IIA IIA-CIA-Part1 - Essentials of Internal Auditing

According to IIA guidance, when implementing the risk management process in a dynamic agency, it is most appropriate that the risk management process should be regularly reviewed and respond to changes in the environment to remain relevant. This principle ensures that the risk management practices are flexible and adaptive, reflecting the dynamic nature of risk within a changing organizational and external environment. This approach is consistent with both the IIA's guidance on risk management and the principles outlined in ISO 31000.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - Guidance on Risk Management, ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines.

Establishing effective governing body oversight enhances the independence of the internal audit activity by providing a high-level check on the audit function, ensuring that it operates without undue influence from management. This helps maintain the autonomy necessary for the internal audit to effectively challenge and assess management practices and controls.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing; governance frameworks.

Demonstrating due professional care during an assurance engagement, according to IIA standards, includes systematically planning, executing, and documenting audit procedures. This ensures that all aspects of the engagement are covered comprehensively and that findings and conclusions are well-supported and credible. This approach aligns with the IIA's definition of due professional care, which emphasizes thoroughness and accuracy in the audit process.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

To effectively determine whether ethical values are followed throughout an organization, internal auditors should review employee survey responses and follow up on those that suggest weaknesses in the ethical climate. This approach allows auditors to gather firsthand insights from employees about the actual ethical environment, which can be more telling than formal documentation or compliance with written policies alone. It provides a direct measure of the ethical culture as experienced and perceived by the employees themselves.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing; Guidance on assessing organizational culture.

According to IIA guidance, the internal audit activity should refrain from indicating conformance with the Standards until all areas of nonconformance identified in a quality assessment have been addressed and the chief audit executive has confirmed this to the audit committee. This ensures that the internal audit activity only claims conformance when it fully meets the Standards, maintaining the credibility of the audit function.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, and guidance on external quality assessments.

It would be considered problematic for the chief audit executive (CAE) to provide assurance services over the payroll function if, prior to becoming the CAE, the CAE was the payroll manager. This scenario poses a conflict of interest and impacts the objectivity required for assurance services, as the CAE might have inherent biases or a conflict due to previous roles and responsibilities within the payroll function.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - Code of Ethics and International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

According to the standards and practices of internal auditing, the internal audit function is primarily responsible for providing an independent and objective assurance and consulting service aimed at adding value and improving an organization’s operations. If internal auditors were tasked with developing controls in business procedures, it could compromise their objectivity. Objectivity is crucial as it allows auditors to carry out audits impartially and without bias. Involvement in control creation could lead internal auditors to later audit their own work, which is a conflict of interest and undermines the principle of independence and objectivity as set by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA).

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

When an internal audit activity lacks the necessary skills to perform a requested consulting engagement, the most appropriate action according to IIA guidance is for the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) to decline the engagement request. This decision ensures the integrity and quality of the audit service, adhering to the standard of only undertaking work where the internal audit staff possesses or has the ability to obtain the necessary knowledge and skills.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

The scenario described involves a violation of the principle of confidentiality as defined in The IIA's Code of Ethics. The internal auditor misused information obtained during the course of an audit (salary data of colleagues) for personal gain (requesting a salary raise). This breaches the ethical principle of confidentiality, which mandates that auditors respect the value and ownership of information they receive and do not disclose information without appropriate authority unless there is a legal or professional obligation to do so.

The IIA's Code of Ethics on Confidentiality.

According to the Standards set by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), an internal audit activity may report conformance with the Standards even if it has not been in existence for more than five years provided that it has conducted periodic self-assessments and meets the other necessary criteria of the IIA standards. External assessments are required at least once every five years, but conformance can still be reported if internal assessments are conducted in the interim.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

The internal audit activity contributes to the implementation of the risk management framework by assisting with the prioritization of identified risks. This is done through the provision of assurance and consulting services that help the organization to understand which risks are most significant and how they should be addressed based on their impact and likelihood.

IIA Performance Standards on risk management; literature on internal audit’s role in risk assessment and management.

The best evidence of conformance with the Standards concerning the proficiency required of the internal audit activity would be a listing of employee profiles and certifications. This documentation provides concrete evidence of the knowledge, skills, and competencies of the internal audit staff, ensuring that they meet the requirements set forth by the professional standards and are capable of performing their duties effectively. This also aligns with the Standards' requirement for the internal audit activity to possess the knowledge, skills, and other competencies needed to perform its responsibilities.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

The source of authority for an engagement supervisor to make contact with external parties, such as obtaining maintenance reports from a contractor, typically comes from the provisions outlined in the internal audit charter. This charter formally defines the purpose, authority, and responsibility of the internal audit activity, including interactions with third-party service providers. It is essential as it sets the audit activity's scope, allowing auditors to access necessary information and resources.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF), specifically the Audit Charter guidelines.

A risk assessment process is a crucial precondition for developing an effective system of internal controls. It helps identify and analyze risks relevant to achieving the organization’s objectives, thereby informing the design and implementation of appropriate controls to mitigate those risks. This foundational step ensures that the internal controls are aligned with the specific risk landscape of the organization.

COSO Framework on Internal Control, Principle Related to Risk Assessment

Assessing soft controls can help internal auditors in undertaking root-cause analysis because soft controls, such as corporate culture and employee behavior, often provide insights into the underlying causes of observed deficiencies. By evaluating these soft controls, auditors can identify why certain hard controls may be failing and what might be influencing employee actions and attitudes, thus facilitating a more effective audit.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) guidance on behavioral and cultural audits and risk management practices.