Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 - AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03)

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to store a copy of all new photos in the us-east-1 Region from an S3 bucket in the us-west-1 Region.

Analysis of Options:

Cross-Region Replication: Automatically replicates objects across regions with minimal operational effort once configured.

CORS Configuration: Used for allowing resources on a web page to be requested from another domain, not for replication.

S3 Lifecycle Rule: Manages the transition of objects between storage classes within the same bucket, not for cross-region replication.

S3 Event Notifications with Lambda: Requires additional configuration and management compared to Cross-Region Replication.

Best Solution:

S3 Cross-Region Replication: This solution provides an automated and efficient way to replicate objects to another region, meeting the requirement with the least operational effort.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to keep daily EBS snapshots for 1 month and retain monthly snapshots for 7 years due to new regulations.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Glacier Deep Archive: Moving snapshots to S3 Glacier Deep Archive involves additional complexity and might not be the most straightforward approach for EBS snapshots.

EBS Snapshots Archive: This is a cost-effective solution designed specifically for long-term storage of EBS snapshots.

Standard Tier for 7 Years: Keeping snapshots in the standard tier for 7 years is more expensive and does not optimize costs.

EBS Direct APIs to S3: This involves additional operational overhead and is not the most cost-effective approach compared to using EBS Snapshots Archive.

Best Solution:

EBS Snapshots Archive: Adding a policy to move monthly snapshots to the EBS Snapshots Archive for long-term retention is the most cost-effective and administratively simple solution.

Requirement Analysis: The application was overwhelmed with unexpected data volume, leading to data loss and the need for a replay mechanism.

Amazon SQS Overview: SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that decouples and scales microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications.

Data Decoupling: By using an SQS queue, the application can store incoming tracker data reliably and process it asynchronously, preventing data loss.

Implementation:

Create an SQS queue.

Modify the web application to send incoming data to the SQS queue.

Configure the application instances to poll the SQS queue and process the messages.

Conclusion: This solution meets the requirements with minimal operational overhead, ensuring data is not lost and can be processed at the application’s own pace.

References

Amazon SQS:Amazon SQS Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The application running on EC2 instances in a private subnet needs to process sensitive information from an S3 bucket without using the internet.

Analysis of Options:

Internet Gateway: This would expose the application to the internet, which is not suitable for accessing sensitive information securely.

VPN Connection: VPN is primarily used for secure connections between on-premises networks and AWS VPCs, not for direct S3 access within the same VPC.

NAT Gateway: This allows instances in a private subnet to connect to the internet, but the goal is to avoid internet access.

VPC Endpoint: Provides a private connection between the VPC and S3 without using the internet, ensuring secure access to the S3 bucket.

Best Solution:

VPC Endpoint: Configuring a VPC endpoint allows secure, private communication between the EC2 instances and the S3 bucket without using the internet, ensuring data security and compliance.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to transfer 50 TB of data to AWS with minimal operational overhead and no available network bandwidth for the transfer. The transformation job must continue running in the AWS Cloud.

Analysis of Options:

AWS DataSync and AWS Glue: DataSync is suitable for online data transfer, but there is no available network bandwidth. AWS Glue can be used for data transformation but does not solve the bandwidth issue.

AWS Snowcone: Snowcone is a smaller device suitable for smaller data transfers, and deploying the transformation application on it may not be feasible for 50 TB of data.

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with Glue: This device is designed for large data transfers. Copying the data to the device is straightforward, and AWS Glue can handle data transformation in the cloud.

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with EC2: This involves setting up EC2 instances for transformation, adding operational complexity compared to using AWS Glue.

Best Solution:

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with AWS Glue: This provides the least operational overhead for transferring large amounts of data and setting up the transformation job in the cloud.

Understanding the Requirement: The data must be encrypted at rest with automatic key rotation every year, with minimal operational overhead.

Analysis of Options:

SSE-S3: This option provides encryption with S3 managed keys and automatic key rotation but offers less control and flexibility compared to KMS keys.

AWS KMS with Customer Managed Key (automatic rotation): This option offers full control over encryption keys, with AWS KMS handling automatic key rotation, minimizing operational overhead.

AWS KMS with Customer Managed Key (manual rotation): This requires manual intervention for key rotation, increasing operational overhead.

Customer Key Material: This involves more complex management, including importing key material and setting up automatic rotation, which increases operational overhead.

Best Option for Minimal Operational Overhead:

AWS KMS with a customer managed key and automatic rotation provides the needed security and key rotation with minimal operational effort. Setting the S3 bucket’s default encryption to use this key ensures all data is encrypted as required.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to cost-optimize their workload that uses EC2, Lambda, Fargate, and SageMaker, covering the most services with the fewest savings plans.

Analysis of Options:

EC2 Instance Savings Plan: Limited to EC2 and SageMaker, missing coverage for Lambda and Fargate.

Compute Savings Plan: Provides the most flexibility, covering a broad range of compute services, including EC2, Lambda, Fargate, and SageMaker.

SageMaker Savings Plan: Specifically for SageMaker, missing coverage for EC2, Lambda, and Fargate.

Combination of plans: The Compute Savings Plan is versatile and can be combined to cover different services efficiently.

Best Solution:

Compute Savings Plan for EC2, Lambda, and SageMaker: Covers the primary compute services efficiently.

Compute Savings Plan for Lambda, Fargate, and EC2: Covers the remaining services, ensuring broad coverage with minimal plans.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to maximize cost savings for their application over the next three years, with the flexibility to change the instance family and sizes within the next six months based on application popularity and usage.

Analysis of Options:

Compute Savings Plan: This plan offers the most flexibility, allowing the company to change instance families, sizes, and regions. It applies to EC2, AWS Fargate, and AWS Lambda, offering significant cost savings with this flexibility.

EC2 Instance Savings Plan: This plan is less flexible than the Compute Savings Plan, as it only applies to EC2 instances and allows changes within a specific instance family.

Zonal Reserved Instances: These provide a discount on EC2 instances but are tied to a specific availability zone and instance type, offering the least flexibility.

Standard Reserved Instances: These offer discounts on EC2 instances but with more restrictions compared to Savings Plans, particularly when changing instance types and families.

Best Option for Flexibility and Savings:

The Compute Savings Plan is the most cost-effective solution because it allows the company to maintain flexibility while still achieving significant cost savings. This is critical for adapting to changing application demands without being locked into specific instance types or families.

Requirement Analysis: The product catalog search is causing high CPU utilization on the MySQL DB instance, slowing down the website.

ElastiCache Overview: Amazon ElastiCache for Redis can be used to cache frequently accessed data, reducing load on the database.

Lazy Loading: This caching strategy loads data into the cache only when it is requested, improving response times for repeated queries.

Implementation:

Set up an ElastiCache for Redis cluster.

Modify the application to check the cache before querying the database.

Use lazy loading to populate the cache on cache misses.

Conclusion: This approach reduces database load and improves website performance during product catalog searches.

References

Amazon ElastiCache:ElastiCache Documentation

Caching Strategies:ElastiCache Caching Strategies

The most cost-effective solution for serving video content with different bitrates is to store multiple versions of each video inAmazon S3. S3 provides scalable and cost-effective storage for largemedia files. Serving the videos from a single Amazon EC2 instance ensures low-latency delivery, and S3 storage helps minimize costs.

Option A (ElastiCache): Caching large video files in memory would be prohibitively expensive and unnecessary.

Option B (Auto Scaling group): Using Auto Scaling groups to serve video is less cost-effective compared to leveraging S3 for static storage.

Option D (Kinesis Video Streams): Kinesis Video Streams is designed for real-time video streaming and is not suitable for storing and serving pre-recorded videos.

AWS References:

Amazon S3 for Media Storage

When designing a microservice architecture where each microservice interacts with different AWS services, it's essential to follow the principle of least privilege. This means granting each microservice only the permissions it needs to perform its tasks, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or accidental actions.

The recommended approach is to create individualIAM roleswith policies that grant each microservice the specific permissions it requires. Then, these roles should be associated with the EC2 instances that run the corresponding microservice. By doing so, each EC2 instance will assume its specific IAM role, and permissions will be automatically managed by AWS.

IAM roles provide temporary credentials via the instance metadata service, eliminating the need to hard-code credentials in your application code, which enhances security.

AWS References:

IAM Roles for Amazon EC2explains how EC2 instances can use IAM roles to securely access AWS services without managing long-term credentials.

Best Practices for IAMincludes recommendations for implementing the least privilege principle and using IAM roles effectively.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Assign an IAM user to each microservice: This requires managing long-term credentials (access keys), which should be avoided. Storing keys in application code is insecure and creates a maintenance burden.

B. Create a single IAM role: This violates the principle of least privilege, as a single role with broad permissions across all services is less secure.

C. Use AWS Organizations: This approach adds unnecessary complexity. Managing permissions at the account level for each microservice is excessive for this use case and doesn't adhere to the principle of least privilege.

Cluster Placement Group: This type of placement group is designed to provide low-latency network performance and high throughput by grouping instances within a single Availability Zone. It is ideal for applications that require tightly coupled node-to-node communication.

Configuration:

When launching EC2 instances, specify the option to launch them in a cluster placement group.

This ensures that the instances are physically located close to each other, reducing latency and increasing network throughput.

Benefits:

Low-Latency Communication: Instances in a cluster placement group benefit from enhanced networking capabilities, enabling low-latency communication.

High Network Throughput: The network performance within a cluster placement group is optimized for high throughput, which is essential for HPC workloads.

This solution is the most cost-effective and efficient way to break down costs per application.

Tagging Resources: By tagging all AWS resources with a specific key (e.g., "cost") and a value representing the application's name, you can easily identify and categorize costs associated with each application. This tagging strategy allows for granular tracking of costs within AWS.

Activating Cost Allocation Tags: Once tags are applied to resources, you need to activate cost allocation tags in the AWS Billing and Cost Management console. This ensures that the costs associated with each tag are included in your billing reports and can be used for cost analysis.

AWS Cost Explorer: Cost Explorer is a powerful tool that allows you to visualize, understand, and manage your AWS costs and usage over time. You can filter and group your cost data by the tags you’ve applied to resources, enabling you to easily see the cost breakdown for each application. Cost Explorer also supports generating regular reports, which can be scheduled and emailed to stakeholders.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (AWS Budgets): AWS Budgets is more focused on setting cost and usage thresholds and monitoring them, rather than providing detailed cost breakdowns by application.

Option B (Load Cost and Usage Reports into RDS): This approach is less cost-effective and involves more operational overhead, as it requires setting up and maintaining an RDS instance and running SQL queries.

Option D (AWS Billing and Cost Management Console): While you can download bills, this method is more manual and less dynamic compared to using Cost Explorer with activated tags.

AWS References:

AWS Tagging Strategies- Overview of how to use tagging to organize and track AWS resources.

AWS Cost Explorer- Details on how to use Cost Explorer to analyze costs.

To achieve high availability for the website, two key actions should be taken:

Amazon RDS for MySQL Multi-AZ: By migrating the database to an RDS for MySQL Multi-AZ deployment, the database becomes highly available. Multi-AZ provides automatic failover from the primary database to a standby replica in another Availability Zone, ensuring database availability even in the case of an AZ failure.

Application Load Balancer and Auto Scaling: Deploying an Application Load Balancer (ALB) in front of the EC2 instances ensures that traffic is evenly distributed across the instances. Configuring an Auto Scaling group to run EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones ensures that the application remains available even if one instance or one AZ becomes unavailable. This setup enhances fault tolerance and improves reliability.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (Internet Gateway per AZ): Internet Gateways are region-wide resources and do not need to be provisioned per Availability Zone. This option does not contribute to high availability.

Option C (DynamoDB + Auto Scaling): DynamoDB would require changes to the application code to switch from MySQL, which is not possible per the question's constraints.

Option D (DataSync): AWS DataSync is used for data transfer and synchronization, not for achieving high availability for a database.

AWS References:

Amazon RDS Multi-AZ Deployments- Explanation of how Multi-AZ deployments work in Amazon RDS.

Application Load Balancing- Details on how to configure and use ALB for distributing traffic across multiple instances.

Option B: FSx for Lustre is designed for HPC workloads with high IOPS.

Option E: A cluster placement group ensures low-latency networking for HPC analytics workloads.

Option A: Amazon EFS is not optimized for HPC.

Option D: Mountpoint for S3 does not meet high IOPS needs.

EC2 Account Attributes: Amazon EC2 allows you to set account attributes to automatically encrypt new EBS volumes. This ensures that all new volumes created in your account are encrypted by default.

Configuration Steps:

Go to the EC2 Dashboard.

Select "Account Attributes" and then "EBS encryption".

Enable default EBS encryption and select the default AWS KMS key or a customer-managed key.

Prevention of Unencrypted Volumes: By setting this account attribute, you ensure that it is not possible to create unencrypted EBS volumes, thereby enforcing compliance with security requirements.

Operational Efficiency: This solution requires minimal configuration changes and provides automatic enforcement of encryption policies, reducing operational overhead.

CloudFront Signed URLs: These URLs allow you to provide limited access to content that is being served through an Amazon CloudFront distribution. Signed URLs can be generated to grant time-limited access to premium customers.

Content Restriction:

By using CloudFront signed URLs, you can control access to your media streams and file content stored in S3.

These URLs can be customized with an expiration time, ensuring that access is only available for a specific period, which is useful for scenarios like movie rentals or music downloads.

Security and Flexibility:

Signed URLs ensure that only authenticated users (premium customers) can access the restricted content.

This approach integrates seamlessly with CloudFront and S3, providing an efficient way to manage access controls without additional overhead.

Operational Efficiency: Using CloudFront signed URLs leverages AWS managed services to handle the complexity of access control, reducing the need for custom implementation and maintenance.

The best solution to enforce encryption at rest for Amazon EBS volumes is to use anIAM policyto restrict the creation of unencrypted volumes. To automatically identify and remediate unencryptedvolumes, you can useAWS Configrules, which continuously monitor the compliance of resources, andAWS Systems Managerto automate the remediation by encrypting existing unencrypted volumes. This setup requires minimal administrative overhead while ensuring compliance.

Option B (KMS): KMS is for managing encryption keys, but Config and Systems Manager provide a better solution for automatic detection and enforcement.

Option C (Macie): Macie is for data classification and is not suitable for this use case.

Option D (Inspector): Inspector is used for security vulnerabilities, not encryption compliance.

AWS References:

AWS Config Rules

AWS Systems Manager

To analyze the performance of the web application with granularity of no more than 2 minutes, enablingdetailed monitoringon EC2 instances is the best solution. By default, CloudWatch provides metrics at a 5-minute interval. Enabling detailed monitoring allows you to collect metrics at 1-minute intervals, which will give you the level of granularity you need to analyze performance during peak traffic.

Amazon CloudWatch metrics can then be used to analyze CPU utilization, memory usage, disk I/O, and network throughput, among other performance-related metrics, at the desired granularity.

Option A: Sending CloudWatch logs to Redshift for analysis is unnecessary and overcomplicated for simple performance analysis, which can be done using CloudWatch metrics alone.

Option C: Fetching EC2 logs via Lambda adds complexity, and CloudWatch metrics already provide the required data for performance analysis.

Option D: Sending logs to S3 and using Redshift for analysis is also more complex than necessary for simple performance monitoring.

AWS References:

Monitoring Amazon EC2 with CloudWatch

Amazon CloudWatch Detailed Monitoring

Amazon FSx for Lustre is the ideal solution for high-performance computing (HPC) workloads that require parallel access to a shared file system with low latency. FSx for Lustre is designed specifically to meet the needs of such workloads, offering sub-millisecond latencies, which makes it well-suited for the 1 ms latency requirement mentioned in the question.

Here is why FSx for Lustre is the best fit:

Parallel File System: FSx for Lustre is a parallel file system that can scale across hundreds of Amazon EC2 instances, providing high throughput and low-latency access to data. It is optimized for processing large datasets in parallel, which is essential for HPC workloads.

Low Latency: FSx for Lustre is capable of providing access latencies well within 1 ms, making it ideal for performance-sensitive workloads like HPC.

Seamless Integration with Amazon S3: FSx for Lustre can be linked to an Amazon S3 bucket. This integration allows data to be imported from S3 into FSx for Lustre before the workload begins and exported back to S3 after processing. This feature is crucial for manual postprocessing because it enables engineers to access the dataset in S3 after processing.

Performance: FSx for Lustre is built for workloads that require high performance, such as machine learning, analytics, media processing, and financial simulations, which are typical for HPC environments.

In contrast:

Amazon EFS (Option A): While EFS provides shared file storage and scales across multiple EC2 instances, it does not offer the same level of performance or sub-millisecond latencies as FSx for Lustre. EFS is more suited for general-purpose workloads, not high-performance computing.

Mounting S3 as a file system (Option B and D): S3 is object storage, not a file system designed for low-latency access and parallel processing. Mounting S3 buckets directly or using AWS Resource Access Manager to share the bucket would not meet the low-latency (1 ms) or performance requirements needed for HPC workloads.

Therefore, Amazon FSx for Lustre (Option C) is the most appropriate and verified solution for this scenario.

AWS References:

Amazon FSx for Lustre

Best Practices for High Performance Computing (HPC)

Amazon FSx and Amazon S3 Integration