Oracle 1z0-1127-25 - Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 2025 Generative AI Professional

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting encourages an LLM to emit intermediate reasoning steps before providing a final answer, improving performance on complex tasks by mimicking human reasoning. This matches the scenario, making Option D correct. Option A (In-context Learning) involves learning from examples in the prompt, not necessarily reasoning steps. Option B (Step-Back Prompting) involves reframing the problem, not emitting steps. Option C (Least-to-Most Prompting) breaks tasks into subtasks but doesn’t focus on intermediate reasoning explicitly. CoT is widely recognized for reasoning tasks.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely covers Chain-of-Thought under advanced prompting techniques.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Prompts in a chatbot system are inputs provided to the LLM to initiate and steer its responses, often including instructions, context, or examples. They shape the chatbot’s behavior without altering its core mechanics, making Option B correct. Option A is false, as knowledge is stored in the model’s parameters. Option C relates to the model’s architecture, not prompts. Option D pertains to memory systems, not prompts directly. Prompts are key for effective interaction.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely covers prompts under chatbot design or inference sections.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Vector databases store data as high-dimensional vectors, optimized for similarity searches (e.g., cosine distance), unlike relational databases’ tabular, row-column structure. This makes Option C correct. Option A and D describe relational databases. Option B is false—vector databases excel in high-dimensional spaces. Vector databases support semantic queries critical for LLMs.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely contrasts these under data storage options.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In systems like RAG, the Ranker evaluates and sorts the information retrieved by the Retriever (e.g., documents or snippets) based on relevance to the query, ensuring the most pertinent data is passed to the Generator. This makes Option C correct. Option A is the Generator’s role. Option B describes the Retriever. Option D is unrelated, as the Ranker doesn’t interact with users but processes retrieved data. The Ranker enhances output quality by prioritizing relevant content.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely details the Ranker under RAG pipeline components.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In NLP (e.g., transformers), encoders convert input text into a vector representation (encoding meaning), while decoders generate text from such vectors (e.g., in translation or generation). This makes Option C correct. Option A is false—decoders generate text. Option B reverses roles—encoders don’t predict next words, and decoders don’t encode. Option D oversimplifies—encoders handle text, not just numbers. This is the foundation of seq2seq models.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely explains encoder-decoder roles under model architecture.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

T-Few fine-tuning, a Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method, updates only a small fraction of an LLM’s weights, reducing computational cost and overfitting risk compared to Vanilla fine-tuning (all weights). This makes Option C correct. Option A describes Vanilla fine-tuning. Option B is false—T-Few updates weights, not architecture. Option D is incorrect—T-Few typically reduces training time. T-Few optimizes efficiency.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely highlights T-Few under fine-tuning options.