Google Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer - Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud Security Engineer

The problem states that Google Cloud applications need to access external web services and requires the ability to monitor, control, and log this access.

Monitoring, Controlling, and Logging external web access: This specifically points to a proxy solution, which can intercept, inspect, and log HTTP/S traffic.

Secure Web Proxy (SWP): Google Cloud's Secure Web Proxy is designed for exactly this use case. It acts as an explicit forward proxy for HTTP(S) traffic, allowing organizations to implement granular access controls, inspect traffic for security threats, and log all outbound web requests from their Google Cloud environment.Extract Reference: "Secure Web Proxy is a managed service that lets you deploy and manage an explicit forward proxy to protect your organization's internal resources from web-based threats and to control access to external web applications." and "With Secure Web Proxy, you can: Enforce granular access policies based on different attributes, Log all HTTP(S) requests that are handled by the proxy, and Monitor web traffic for threats." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/secure-web-proxy)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Configure VPC firewall rules to allow the services to access the IP addresses of required external web services: VPC firewall rules operate at Layer 4 (TCP/UDP) and Layer 3 (IP). While they can allow or deny traffic to specific IP addresses and ports, they cannot monitor, control, or log HTTP/S requests at the application layer. They don't provide granular control over which web services are accessed or inspect the content of the requests.

C. Configure Google Cloud Armor to monitor and protect your applications by checking incoming traffic patterns for attack patterns: Google Cloud Armor is primarily a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection and Web Application Firewall (WAF) service. It focuses on protecting applications from incoming threats (ingress traffic), not controlling and logging outgoing access to external web services.

D. Set up a Cloud NAT instance to allow egress traffic from your VPC: Cloud NAT allows instances without external IP addresses to connect to the internet. While it enables egress, it does not provide monitoring, control, or logging capabilities for specific web services at the application layer. It's a network address translation service, not an application-layer proxy.

Therefore, setting up a Secure Web Proxy is the most appropriate solution to meet the requirements of monitoring, controlling, and logging access to external web services from Google Cloud applications.

By default, Vertex AI uses a "Service Agent" (a Google-managed service account) which often has broad permissions across the project. To achieve isolation and least privilege, you must use Custom Service Accounts for each training job.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Use a custom service account for Vertex AI):

"When you perform custom training, you can configure Vertex AI to use a custom service account. This allows you to grant the job only the specific permissions it needs (e.g., access to a specific Cloud Storage bucket) rather than using the default service agent which may have broader access. This is the recommended practice for multi-tenant or highly regulated environments."

Implementation Strategy:

Identity: Create a unique User-Managed Service Account (UMSA) for each specific training workload or team.

Permissions: Grant that UMSA the roles/storage.objectViewer (or Legacy Reader) only on the specific bucket containing the training data.

Job Config: When submitting the Vertex AI job, specify the serviceAccount field in the job request.

Why other options are incorrect:

A is incorrect: Using one custom service account for all jobs still doesn't provide isolation between the jobs themselves.

B and C are incorrect: These use the default service agent, which is shared across the project. If one job is compromised or misconfigured, it could potentially access data intended for other jobs because they share the same identity.

Implied IPv4 allow egress rule. An egress rule whose action is allow, destination is 0.0.0.0/0, and priority is the lowest possible (65535) lets any instance send traffic to any destination

Implied IPv4 deny ingress rule. An ingress rule whose action is deny, source is 0.0.0.0/0, and priority is the lowest possible (65535) protects all instances by blocking incoming connections to them.

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/firewalls?hl=en#default_firewall_rules

https://cloud.google.com/network-intelligence-center/docs/firewall-insights/concepts/overview#shadowed-firewall-rules

Firewall Insights analyzes your firewall rules to detect firewall rules that are shadowed by other rules. A shadowed rule is a firewall rule that has all of its relevant attributes, such as its IP address and port ranges, overlapped by attributes from one or more rules with higher or equal priority, called shadowing rules.

The problem is that the on-premises developers cannot resolve the Artifact Registry hostname, and they have no route to the internet. This is a classic DNS resolution problem in a hybrid network using private API access.

Artifact Registry is a Google-managed service, and its hostname (e.g., us-west1-docker.pkg.dev) resolves to a Google API domain. To access Google services privately from an on-premises network without an internet route, the traffic must be directed to Private Google Access IP ranges.

Issue: The on-premises DNS cannot resolve the Google service domain to the required private IP range.

Solution: The on-premises DNS needs a record (or a forwarding rule) to resolve the Google service domain to the dedicated IP ranges used for Private Google Access, specifically restricted.googleapis.com or private.googleapis.com (which provide the IP addresses for private access).

Extracts (Conceptual Basis):

"To direct traffic privately, you must ensure that your on-premises network's DNS is configured to resolve Google API and service domain names to the IP address range for Private Google Access." (Source 1.1)

"The IP addresses for private.googleapis.com are used for Private Google Access. To enable on-premises hosts to access Google APIs and services using this method, you must configure on-premises DNS to resolve requests for Google API domain names to the IP address range for private.googleapis.com." (Source 1.2)

Option B is incorrect because Private Google Access (PGA) is enabled on the VPC subnet, allowing VMs within the VPC to access Google APIs. However, the problem is with the on-premises developers; the on-premises DNS must be configured to resolve the hostname correctly.

To ensure that an external user cannot gain access to an internal application on Google App Engine even if an employee’s password is compromised, configure Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP).

Enable IAP:

Go to the Cloud Console, navigate to the App Engine application, and select "Identity-Aware Proxy".

Enable IAP for the application.

Configure Access Policies:

Set up access policies to restrict who can access the application.

Use IAM roles to grant access only to specific users or groups.

Enforce Authentication:

IAP enforces Google authentication, ensuring that users must log in with their GSuite credentials.

Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA):

Enforce 2FA for all GSuite users to add an extra layer of security.

Advantages:

Protection against Compromised Credentials: Even if passwords are compromised, attackers cannot access the application without passing IAP authentication.

Centralized Access Management: Easily manage and monitor access through IAM and IAP policies.

Identity-Aware Proxy Overview

Setting up IAP

To prevent developers from creating user-managed service account keys and reduce the risk of key mismanagement, you should enable an organization policy that specifically prohibits the creation of these keys.

Enable an organization policy to prevent service account keys from being created (C):

Google Cloud provides the capability to enforce organizational policies that restrict various actions, including the creation of service account keys. By enabling this policy, you ensure that developers cannot create new user-managed service account keys, thus minimizing the risk of key mismanagement and potential security breaches.

References

Service Accounts documentation

Organization Policy Service documentation

If a user loses their second factor for 2-Step Verification (2SV), you can help them regain access with minimal risk by generating a backup code.

Generate a Backup Code (A):

In the Google Admin console, navigate to the user's account settings.

Generate a backup code for the user. This code allows them to sign in despite not having access to their usual second factor.

Instruct the user to log in using the backup code and then update their second factor in their account settings.

This method ensures that only the affected user’s access is temporarily adjusted, minimizing risk while maintaining overall security policies.

References

Google Admin console 2-Step Verification documentation

The problem requires restricting the types of Google Cloud services that can be deployed within specific folders to enforce compliance, without affecting other parts of the resource hierarchy, using the most efficient and simple method.

Organization Policies: Organization policies allow you to define centralized, programmatic controls over your Google Cloud resources. They apply hierarchically, meaning a policy set on a folder applies to all projects and resources within that folder and its descendants.

Restrict Resource Service Usage Constraint: This specific organization policy constraint is designed precisely for controlling which Google Cloud services can be used (and thus deployed/created resources for) within a given part of the resource hierarchy. It supports both allowlists and denylists of service API identifiers.

Extract Reference: "The Restrict Resource Service Usage constraint controls the runtime access to all in-scope resources." and "This constraint can be used in two mutually exclusive ways: Denylist - resources of any service that isn't denied are allowed. Allowlist - resources of any service that isn't allowed are denied." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Restricting resource usage | Resource Manager Documentation" - https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/restricting-resources)

Folder-Level Application: Applying this organization policy at the folder level directly meets the requirement of applying restrictions "only to the designated folders without affecting other parts of the resource hierarchy." This is more efficient and simpler than applying a global policy with numerous exceptions.

Let's evaluate the other options:

B. Implement IAM conditions on service account creation within each folder: IAM conditions control permissions for who can do what. While they can be used for very fine-grained access control, they are not designed to restrict the types of services that can be deployed directly. Controlling service account creation doesn't prevent a user with appropriate permissions from deploying other resources.

C. Create a global organization policy... and apply exceptions: While technically possible, this is less efficient and simple if the goal is to only restrict specific folders. Managing exceptions for the entire rest of the organization would be more complex than simply applying the policy directly where it's needed.

D. Configure VPC Service Controls perimeters around each folder: VPC Service Controls primarily prevent data exfiltration and restrict API access at a network perimeter level. They are not designed to restrict which types of Google Cloud services can be deployed within a project or folder; rather, they control how allowed services interact with each other and with external endpoints.

Therefore, creating an organization policy with the "Restrict Resource Service Usage" constraint at the folder level is the most efficient, simple, and direct method to achieve the stated goal.

This question combines two powerful security features: VPC Service Controls (VPC SC) for data exfiltration prevention and Context-Aware Access (CAA) for fine-grained user access based on context.

Contextual Requirement: Requiring a "company-managed device," "specific location," etc., is the function of Context-Aware Access (CAA), implemented via an Access Level.

Combining VPC SC and CAA: CAA policies can be integrated with VPC SC perimeters to enforce the context for access into the perimeter.

Evaluating Impact: To evaluate changes without blocking access, the entire VPC SC perimeter (including the new CAA rule) should be configured in dry run mode.

Extracts:

"Context-Aware Access (CAA) allows you to define and enforce granular access to Google Cloud resources based on user attributes like device security status, IP address (location), and identity." (Source 3.1)

"When implementing a new security policy... it is best practice to initially configure the VPC Service Controls perimeter (including any associated Access Levels/Context-Aware Access) in dry run mode. Dry run mode allows you to test the perimeter's effect on services without blocking any access." (Source 3.2)

"You can use an Access Level (the core component of CAA) to define the conditions for accessing resources protected by a Service Perimeter." (Source 3.3)