CIPS L4M3 - Commercial Contracting

In the contract term, the buyer agrees to pay the contractor the cost of doing project plus a profit. This is an example of cost-plus pricing arrangement.

On the other hand, "Fixed-pricing arrangement" often refers to lump-sum contract or supply/service contract with fixed price. "Incentive pricing arrangement" and "Gain-share/pain-share arrangement" have the same meaning. In this type of arrangement, both supplier and buyer agree on a target (it can be cost, or lead time, or quality, etc). Once the supplier reaches that target, it will be rewarded with a portion of the gain that the buyer gets, and will pay the price if it fails.

- A call off or a term contract is one which exists for a fixed period of time, rather than for a specific purpose

- A formal framework agreement does have some legal standing but it is not a contract, primarily because there is no consideration involved, but it is an overarching (or umbrella) agreementunder which contracts can be created (this holds true in English law but may not be right in other jurisdiction)

- A framework arrangement is a rather loose set-up, without any legal standing. It usually occurs when an organisation has decided for itself to limit the number of suppliers it is willing to work with and, through a purely internal process, sets up an approved list of such suppliers.

- A performance management framework including KPIs and targets, the assessment scheme and incentives, disincentives, bonuses and penalties. It is a schedule to a contract and only legally binding if it is referred from contract clauses.

Contracting on the supplier’s terms can pose risks for the buyer. Common disadvantages include retention of title clauses (C), where the supplier retains ownership of goods until full payment is made. Also, suppliers may include clauses allowing them to raise prices without notification (E). These terms shift risk to the buyer and reduce predictability and control.

Audit trail is a chronological record the sequence of events connected to a given transaction, such as a purchase of raw materials, payroll disbursements, or a detailed financial statement. The record includes all the source documents connected to the transaction, providing context and clarity in the event a review is required. The more comprehensive the documentation, the more effective the audit trail is when used to create financial reports, verify information, and ensure compliance while eliminating fraud.

In the scenario, the procurement team gets the quotation from phone calls and emails which have weak audit trails and lack of transparency. One solution may be increasing the use of e-procurement system.

A framework agreement is an agreement with one or more suppliers/providers which sets out terms and conditions under which individual contracts (call-offs) can be made throughout the term of the agreement.

A framework agreement itself is not a contract, but the call-offs made from it are.

Framework arrangements create a streamlined and flexible process for procuring goods, works or services

Where a framework for the same goods, works or services is awarded to several suppliers, there are three possible options for awarding call-off contracts: direct award (or direct call-off), mini-competition or a combination of both.

Option 1 – Apply the terms of the framework agreement (direct award).

Where your requirements match the terms and/or specification of the framework agreement (in the event of any query, you should clarify the situation with the organisation that established the framework), a particular call-off should be awarded without re-opening competition. The call-off should be awarded to the provider who is identified as the most economically advantageous tender based on the award criteria used at the time that the framework was established (i.e. the supplier ranked no. 1). Randomly selecting a supplier off a framework is not permitted.

Option 2 – Hold a mini-competition between capable suppliers.

If your requirements do not match the terms and/or the specification of the framework, you should conduct a mini-competition exercise. Whilst it is not permitted to substantially change the basic terms or specification of the framework, in running a mini-competition it is possible to supplement or refine the basic terms of the framework prior to making a call-off. Examples of such terms are:

- The particular goods/services/works required;

- Particular delivery timescales;

- Particular invoicing arrangements and payment profiles;

- Associated services such as installation, maintenance and training;

- Quantity;

- Functional specification.

Under no circumstances should brand names or brand-specific descriptions of goods be used e.g. BIC Biro Pen, Hewlett-Packard Printer, Dell computer. Descriptions should give reference to the characteristics and outputs of the product or service. Where no other description is possible, any reference should be qualified by adding the words ‘or equivalent’.

When a mini-competition exercise is held, all suppliers appointed to the framework that are capableof meeting the requirement must be invited to submit a tender. (This might just relate to suppliers within a particular ‘lot’). You must not limit the mini-competition exercise to selected providers. A time limit for submitting the tender must be set and advised to competing suppliers. This time limit must be reasonable, taking account of the complexity of the requirement.

The call-off must be awarded on the basis of the framework award criteria and new criteria cannot be added, although, where permitted, the weightings may be varied to take account of a particular requirement. However, in adjusting the weightings, care must be taken to ensure that any such changes do not have an adverse effect on competition.

Option 3 - Combination of direct award and mini-competition

To use a combination approach, the procurement documents must state that this route may be used. The procurement documents will also specify which terms may be subject to the re-opening of competition.

Based on two famous precedents, Fisher v. Bell (1961) and Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (1953), the display on shop window is considered as an invitation to treat. The shop owner can change the price when his customer asks to buy.

One of the advantages of using the RFQ method to procure pricing is that the company making the solicitation does not need to prepare any documentation, as requests are sent out privately. With less paperwork to prepare, turnaround times for quotes are reduced. Administration cost is also lower in compare with other procurement method like ITT or RFP. RFQ is usually used in low value purchase, where buyer knows the detailed specification and the price is the only variable that need to consider.

To use RFQ effectively, the buyer should attach the detailed specification and standard terms & conditions. The RFQ should only be sent to verified suppliers.

An incentive contract is a sub-segment of a fixed-price or cost-reimbursement contract when there are specific cost or time commitments that are desired for a project. The standard incentive contract will allow for a fixed price to be paid for work to be completed by a specific deadline and at a specific cost.

There are two major types of incentive contracts: Cost-plus-incentive fee and Fixed-price incentive (firm target) contracts. Both types have the same formula for calculating final fee and final price.

The target fee is the amount that will be paid if the actual costs (which can be proven) match thetarget costs

The actual fee will be adjusted in proportion to the difference between the target cost and the actual cost. The usual calculation is:

Target fee + ((target cost - actual cost) x Supplier share) = final fee

The final price then becomes:

Actual cost + final fee = final price

Effective KPIs should be measurable, relevant, and tied to performance. "Complaints resolved within two days" and "Delivery of goods on time and in full" are standard KPIs as they reflect quality and timeliness of service—both key to contract success. The "total number of services" and general reductions do not directly reflect performance outcomes.

Article 2 of CISG states that:

This Convention does not apply to sales:

(a) of goods bought for personal, family or household use, unless the seller, at any time before or at the conclusion of the contract, neither knew nor ought to have known that the goods were bought for any such use;

(b) by auction;

(c) on execution or otherwise by authority of law;

(d) of stocks, shares, investment securities, negotiable instruments or money;

(e) of ships, vessels, hovercraft or aircraft;

(f) of electricity.

LO 1, AC 1.2