IIA IIA-CIA-Part1 - Internal Audit Fundamentals

For consulting engagements, the criteria used to evaluate governance, risk management, and controls are determined jointly by internal auditors and the management. This is distinct from assurance engagements, where criteria are set independently by the auditor to assess whether an organization’s components are functioning as intended and to evaluate compliance with policies and procedures. This distinction emphasizes the collaborative nature of consulting engagements in contrast to the independent nature of assurance engagements.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

The best example of a risk appetite statement concerning an investment portfolio is one that explicitly states a tolerance level for investment earnings volatility, such as "We have a moderate tolerance for investment earnings volatility with a target value at risk of $50 million." This statement directly addresses the organization’s willingness to accept risk and quantifies it, which is characteristic of effective risk appetite statements.

IIA best practices on defining risk appetite, which recommend quantifying risk tolerance in financial terms to guide strategic decision-making.

===============

Management's decision to set a specific price below which liquid fuel shall not be sold, but instead stored, represents Risk avoidance. This approach involves eliminating the risk entirely by avoiding the activity that generates the risk. In this scenario, by deciding not to sell fuel below a certain price, management avoids the risk of losses due to price fluctuations.

ISO 31000: Risk Management Guidelines.

COSO ERM Framework.

If a new internal auditor suspects fraud, the appropriate action is to document supporting information and recommend an investigation to the appropriate audit management, such as the chief audit executive (CAE). This approach maintains the auditor's objectivity and ensures that suspicions of fraud are handled by following the proper channels and procedures established within the organization for such matters.

IIA guidance on fraud and the auditor's role in fraud detection, which emphasizes the importance of documenting evidence and escalating fraud concerns through proper management channels.

According to IIA guidance, an appropriate role for the internal audit activity includes coaching management in responding to risks. This involves providing advice, facilitating workshops, and sharing best practices to help management identify, assess, and mitigate risks effectively. Internal auditors can offer insights and recommendations based on their evaluations but should not take on management responsibilities.

Implementing risk responses on management's behalf (B), imposing risk management processes (C), and setting the risk appetite (D) are not appropriate roles for internal auditors, as these activities fall within the purview of management. The internal audit function should maintain its independence and objectivity while supporting and enhancing the organization's risk management efforts.

IIA Position Paper: The Role of Internal Auditing in Enterprise-Wide Risk Management

IIA Standard 2120: Risk Management

In the quality assurance and improvement program (QAIP) reporting, the inclusion of conformance of individual engagements with the Standards is essential. This aspect of the QAIP ensures that all audit activities adhere to the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, thereby maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the audit function. Reporting on conformance highlights the audit activity’s alignment with globally recognized standards and practices, which is a critical component of quality assurance in internal auditing.

IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing on Quality Assurance and Improvement Programs.

The chief audit executive should consider explaining the rating conclusions and the impact of the results from the external assessment when communicating the results of the quality assurance and improvement program to the board. This is crucial as it directly relates to the effectiveness and efficiency of the internal audit function, providing key insights into the internal audit's performance and its compliance with established standards and practices.

IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

A risk assessment process is a crucial precondition for developing an effective system of internal controls. It helps identify and analyze risks relevant to achieving the organization’s objectives, thereby informing the design and implementation of appropriate controls to mitigate those risks. This foundational step ensures that the internal controls are aligned with the specific risk landscape of the organization.

COSO Framework on Internal Control, Principle Related to Risk Assessment

Setting unrealistic targets for staff to achieve is a potential red flag indicating that there may be fraudulent activities occurring within the organization. When senior management sets targets that are unattainable, it can create pressure on employees to engage in unethical or fraudulent behavior to meet these goals. This is one of the elements of the fraud triangle (pressure, opportunity, and rationalization) that can lead to fraudulent activities.

IIA Practice Guide: Fraud and Internal Audit

COSO Fraud Risk Management Guide

The indication that an internal auditor was assigned to an assurance engagement is most strongly given by the requirement that the auditor must not assume management responsibilities while performing the engagement. This aligns with the principles of objectivity and independence, which are critical in assurance engagements to provide unbiased and reliable conclusions. Taking on management responsibilities could compromise the auditor's objectivity by involving them in the operations they are auditing.

IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.