FINRA SIE - Securities Industry Essentials Exam (SIE)

Money market mutual funds invest in highly liquid, short-term debt instruments, such as Treasury bills, commercial paper, and certificates of deposit. While the funds aim to maintain a stable $1 NAV, this is not guaranteed.

C is correct because the fund’s investments are short term.

A is incorrect because the rate of return is not fixed; it varies with market interest rates.

B is incorrect because while the fund tries to maintain a $1 NAV, it is not guaranteed.

D is incorrect because yields do not always exceed those of savings accounts.

A temporary hold placed due to suspected financial exploitation of a specified adult generally expires no later than 15 business days after the hold is first placed, unless an authorized extension applies. Choice D is correct. The customer is 67 years old, which falls within the specified adult category for senior financial exploitation protections. These rules allow a broker-dealer to delay a disbursement of funds or securities when the firm reasonably believes financial exploitation may be occurring. The hold is designed to protect vulnerable customers while the firm conducts a review, not to permanently block customer access. Choice A is incorrect because two business days is not the maximum hold period. Choice B and choice C are also incorrect because they understate the standard initial period. The SIE outline includes financial exploitation of seniors under prohibited activities and identifies FINRA Rule 2165, Financial Exploitation of Specified Adults. The regulatory focus is investor protection: firms may temporarily hold suspicious disbursements when exploitation is suspected, while following notice, review, and supervisory requirements. Reference: Section 3.3.3 Other Prohibited Activities; FINRA Rule 2165 Financial Exploitation of Specified Adults.

Step by Step Explanation:

Cost Basis in Reverse Split: The total cost basis remains unchanged in a reverse stock split. Only the number of shares and price per share adjust.

Pre-Split: 1,000 shares at $5 each = $5,000.

Post-Split: 200 shares at $25 each = $5,000.

Incorrect Options:

A, B, and D: Do not reflect the unchanged total cost basis.

IRS Guidance on Stock Splits: IRS Stock Split Info.

FINRA Rule 2360 requires that customers receive the Options Disclosure Document (ODD), published by the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), before they are approved to trade options. The ODD explains the risks and characteristics of options trading.

D is correct because the ODD is mandatory for options account approval.

A is incorrect because a prospectus is not specific to options trading.

B is incorrect because the MSRB Investor Brochure applies to municipal securities.

C is incorrect because a margin disclosure statement is required only for margin accounts.

A stock’s price is generally adjusted downward by the amount of the declared cash dividend on the ex-dividend date, so B is correct. The ex-dividend date is the first day the stock trades without the right to receive the upcoming dividend. Investors who purchase on or after the ex-dividend date are not entitled to that declared dividend; the seller retains the right to receive it. Because new buyers are no longer receiving that cash distribution, the market typically reflects this by reducing the stock’s price by approximately the dividend amount (all else equal). This is a standard SIE-tested dividend timing concept.

The record date (choice C) is the date on which the company reviews its shareholder records to determine who is entitled to receive the dividend. It is a corporate bookkeeping cutoff and is not the date the market typically adjusts the price. The payment date (choice D) is when the company actually pays the dividend to shareholders of record; again, this is not when the stock generally drops by the dividend amount. Choice A is incorrect because “redemption date” applies to instruments like bonds, CDs, or redeemable fund shares—not common stock dividends.

This topic sits under corporate actions and dividend mechanics, and the SIE expects you to connect the sequence: declaration date (announced), ex-dividend date (price adjustment / eligibility cutoff for buyers), record date (company records), and payable/payment date (cash distributed). Understanding the ex-dividend date is crucial for customer communication, trade timing, and explaining why price may appear to “drop” even without negative news.

In a UTMA account, the minor is the legal owner of the account. The custodian (in this case, the attorney) manages the account until the minor reaches the age of majority specified by state law.

C is correct because the grandson (the minor) is the account’s legal owner.

A is incorrect because the attorney is the custodian, not the owner.

B is incorrect because the grandfather established the account but does not own it.

D is incorrect because the parent does not have ownership unless explicitly named as the custodian.

A corporate bond purchased at par value costs $1,000. If the bond is convertible into 40 shares of the issuer’s common stock, the investor’s per-share cost basis is calculated by dividing the bond’s cost by the number of shares received upon conversion. $1,000 divided by 40 shares equals $25 per share. Choice A is correct. Choice B incorrectly uses the number of shares as the dollar answer. Choice C and choice D are mathematical distractors that do not reflect the conversion calculation. Convertible bonds allow bondholders to exchange the bond for a specified number of common shares, giving the investor fixed-income characteristics plus potential equity upside. The conversion ratio is the number of shares received for each bond. The conversion price is effectively the bond’s par value divided by the conversion ratio. The SIE outline includes corporate bonds, convertible features, par value, and equity securities. This question tests the relationship between par value and conversion ratio. Reference: Understanding Products and Their Risks; Debt Instruments; Corporate Bonds; Convertible Features.

This fact pattern describes a classic conflict-and-manipulation style scenario: the RR buys first, promotes purchases to customers in a thinly traded security, benefits from the price increase that customer buying helps create, then sells for a profit and tells customers to sell afterward. In FINRA terms, this is consistent with a deceptive practice that violates standards of commercial honor and fair dealing (e.g., conduct rules requiring ethical behavior and prohibiting manipulative or deceptive devices). Thinly traded securities are especially vulnerable because relatively small buying pressure can move the price materially; when an RR uses their position and influence over customers to create demand that benefits the RR’s own account, regulators view that as improper and potentially manipulative.

Choice B is wrong because “customers also made money” does not cure a deceptive or manipulative practice. The issue is the RR’s conduct, conflicts, and potential misuse of customer recommendations to profit personally. Choice C is wrong because suitability and ethical standards apply regardless of a customer’s wealth level; high net worth does not make conflicted or deceptive conduct permissible. Choice D is wrong because there is no rule that representatives may only accept unsolicited orders for thinly traded securities. Firms may accept solicited orders if recommendations are suitable and communications are fair and balanced, but the scenario here is about deceptive/conflicted trading behavior.

On the SIE, this falls under prohibited practices and market manipulation concepts, including ethics, conflicts of interest, and improper trading ahead of customers.

A bank qualifies as an institutional account regardless of its total asset size. Institutional account treatment applies to certain regulated financial entities by status, including banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, registered investment companies, registered investment advisers, and other entities or persons that meet specified high-asset thresholds. Therefore, choice D is correct. The limited liability company with $10 million in assets does not meet the general $50 million asset threshold for “other” institutional accounts. A family office with $25 million also does not meet that threshold based on the facts provided. An individual with $45 million is below the same $50 million threshold and therefore is not the best answer. The SIE outline includes market participant categories such as institutional and retail investors and customer account registrations such as corporate and institutional accounts. This question tests the regulatory classification of the customer rather than the investment product. The classification matters because institutional accounts may be treated differently for certain communications, suitability analysis, and account procedures. Reference: Section 1.1.4 Market Participants and Their Roles; Section 3.2.2 Customer Account Registrations.