API API-571 - Corrosion and Materials Professional

API RP 571 – Hydrogen Stress Cracking – HF Acid Service:

“HF acid environments can cause hydrogen stress cracking (HSC) in carbon steel, particularly in areas with high hardness or residual stress.”

“This is distinct from general corrosion and requires specific inspection focus.”

So, option A is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Per API RP 571, sulfidation corrosion rates are significantly accelerated by the presence of hydrogen. Hydrogen promotes:

Breakdown of protective sulfide scales

Increased diffusion of sulfur into the metal

Higher metal loss rates

This phenomenon is often referred to as hydrogen-assisted sulfidation and is commonly observed in refinery process units.

Moisture is more closely associated with oxidation mechanisms rather than high-temperature sulfidation.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Sulfidation and High-Temperature Corrosion

API RP 571 emphasizes under Hydrogen Stress Cracking – Hydrofluoric Acid (HF):

“Cracking in carbon steel is influenced by high hardness and tensile stress in the presence of wet HF acid.”

“Controlling weld and heat-affected zone hardness to below 200 BHN is a key mitigation measure, as higher hardness significantly increases susceptibility.”

Steel hardness and strength are thus critical for cracking in HF environments, making option C correct.

Same as above. Sigma phase formation is a microstructural phenomenon and not typically detected by NDE methods like magnetic particle or surface hardness testing.

Therefore, metallographic testing remains the definitive detection method, confirming option D again as the correct answer.

API RP 571 discusses this under Wet H₂S Damage – Hydrogen Blistering, HIC, SOHIC:

“Hydrogen generation is reduced as pH increases. At pH 9 and above, the corrosion potential is less favorable for hydrogen charging and thus permeation into the steel is minimal.”

“Most wet H₂S cracking damage mechanisms are accelerated under acidic conditions (pH < 7).”

Hence, high pH (around 9) environments offer the most protection against hydrogen damage, making option D the correct choice.

API RP 571 under Cooling Water Corrosion and Scaling:

“Cooling water scaling tends to occur more rapidly as water temperature increases. To minimize scaling, inlet temperatures to exchangers should be kept below 140°F (60°C) where possible.”

“Above this temperature, calcium carbonate and other salts tend to precipitate more readily.”

Thus, option A is correct.

API RP 571 states in the section on Creep Damage:

“Creep damage in carbon steels generally becomes a concern above 700°F (371°C), especially for steels with higher tensile strength (greater than 60 ksi).”

“For prolonged exposure above this temperature, time-dependent deformation can lead to material degradation and cracking, especially at weldments and stress concentrations.”

Thus, the lowest threshold for creep in high-strength carbon steels is 700°F (371°C), making option B correct.

As per API RP 571 Section 5.3.2.2 (Sigma Phase Embrittlement):

“Sigma phase embrittlement occurs in austenitic stainless steels (like 300 series) and duplex stainless steels exposed to 1000°F to 1800°F (540°C to 980°C)... This embrittlement results in a significant loss of toughness and ductility.”

Sigma phase is not a concern in Monel (nickel-copper alloy) or 5Cr steels.

400 series are ferritic and not typically affected by sigma phase.

Hence, Option A (300 series stainless steel) is correct.

API RP 571 explains under Condensate Corrosion (COâ‚‚ Corrosion):

“In condensate systems, carbon dioxide dissolves in the water forming carbonic acid, which leads to localized corrosion, including grooving and under-deposit attack, especially at low points like the bottom of horizontal piping.”

“This is most commonly observed in steam condensate return lines, and the damage is localized due to stratification.”

This matches the scenario described, where internal grooving at the bottom of steam condensate piping is characteristic of COâ‚‚-induced corrosion. Hence, option A is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Per API RP 571, mechanical fatigue failures are identified by the presence of beach marks or clam shell patterns on the fracture surface.

These features:

Appear as concentric rings

Represent successive crack growth increments

Radiate outward from the crack initiation site

This “clam shell” or “beach mark” appearance is one of the most recognizable signatures of fatigue failure.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Mechanical Fatigue

======================