APMG-International AgilePM-Foundation - Agile Project Management (AgilePM v3) Foundation Exam v3 update

 The Delivery Plan defined by DSDM has a planning horizon that includes the end of the project7. This plan looks towards the future, often months or years ahead, to guide the incremental delivery of the project’s outcomes.

Dialogue: The ability to talk about anything while maintaining relationships and achieving a good outcome is a clear demonstration of effective dialogue. Dialogue is essential for fostering mutual understanding and collaboration, especially during change. AgilePM emphasizes open communication and rich interaction to address concerns and align stakeholders.

Other Options:

Inclusivity: Focuses on ensuring diverse perspectives are included but doesn’t inherently emphasize open conversations.

Connectivity: Refers to fostering connections among team members and stakeholders, which is a broader concept.

Transparency: While important, it primarily relates to openly sharing information rather than fostering dialogue.

Key AgilePM Concepts Referenced:

Engagement and Communication Principles: AgilePM Handbook, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.

The Post-Project phase in AgilePM is crucial for evaluating the project’s success in terms of the business benefits realized3. It is conducted after the project is completed and focuses on assessing whether the expected benefits outlined at the start of the project have been achieved

 Quality during Evolutionary Development is ensured by continuous verification2. This involves iterative development, where all development processes, including testing, are repeated to ensure the output is complete and able to generate useful feedback2.

The PAQ is a living risk and alignment aid used to expose approach-based risks—culture, leadership, governance expectations, stakeholder availability, decision latency, technical readiness—and to agree mitigations. AgilePM positions the PAQ for early use and for periodic re-use at key checkpoints. As the Foundations phase completes, the project has clarified goals, governance, roles, and planning baselines; revisiting the PAQ then helps validate that the agreed approach actually fits the now-explicit context and that residual risks have owners and responses. If Foundations is later revisited (for example, after significant change in scope, funding, or organization), the PAQ should be revisited as well to re-check assumptions and tune mitigations. Treating the PAQ as a one-off document would miss its purpose: to sustain a fit-for-purpose approach as conditions evolve. Therefore, both statements are true.