Microsoft GH-500 - GitHub Advanced Security Exam

When you identify that a code scanning alert is a false positive—such as when your code uses a custom sanitization method not recognized by the analysis—you should dismiss the alert with the reason "false positive." This action helps improve the accuracy of future analyses and maintains the relevance of your security alerts.​

As per GitHub's documentation:​

"If you dismiss a CodeQL alert as a false positive result, for example because the code uses a sanitization library that isn't supported, consider contributing to the CodeQL repository and improving the analysis."​

By dismissing the alert appropriately, you ensure that your codebase's security alerts remain actionable and relevant.

To proactively address secret scanning:

Webhooks can be configured to listen for secret scanning events. This allows automation, logging, or alerting in real-time when secrets are detected.

Documenting secure development practices (like using environment variables or secret managers) helps reduce the likelihood of developers committing secrets in the first place.

Dismissal based on age is not a best practice without triage. SCIM deals with user provisioning, not scanning alerts.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

When setting up CodeQL analysis for compiled languages, there are two primary methods to build your code:​

GitHub Docs

Autobuild: CodeQL attempts to automatically build your codebase using the most likely build method. This is suitable for standard build processes.​

GitHub Docs

Custom Build Steps: For complex or non-standard build processes, you can implement custom build steps by specifying explicit build commands in your workflow. This provides greater control over the build process.​

GitHub Docs

The init action initializes the CodeQL analysis but does not build the code. The jobs.analyze.runs-on specifies the operating system for the runner but is not directly related to building the code. Uploading compiled binaries is not a method supported by CodeQL for analysis.​

When integrating CodeQL outside of GitHub Actions (e.g., in Jenkins, CircleCI):

Install the CLI: Needed to run CodeQL commands.

Analyze code: Perform the CodeQL analysis on your project with the CLI.

Upload scan results: Export the results in SARIF format and use GitHub’s API to upload them to your repo’s security tab.

You don’t need to write custom queries unless extending functionality. “Processing alerts” happens after GitHub receives the results.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Before defining a custom pattern for secret scanning in a repository, you must enable secret scanning for that repository. Secret scanning must be active to utilize custom patterns, which allow you to define specific formats (using regular expressions) for secrets unique to your organization.​

Once secret scanning is enabled, you can add custom patterns to detect and prevent the exposure of sensitive information tailored to your needs.​

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Dependency review is triggered by specific events in GitHub workflows:​

pull_request: When a pull request is opened, synchronized, or reopened, GitHub can analyze the changes in dependencies and provide a dependency review.​

workflow_dispatch: This manual trigger allows users to initiate workflows, including those that perform dependency reviews.​

The trigger and commit options are not recognized GitHub Actions events and would not initiate a dependency review.​

You can customize CodeQL scanning by including additional query packs or by specifying individual queries:

Packs: These are reusable collections of CodeQL queries bundled into a single package.

Queries: You can point to specific files or directories containing .ql queries to include in the analysis.

github/codeql refers to a pack by name but is not a method or field. Scope is not a valid field used for configuration in this context.

GitHub automatically closes a code scanning alert when the vulnerable code is fixed in the same branch where the alert was generated, usually via a commit inside a pull request. Simply clicking or triaging an alert does not resolve it. The alert is re-evaluated after each push to the branch, and if the issue no longer exists, it is marked as resolved.

The security-extended query suite includes additional CodeQL queries that detect lower severity issues than those in the default security-and-quality suite.

It’s often used when projects want broader visibility into code hygiene and potential weak spots beyond critical vulnerabilities.

The other options listed are paths to language packs, not query suites themselves.