audit in governance, particularly relating to compliance with codes of conduct.