PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor - QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

B. Applicable procedure: SP-701

D. Identification number of the washing machine

H. The concentration of the cleaning liquid used vs the concentration fixed in SP-701

I. The planned duration of the process vs the minimum time required in SP-701

J. Weight of linen being washed vs the maximum weight required in SP-701

C. Competence record of the machine operator

In a third-party certification audit, auditors are responsible for maintaining confidentiality as part of their professional duties. Here’s how they can demonstrate it:

A. Adhere to the CQI Professional Code of Conduct: The CQI (Chartered Quality Institute) Code of Conduct outlines ethical principles, including confidentiality. Auditors must adhere to professional standards, ensuring sensitive information is protected and not disclosed improperly.

B. Confirm the confidentiality arrangements with the auditee regarding the use of mobile devices/cameras: Before using mobile devices or cameras, auditors must seek explicit permission from the auditee and agree on confidentiality terms, preventing unauthorized recording or sharing of sensitive information.

Options C, D, and E involve breaching confidentiality and are not acceptable practices in an ISO 9001:2015 certification audit. Sharing sensitive information, removing evidence without consent, or discussing it with unauthorized parties violates audit principles and the standard's confidentiality requirements​.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 3.2, audit criteria are a set of policies, procedures or requirements used as a reference against which objective evidence is compared. Audit criteria are usually selected by the audit client or by agreement between the audit client and the auditee, and they should be appropriate for the audit scope and objectives1. Audit criteria may include, but are not limited to, the following sources2:

•ISO management system standards, such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, etc.

•Verbal statements by the general manager or other top management, as long as they are consistent with the documented policies and objectives of the organisation

•Verbal agreements with interested parties, such as customers, suppliers, regulators, etc., as long as they are documented and approved by the relevant authorities

•Health and safety notices, such as posters, signs, labels, etc., that communicate the organisation’s legal obligations, policies, or procedures

•Written agreements with interested parties, such as contracts, orders, specifications, etc., that define the requirements and expectations of the parties involved

•Organisation’s documented information, such as policies, procedures, manuals, records, etc., that describe the organisation’s management system and its processes

•Commitment to follow principles issued by an NGO, such as the United Nations Global Compact, the International Labour Organization, etc., as long as they are relevant to the organisation’s context and objectives

•Environmental aspects register, such as a list of the environmental impacts and risks associated with the organisation’s activities, products, and services

Therefore, the two options that are not potential audit criteria are F and H, as they are not reliable or verifiable sources of information, and they may not reflect the actual performance or conformity of the organisation’s management system. Commercial advertisements and claims made on the organisation’s website are forms of marketing communication that may be exaggerated, misleading, or inaccurate, and they are not subject to the same level of scrutiny or approval as the other sources of audit criteria.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3.3, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised as necessary to address changes that occur during the audit planning. The audit plan should be agreed upon, preferably in writing, by the audit team leader, the audit client and the auditee1. Therefore, if there is a significant change in the auditee’s situation, such as the cancellation of all orders for the next week, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised accordingly, with the agreement of all parties involved.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.1.4, the certification body should have a process to ensure that the audit team has the competence to achieve the audit objectives, and that the audit methods are appropriate for the scope and complexity of the audit. The certification body should also have a process to ensure that the audit is conducted under reasonable conditions and within a reasonable time frame2. Therefore, if there is a risk that the audit objectives cannot be achieved, or that the audit methods are not suitable, due to the change in the auditee’s situation, the certification body should be consulted and informed on how to proceed with the audit.

Therefore, the best action to take is B, ask the certification body you work for how to proceed with the audit. This action will ensure that the audit plan is revised and agreed upon by all parties, and that the audit team has the competence and the methods to conduct the audit effectively and efficiently. The other options are not correct, as they may compromise the quality and validity of the audit:

•A. Start the audit on Monday at ABC’s as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and plan visits to ABC customers wherever they may be working during the following week: This action may not be feasible or acceptable, as it may extend the audit duration and cost beyond the agreed terms, and it may not provide sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•C. Start the audit on Monday as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and visit another customer’s premises they cleaned the week before: This action may not be relevant or reliable, as it may not reflect the current performance and condition of the auditee’s processes. The audit evidence collected from the previous customer may not be valid or representative of the audit criteria, and it may not address the risks and opportunities associated with the auditee’s context and objectives. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•D. Complete the audit but ask the quality manager to clean some windows at the ABC’s office, simulating the process they carry out at customers’ premises: This action may not be objective or impartial, as it may introduce bias and influence in the audit process. The audit evidence collected from the simulated process may not be accurate or authentic, and it may not demonstrate the actual capability and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be ethical or professional, as it may compromise the integrity and credibility of the audit and the certification.