Google Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer - Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam

The correct answer is A. Communicate your intent to the incident team. Perform a load analysis to determine if the remaining nodes can handle the increase in traffic offloaded from the removed node, and scale appropriately. When any new nodes report healthy, drain traffic from the unhealthy node, and remove the unhealthy node from service.

This answer follows the Google-recommended practices for incident management, as described in the Chapter 9 - Incident Response, Google SRE Book1. According to this source, some of the best practices are:

Maintain a clear line of command. Designate clearly defined roles. Keep a working record of debugging and mitigation as you go. Declare incidents early and often.

Communicate your intent before taking any action that might affect the service or the incident response. This helps to avoid confusion, duplication of work, or unintended consequences.

Perform a load analysis before removing a node from the load balancer pool, as this might affect the capacity and performance of the service. Scale the pool as necessary to handle the expected load.

Drain traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it from service, as this helps to avoid dropping requests or causing errors for users.

Answer A follows these best practices by communicating the intent to the incident team, performing a load analysis and scaling the pool, and draining traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it.

Answer B does not follow the best practice of performing a load analysis before adding or removing nodes, as this might cause overloading or underutilization of resources.

Answer C does not follow the best practice of communicating the intent before taking any action, as this might cause confusion or conflict with other responders.

Answer D does not follow the best practice of draining traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it, as this might cause errors for users.

Cloud Build is a fully managed continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) service that helps you automate your builds, tests, and deployments. Google Cloud Deploy is a service that automates the deployment of your applications to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE).

Together, Cloud Build and Google Cloud Deploy can be used to build and deploy your application's custom Compute Engine images to your current environment and to other cloud providers in the future.

Here are the steps involved in using Cloud Build and Google Cloud Deploy to implement a CI/CD pipeline for your application:

Create a Cloud Build trigger that fires whenever a change is made to your application's code.

In the Cloud Build trigger, configure Cloud Build to build your application's Docker image.

Create a Google Cloud Deploy configuration file that specifies how to deploy your application's Docker image to GKE.

In Google Cloud Deploy, create a deployment that uses your configuration file.

Once you have created the Cloud Build trigger and Google Cloud Deploy configuration file, any changes made to your application's code will trigger Cloud Build to build a new Docker image. Google Cloud Deploy will then deploy the new Docker image to GKE.

This solution stack is adaptable to future changes because it uses a cloud-agnostic approach. Cloud Build can be used to build Docker images for any cloud provider, and Google Cloud Deploy can be used to deploy Docker images to any Kubernetes cluster.

The other solution stacks are not as adaptable to future changes. For example, solution stack A (Cloud Build with Packer) is limited to building Docker images for Compute Engine. Solution stack C (Google Kubernetes Engine with Google Cloud Deploy) is limited to deploying Docker images to GKE. Solution stack D (Cloud Build with kpt) is a newer solution that is not yet as mature as Cloud Build and Google Cloud Deploy.

Overall, the best solution stack for implementing a CI/CD pipeline for your application in a multi-cloud environment is Cloud Build with Google Cloud Deploy. This solution stack is fully managed, cloud-agnostic, and adaptable to future changes.

https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/access-control

The logging.configWriter role grants permissions to create, update, and delete log exports. This is the correct role to give team members who need to export logs2.

https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/custom-and-external-metrics#custom_metrics

https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-stackdriver/blob/master/custom-metrics-stackdriver-adapter/README.md

Your application can report a custom metric to Cloud Monitoring. You can configure Kubernetes to respond to these metrics and scale your workload automatically. For example, you can scale your application based on metrics such as queries per second, writes per second, network performance, latency when communicating with a different application, or other metrics that make sense for your workload.https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/custom-and-external-metrics

Reason : Incident has not occurred yet, even when development team is already pushing new features multiple times a week. The option A says, to define an error budget "policy", not to define error budget(It is already present). Just simple means to bring in all stakeholders, and decide how to consume the error budget effectively that could bring balance between feature deployment and reliability.

The goals of this policy are to: -- Protect customers from repeated SLO misses -- Provide an incentive to balance reliability with other featureshttps://sre.google/workbook/error-budget-policy/

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Google Cloud Trace is specifically designed to analyze request latency and identify performance bottlenecks across services. Since the issue is related to slow performance after a new release, the best approach is to use Cloud Trace to:

Visualize request latency across services

Pinpoint slow dependencies affecting response time

Analyze performance trends over time

📌Why not other options?

B (Error Reporting)❌→ Focuses on uncaught exceptions and crashes, not latency issues.

C (Cloud Profiler)❌→ Helps with CPU and memory analysis, not request tracing.

D (Prometheus for Cloud Monitoring)❌→ Useful for metrics collection, but not ideal for debugging specific request latency issues.

📌Official Reference:

Google Cloud Trace Overview

Rollback to previous stable version. Then you need to find what is causing the issue.

The best option for creating the development and production environments for each team while minimizing costs and ensuring isolation is to create a development and a production GKE cluster in separate projects, in each cluster create a Kubernetes namespace per team, and then configure Kubernetes role-based access control (RBAC) so that each team can only access its own namespace. This option allows you to use fewer clusters and projects than creating one project or cluster per team, which reduces costs and complexity. It also allows you to isolate each team’s environment by using namespaces and RBAC, which prevents teams from accessing other teams’ environments.

SLIs are quantitative measures of service behavior. For reliability, success rate (successful vs. total requests) is the most fundamental metric.

“The most common SLIs are request success rate, availability, and latency.”

— Google SRE Workbook: Implementing SLIs

“Availability SLIs often look like ‘the fraction of requests that succeed.’”

— Google SRE Book

Option C directly maps to this definition and is the most accurate and measurable indicator of overall reliability.

The Standard Tier network service offers lower network costs than the Premium Tier. This is the correct option to reduce the network cost for the application3.