WGU Secure-Software-Design - WGU Secure Software Design (D487) Exam

The DKEAD category that has a risk rating based on the threat exploit’s potential level of harm is Damage potential. This category assesses the total damage or impact that a threat could cause if it is exploited by an attacker. The risk rating in this category is determined by evaluating the severity of the potential damage, which could range from information disclosure to complete system destruction or loss of system availability.

References:

DREAD Threat Modeling1

OWASP Risk Rating Methodology2

DREAD Threat Modeling: An Introduction to Qualitative Risk Analysis3

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) is a framework designed to help organizations assess and improve their software security posture. SAMM is structured around five primary business functions: Governance, Design, Implementation, Verification, and Operations.

In this scenario, the focus is on reviewing design artifacts to ensure compliance with organizational security standards. This activity aligns with the Verification business function within SAMM. The Verification function encompasses security practices related to assessing and validating the security of software artifacts throughout the development lifecycle. Key practices under this function include:

Design Review: Evaluating design documents and models to identify potential security issues and ensure that security requirements are adequately addressed.

Code Review: Analyzing source code to detect security vulnerabilities and ensure adherence to secure coding standards.

Security Testing: Conducting various testing methodologies, such as penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, to identify and remediate security weaknesses in the software.

By focusing on the Verification function, the organization aims to proactively identify and address security concerns during the design and development phases, thereby enhancing the overall security posture of their software products.

References:

OWASP SAMM - Verification

The secure coding practice being described is Access Control. This practice ensures that access to data and features within a system is restricted and controlled. The description given indicates that the product has mechanisms to prevent the display of personally identifiable information (PII), restrict the printing of private documents, and require elevated privileges to access archived documents. These are all measures to control who has access to what data and under what circumstances, which is the essence of access control.

References:

ISO/IEC 27018 Code of Practice for Protecting Personal Data in the Cloud1.

NIST SP 800-122, Guide to Protecting the Confidentiality of Personally Identifiable Information (PII)2.

ISO/IEC 29151:2017, Code of practice for personally identifiable information protection3.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The scenario described indicates that the system was subjected to inputs containing random data and some structured query language (SQL) statements, leading to an exponential increase in test data. This behavior is characteristic of fuzzing, a testing technique used to identify vulnerabilities by inputting a wide range of random or unexpected data into the system.

Fuzzing aims to discover coding errors and security loopholes by bombarding the application with malformed or unexpected inputs, observing how the system responds. The presence of random characters and SQL statements suggests that the fuzzing tool was testing for vulnerabilities such as SQL injection by injecting various payloads into the system.

This approach is part of the Verification business function in the OWASP SAMM, specifically within the Security Testing practice. Security testing involves evaluating the software to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited, and fuzzing is a common technique employed in this practice to ensure the robustness and security of the application.

References:

OWASP SAMM: Verification - Security Testing

A threat profile is a security assessment deliverable that identifies possible security vulnerabilities in a product. It involves a systematic examination of the product to uncover any weaknesses that could potentially be exploited by threats. The process typically includes identifying the assets that need protection, assessing the threats to those assets, and evaluating the vulnerabilities that could be exploited by those threats. This deliverable is crucial for understanding the security posture of a product and for prioritizing remediation efforts.

References: The importance of a threat profile in identifying security vulnerabilities is supported by various security resources. For instance, Future Processing’s blog on vulnerability assessments outlines the steps involved in identifying security vulnerabilities, which align with the creation of a threat profile1. Additionally, UpGuard’s article on conducting vulnerability assessments further emphasizes the role of identifying vulnerabilities as part of the security assessment process2.

The issue described involves a session management vulnerability where the user’s session remains active even after the browser window is closed, allowing another user on the same machine to access the application without logging in. To prevent this security risk, it’s essential to adjust the session management controls to include an automatic timeout feature. This means that after a period of inactivity, or when the browser window is closed, the session should automatically expire, requiring a new login to access the application. This adjustment ensures that even if a user forgets to log out, their session won’t remain active indefinitely, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

References:

Secure SDLC practices emphasize the importance of security at every stage of the software development life cycle, including the implementation of proper session management controls12.

Best practices for access control in security highlight the significance of managing session timeouts to prevent unauthorized access3.

Industry standards and guidelines often recommend session timeouts as a critical security control to protect against unauthorized access4.