FINRA SIE - Securities Industry Essentials Exam (SIE)

A bond’s current yield is calculated as annual interest (coupon payment) divided by the bond’s current market price. For a fixed-rate bond, the annual interest amount is based on the coupon rate times par value (typically $1,000 par). With a 7% coupon, annual interest is $70 per $1,000 of par value. Since the coupon payment is fixed, the current yield becomes higher when the purchase price is lower, because you are receiving the same $70 of annual interest while paying less for the bond.

In this question, the possible market prices are 92, 100, 102, and 107 (quoted as percentages of par). A price of 92 means the bond costs $920 per $1,000 par. The current yield at 92 is $70 ÷ $920, which is higher than $70 ÷ $1,000 (at par), higher than $70 ÷ $1,020, and higher than $70 ÷ $1,070. Therefore, the bond has the highest current yield at the lowest price, which is 92.

This question is testing a fundamental SIE relationship: for bonds, yield and price move inversely. While “current yield” is a simpler measure than yield to maturity (YTM) because it ignores time to maturity and any gain/loss if the bond is redeemed at par, it is still widely used as a quick comparison tool. The exam expects you to recognize that as price declines (discount), current yield rises; as price increases (premium), current yield falls—assuming the coupon rate is fixed. The SIE outline includes debt instrument basics such as coupon, par, yield, and price/yield relationships.

Open-end mutual funds are redeemable securities, meaning investors can sell their shares back to the fund at the NAV.

D is correct because mutual funds allow redemption at NAV.

A, B, and C are not redeemable securities.

An option is at the money (ATM) when the current value of the underlying (here, the index level) is equal to the option’s strike price. That definition matches the question exactly, making B correct. ATM status is one of the core “moneyness” classifications tested on the SIE along with in the money (ITM) and out of the money (OTM).

For a call option, the option is ITM when the underlying index level is above the strike price (because exercising would allow purchase at the strike below the market), and OTM when the index level is below the strike. For a put option, it’s the reverse: ITM when the underlying is below the strike, and OTM when the underlying is above the strike. When the index level equals the strike, neither a call nor a put has intrinsic value based on immediate exercise, so it is ATM.

Choice A and C are incorrect because “in” and “out of the money” require the underlying to be above or below the strike, not equal. Choice D is incorrect because an option trading at “intrinsic value only” implies it has no time value and is priced exactly at intrinsic value. But ATM options have zero intrinsic value by definition; their premium (if any) is typically all time value, reflecting volatility and time remaining until expiration.

This question reinforces the SIE’s options fundamentals: strike price, premium, intrinsic vs time value, and how moneyness is determined using the underlying level relative to the strike.

Certificates of Deposit (CDs) are time deposit accounts issued by banks, offering fixed interest rates for a specified term. CDs are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 per depositor, but the issuing entity is the bank itself.

B is correct because banks issue CDs.

A is incorrect because the FDIC insures CDs but does not issue them.

C is incorrect because broker-dealers may facilitate the purchase of CDs but do not issue them.

D is incorrect because the Federal Reserve does not issue CDs; it manages monetary policy.

Step by Step Explanation:

Margin Accounts: Allow investors to borrow funds to purchase securities, with the securities serving as collateral for the loan.

Cash Accounts: Require full payment for securities purchased.

IRAs: Do not permit borrowing due to their tax-advantaged status.

DVP/RVP: Settlement mechanisms, not account types for borrowing.

FINRA Rule 4210 (Margin Requirements): FINRA Rule 4210.

When a firm acts in a principal capacity, it trades securities for its own account, buying or selling directly to or from its inventory. The firm’s role differs from an agency capacity, where it acts as an intermediary.

A is correct because principal capacity involves selling directly from the firm's inventory.

B, C, and D are incorrect because these scenarios describe agency transactions, where the firm facilitates trades between two parties.

If the investor’s only goal is to minimize taxes from a sale, they generally want to realize the smallest taxable capital gain (or potentially realize a loss). Cost basis is central: capital gain = sale proceeds − cost basis. A higher cost basis means less gain (or a greater chance of a loss) for the same sale amount, leading to lower taxable impact. Therefore, redeeming $1,000 from Fund A (high cost basis) is the best strategy, making A correct.

Redeeming $1,000 of Fund B (low cost basis) would typically produce a larger capital gain because the investor paid less (basis is lower) relative to current value. That larger gain increases taxable income (assuming the shares are held in a taxable account and not offset by losses). Splitting the redemption between A and B (choice C) would likely create more gain than redeeming solely from the higher-basis fund, so it is not optimal for tax minimization if a single-fund redemption is possible.

Choice D is imprecise and potentially misleading. “Higher profit” informally means larger unrealized gain, which would generally produce more taxable gain, not less. The tax-minimizing approach focuses on tax lot selection and selling shares with the highest basis (or lowest gain) when the objective is to minimize taxes, subject to the investor’s holding period (long-term vs short-term rates) and specific cost basis method used.

This is a core SIE taxable-account concept: when choosing which holdings to sell, investors can manage taxes by selecting higher-basis positions (or specific lots) to reduce realized gains.

This arrangement is not permissible because it is a sales contest/incentive tied directly to the sale of a specific investment company’s products, and it is funded by the product sponsor (ABC). Even if described as “training and education,” the key facts make it a prohibited non-cash compensation practice: the reward is offered only to the top producers of ABC fund sales during the month, and the trip is to a beach resort—creating a strong incentive to recommend ABC funds to maximize eligibility for the reward. This type of incentive can improperly influence recommendations and creates a conflict of interest between the RR’s compensation motivations and the customer’s best interest. Therefore, B is the best answer.

Choice A is not the best reason. The issue is not merely that the incentive is offered by ABC instead of the BD; non-cash compensation rules restrict sales contests and special compensation arrangements regardless of who sponsors them when they are tied to the sale of specific securities. Choice C is incorrect because calling something “training and education” does not make it permissible when the eligibility is driven by production in that sponsor’s products. True training meetings may be permitted under tightly defined conditions, but they cannot be structured as a sales contest rewarding top sellers. Choice D is also incorrect because even strong supervision does not cure a prohibited compensation structure—supervision is required, but it does not override rules designed to prevent conflicted incentives.

The SIE tests recognition that product-specific sales contests and lavish non-cash incentives are problematic because they can lead to biased recommendations and undermine fair dealing and best interest obligations.

Step by Step Explanation:

FINRA Rule 3240: Permits borrowing or lending arrangements between RRs and customers under specific conditions, including familial relationships, provided the arrangement complies with the firm’s policies.

Incorrect Options:

A: FINRA approval is not required; firm approval is.

B: A written agreement alone is insufficient without firm approval.

C: Commercially reasonable terms are not the sole criterion for permissibility.

FINRA Rule 3240 (Borrowing from or Lending to Customers): FINRA Rule 3240.

Step by Step Explanation:

Consumer Discretionary Sector: Includes products and services that are not essential, such as luxury items, travel, and entertainment. Revenues increase as disposable income rises during economic expansion.

Consumer Staples and Utilities: These sectors are defensive and less impacted by economic cycles.

Healthcare: Also less correlated with economic cycles due to its essential nature.

SEC and FINRA Guidance on Sectors: Investopedia Sector Overview.