Oracle 1z0-1124-25 - Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 2025 Networking Professional

Needs: Private, dedicated connection for large data transfers to Object Storage.

Option A: VPN with Service Gateway uses public internet, limiting bandwidth—incorrect.

Option B: Internet Gateway exposes traffic publicly—incorrect.

Option C: FastConnect Private Peering provides a dedicated link, and Service Gateway ensures private Object Storage access—correct.

Option D: DRG with Internet Gateway isn’t private—incorrect.

Conclusion: Option C best meets the need.

Oracle states:

"FastConnect Private Peering combined with a Service Gateway enables secure, high-bandwidth access to Object Storage from on-premises networks."This supports Option C. Reference:FastConnect and Service Gateway - Oracle Help Center(docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Tasks/fastconnect.htm#servicegateway).

Requirement:Restrict inter-subnet communication unless permitted.

Options Analysis:

A:Removing default route breaks all routing, overly restrictive; incorrect.

B:Separate VCNs are excessive, complex; less practical.

C:NSGs provide granular, explicit control; optimal approach.

D:External firewall adds complexity, not VCN-native; inefficient.

NSG Advantage:Instance-level rules enforce policy within VCN.

Conclusion:NSGs are the most appropriate solution.

NSGs enable precise security within a VCN. The Oracle Networking Professional study guide states, "Network Security Groups (NSGs) allow you to define strict ingress and egress rules for instances, ensuring inter-subnet communication is explicitly permitted as per security policies" (OCI Networking Documentation, Section: Network Security Groups). This is more efficient than VCN separation or external firewalls.

Objective: Allow VCN-A to access on-premises (192.168.1.0/24) via VPN, isolate VCN-B using DRG route tables effectively and securely.

Option A: Single route table for both VCNs with NSGs on VCN-B to block traffic. This works but relies on NSGs, which are secondary to routing. Routing-level isolation is more secure and efficient.

Option B: Single route table for VCN-A with the VPN route, default table (no VPN route) for VCN-B. This isolates VCN-B effectively at the routing level, but managing one table across all attachments can complicate scaling.

Option C: Two route tables, both with VPN routes, then blocking VCN-B with security lists. This is inefficient—routes are advertised unnecessarily, relying on security lists instead of routing isolation.

Option D: Two route tables—DRG-RT-A with VPN route for VCN-A, DRG-RT-B with no VPN route for VCN-B. This ensures VCN-B has no path to on-premises at the DRG level, providing the strongest isolation.

Conclusion: Option D is the most effective and secure, leveraging routing for isolation rather than secondary security controls.

Oracle documentation states:

"DRG route tables control traffic between VCN attachments and external connections (e.g., VPN). Associate a unique route table with each attachment to enforce specific routing policies."

"To isolate a VCN, ensure its DRG route table contains no routes to the destination."Option D aligns with this approach. Reference:Dynamic Routing Gateway Overview - Oracle Help Center(docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Tasks/managingDRGs.htm).

Requirements: Private, low-latency cross-region VCN connectivity.

Option A: RPCs with route table updates enable private, direct peering via DRG—correct.

Option B: IPSec VPN adds latency over internet—incorrect.

Option C: Service Gateways are for OCI services—incorrect.

Option D: NAT Gateways use public IPs, not private—incorrect.

Conclusion: Option A is necessary.

Oracle states:

"Use Remote Peering Connections (RPCs) with DRG to connect VCNs across regions privately. Update route tables for CIDR routing."This supports Option A. Reference:Remote VCN Peering - Oracle Help Center(docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Tasks/remoteVCNpeering.htm).

Objective: Identify the OCI component for dynamic routing in a hybrid setup.

Option A: Internet Gateway enables public internet access, not private hybrid routing—incorrect.

Option B: DRG is a virtual router that dynamically routes traffic between on-premises networks and VCNs via FastConnect or VPN, using protocols like BGP—correct.

Option C: Service Gateway provides private access to OCI services, not on-premises connectivity—incorrect.

Option D: LPG peers VCNs within the same region, not with on-premises—incorrect.

Conclusion: DRG is essential for hybrid dynamic routing.

Oracle documentation confirms:

"The Dynamic Routing Gateway (DRG) enables dynamic routing between your on-premises network and VCNs, supporting hybrid cloud connectivity via FastConnect or VPN."This validates Option B. Reference:Dynamic Routing Gateway Overview - Oracle Help Center(docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Tasks/managingDRGs.htm).

Requirements:End-to-end encryption, no public internet for Object Storage access.

Options Analysis:

Service Gateway:Private access to Object Storage.

NAT Gateway:Public internet access; unsuitable.

Private Endpoint:Alternative private access, but newer feature.

HTTPS:Ensures in-transit encryption.

Evaluate Options:

A:Encryption at rest doesn’t cover transit; incomplete.

B:NAT uses public internet; violates policy; incorrect.

C:Service Gateway with HTTPS ensures full encryption and privacy; correct.

D:Private Endpoint with HTTPS is valid but less common than Service Gateway; slightly less optimal historically.

Conclusion:Service Gateway with HTTPS is most secure and compliant.

Service Gateway is standard for private Object Storage access. The Oracle Networking Professional study guide states, "A Service Gateway with HTTPS API calls ensures end-to-end encrypted traffic to Object Storage without public internet traversal" (OCI Networking Documentation, Section: Service Gateway). This meets security mandates effectively.