Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer - Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer

Option A is correct because using Vertex AI Workbench user-managed notebooks to generate the report is the best way to quickly determine whether the data is suitable for model development, and to create a one-time report that includes both informative visualizations of data distributions and more sophisticated statistical analyses to share with other ML engineers on your team. Vertex AI Workbench is a service that allows you to create and use notebooks for ML development and experimentation. You can use Vertex AI Workbench to connect to your BigQuery table, query and analyze the data using SQL or Python, and create interactive charts and plots using libraries such as pandas, matplotlib, or seaborn. You can also use Vertex AI Workbench to perform more advanced data analysis, such as outlier detection, feature engineering, or hypothesis testing, using libraries such as TensorFlow Data Validation, TensorFlow Transform, or SciPy. You can export your notebook as a PDF or HTML file, and share it with your team. Vertex AI Workbench provides maximum flexibility to create your report, as you can use any code or library that you want, and customize the report as you wish.

Option B is incorrect because using Google Data Studio to create the report is not the most flexible way to quickly determine whether the data is suitable for model development, and to create a one-time report that includes both informative visualizations of data distributions and more sophisticated statistical analyses to share with other ML engineers on your team. Google Data Studio is a service that allows you to create and share interactive dashboards and reports using data from various sources, such as BigQuery, Google Sheets, or Google Analytics. You can use Google Data Studio to connect to your BigQuery table, explore and visualize the data using charts, tables, or maps, and apply filters, calculations, or aggregations to the data. However, Google Data Studio does not support more sophisticated statistical analyses, such as outlier detection, feature engineering, or hypothesis testing, which may be useful for model development. Moreover, Google Data Studio is more suitable for creating recurring reports that need to be updated frequently, rather than one-time reports that are static.

Option C is incorrect because using the output from TensorFlow Data Validation on Dataflow to generate the report is not the most efficient way to quickly determine whether the data is suitable for model development, and to create a one-time report that includes both informative visualizations of data distributions and more sophisticated statistical analyses to share with other ML engineers on your team. TensorFlow Data Validation is a library that allows you to explore, validate, and monitor the quality of your data for ML. You can use TensorFlow Data Validation to compute descriptive statistics, detect anomalies, infer schemas, and generate data visualizations for your data. Dataflow is a service that allows you to create and run scalable data processing pipelines using Apache Beam. You can use Dataflow to run TensorFlow Data Validation on large datasets, such as those stored in BigQuery. However, this option is not very efficient, as it involves moving the data from BigQuery to Dataflow, creating and running the pipeline, and exporting the results. Moreover, this option does not provide maximum flexibility to create your report, as you are limited by the functionalities of TensorFlow Data Validation, and you may not be able to customize the report as you wish.

Option D is incorrect because using Dataprep to create the report is not the most flexible way to quickly determine whether the data is suitable for model development, and to create a one-time report that includes both informative visualizations of data distributions and more sophisticated statistical analyses to share with other ML engineers on your team. Dataprep is a service that allows you to explore, clean, and transform your data for analysis or ML. You can use Dataprep to connect to your BigQuery table, inspect and profile the data using histograms, charts, or summary statistics, and apply transformations, such as filtering, joining, splitting, or aggregating, to the data. However, Dataprep does not support more sophisticated statistical analyses, such as outlier detection, feature engineering, or hypothesis testing, which may be useful for model development. Moreover, Dataprep is more suitable for creating data preparation workflows that need to be executed repeatedly, rather than one-time reports that are static.

References:

Vertex AI Workbench documentation

Google Data Studio documentation

TensorFlow Data Validation documentation

Dataflow documentation

Dataprep documentation

[BigQuery documentation]

[pandas documentation]

[matplotlib documentation]

[seaborn documentation]

[TensorFlow Transform documentation]

[SciPy documentation]

[Apache Beam documentation]

 Cloud Storage is a scalable and cost-effective storage service for any type of data. By storing image files in Cloud Storage, you can access them from anywhere and avoid the overhead of managing your own storage infrastructure. However, accessing image files directly from Cloud Storage can be slow and inefficient, especially for large-scale training. A better option is to use serialized records, such as TFRecord or Apache Avro, which are binary formats that store multiple images and their labels in a single file. Serialized records can improve the data throughput and reduce the network latency, as well as enable data compression and sharding. You can use TensorFlow or Apache Beam APIs to create and read serialized records from Cloud Storage. This solution requires minimal code changes and can speed up your training time significantly. References:

Cloud Storage | Google Cloud

TFRecord and tf.Example | TensorFlow Core

Apache Avro 1.10.2 Specification

Using Apache Beam with Cloud Storage | Cloud Storage

 AutoML Tables is a service that allows you to automatically build, analyze, and deploy machine learning models on tabular data. It is suitable for large-scale regression and classification problems, and it supports various optimization objectives, data splitting methods, and hyperparameter tuning algorithms. AutoML Tables can handle both categorical and numerical features, and it can also handle missing values and outliers. AutoML Tables is a good choice for this problem because it minimizes the effort and training time required to train a regression model, while maximizing the model performance.

RMSLE stands for Root Mean Squared Logarithmic Error, and it is a metric that measures the average difference between the logarithm of the predicted values and the logarithm of the actual values. RMSLE is useful for regression problems where the target variable can include negative values, and where large differences between small values are more important than large differences between large values. For example, RMSLE penalizes underestimating a value of 10 by 2 more than overestimating a value of 1000 by 20. RMSLE is a good optimization objective for this problem because it can handle negative values in the target variable, and it can reduce the impact of outliers and large errors.

For more information about AutoML Tables and RMSLE, see the following references:

AutoML Tables: end-to-end workflows on AI Platform Pipelines

Predict workload failures before they happen with AutoML Tables

How to Calculate RMSE in R

The class imbalance problem is a common challenge in machine learning, especially in classification tasks. It occurs when the distribution of the target classes is highly skewed, such that one class (the majority class) has much more examples than the other class (the minority class). The minority class is often the more interesting or important class, such as failure incidents, fraud cases, or rare diseases. However, most machine learning algorithms are designed to optimize the overall accuracy, which can be biased towards the majority class and ignore the minority class. This can result in poor predictive performance, especially for the minority class.

There are different techniques to deal with the class imbalance problem, such as data-level methods, algorithm-level methods, and evaluation-level methods1. Data-level methods involve resampling the original dataset to create a more balanced class distribution. There are two main types of data-level methods: oversampling and undersampling. Oversampling methods increase the number of examples in the minority class, either by duplicating existing examples or by generating synthetic examples. Undersampling methods reduce the number of examples in the majority class, either by randomly removing examples or by using clustering or other criteria to select representative examples. Both oversampling and undersampling methods can be combined with upweighting or downweighting, which assign different weights to the examples according to their class frequency, to further balance the dataset.

For the use case of investigating failures of a production line component based on sensor readings, the best option is to downsample the data with upweighting to create a sample with 10% positive examples. This option involves randomly removing some of the negative examples (the majority class) until the ratio of positive to negative examples is 1:9, and then assigning higher weights to the positive examples to compensate for their low frequency. This option can create a more balanced dataset that can improve the performance of the classification models, while preserving the diversity and representativeness of the original data. This option can also reduce the computation time and memory usage, as the size of the dataset is reduced. Therefore, downsampling the data with upweighting to create a sample with 10% positive examples is the best option for this use case.

References:

A Systematic Study of the Class Imbalance Problem in Convolutional Neural Networks

 Transfer learning is a technique that leverages the knowledge and weights of a pre-trained model and adapts them to a new task or domain1. Transfer learning can save time and resources by avoiding training a model from scratch, and can also improve the performance and generalization of the model by using a larger and more diverse dataset2. AI Platform provides several established text classification models that can be used for transfer learning, such as BERT, ALBERT, or XLNet3. These models are based on state-of-the-art natural language processing techniques and can handle various text classification tasks, such as sentiment analysis, topic classification, or spam detection4. By using one of these models on AI Platform, you can customize the model’s code, serving, and deployment, and use Kubeflow pipelines for the ML platform. Therefore, using an established text classification model on AI Platform to perform transfer learning is the best option for this use case.

References:

Transfer Learning - Machine Learning’s Next Frontier

A Comprehensive Hands-on Guide to Transfer Learning with Real-World Applications in Deep Learning

Text classification models

Text Classification with Pre-trained Models in TensorFlow

 The main advantage of implementing machine learning for this business case is that new problematic phrases can be identified in spam posts. This is because machine learning can learn from the data and the feedback, and adapt to the changing patterns and trends of spam posts. Machine learning can also capture the semantic and contextual meaning of the posts, and not just rely on the presence or absence of keywords. By using machine learning, you can improve the accuracy and coverage of your anti-spam service, and detect new and emerging types of spam posts that may not be captured by the keyword list.

The other options are not advantages of implementing machine learning for this business case for the following reasons:

A. Posts can be compared to the keyword list much more quickly is not an advantage, as it does not improve the quality or effectiveness of the anti-spam service. It only improves the efficiency of the service, which is not the primary objective. Moreover, machine learning may not necessarily be faster than the keyword list, depending on the complexity and size of the model and the data.

C. A much longer keyword list can be used to flag spam posts is not an advantage, as it does not address the limitations or challenges of the keyword list approach. It only increases the size and complexity of the keyword list, which can make it harder to maintain and update. Moreover, a longer keyword list may not improve the accuracy or coverage of the anti-spam service, as it may introduce more false positives or false negatives, or miss new and emerging types of spam posts.

D. Spam posts can be flagged using far fewer keywords is not an advantage, as it does not reflect the capabilities or benefits of machine learning. It only reduces the size and complexity of the keyword list, which can make it easier to maintain and update. However, using fewer keywords may not improve the accuracy or coverage of the anti-spam service, as it may lose some information or meaning of the posts, or miss some types of spam posts.

References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Machine Learning for Spam Detection

Spam Detection Using Machine Learning

To develop a credit risk model that meets the regulatory requirements and can be monitored over time, you should follow these steps:

Use Vertex Explainable AI with the sampled Shapley method. Vertex Explainable AI is a service that provides feature attributions for machine learning models, which can help you understand how each feature contributes to the prediction1. The sampled Shapley method is a technique that estimates the Shapley values for each feature, which are based on the marginal contribution of each feature to the prediction across all possible feature subsets2. The sampled Shapley method is suitable for neural networks and other complex models, as it can capture the non-linear and interaction effects of the features3.

Enable Vertex AI Model Monitoring to check for feature distribution drift. Vertex AI Model Monitoring is a service that helps you track and manage the performance and quality of your deployed models over time4. Feature distribution drift is a type of data drift that occurs when the distribution of the input features changes significantly from the training data, which can affect the model accuracy and reliability. By checking for feature distribution drift, you can detect when your model needs to be retrained or updated with new data.

References:

1: Introduction to Vertex Explainable AI | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

2: Shapley value - Wikipedia

3: Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning

4: Introduction to Vertex AI Model Monitoring | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

[5]: Monitor models for data drift | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

The best option to stabilize the pipeline without downgrading the evaluation quality while minimizing infrastructure overhead is to use Dataflow as the runner for the evaluation step. Dataflow is a fully managed service for executing Apache Beam pipelines that can scale up and down according to the workload. Dataflow can handle large-scale, distributed data processing tasks such as model evaluation, and it can also integrate with Vertex AI Pipelines and TensorFlow Extended (TFX). By using the flag -runner=DataflowRunner in beam_pipeline_args, you can instruct the Evaluator component to run the evaluation step on Dataflow, instead of using the default DirectRunner, which runs locally and may cause out-of-memory errors. Option A is incorrect because adding tfma.MetricsSpec() to limit the number of metrics in the evaluation step may downgrade the evaluation quality, as some important metrics may be omitted. Moreover, reducing the number of metrics may not solve the out-of-memory error, as the evaluation step may still consume a lot of memory depending on the size and complexity of the data and the model. Option B is incorrect because migrating the pipeline to Kubeflow hosted on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) may increase the infrastructure overhead, as you need to provision, manage, and monitor the GKE cluster yourself. Moreover, you need to specify the appropriate node parameters for the evaluation step, which may require trial and error to find the optimal configuration. Option D is incorrect because moving the evaluation step out of the pipeline and running it on custom Compute Engine VMs may also increase the infrastructure overhead, as you need to create, configure, and delete the VMs yourself. Moreover, you need to ensure that the VMs have sufficient memory for the evaluation step, which may require trial and error to find the optimal machine type. References:

Dataflow documentation

Using DataflowRunner

Evaluator component documentation

Configuring the Evaluator component