PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam

During an internal audit, it was found that a junior developer had unrestricted write access to the production source code repository and development tools, with no formal access controls in place. What type of security control should have been implemented to manage this risk?

What is the primary purpose of risk analysis?

Which of the following statements is accurate regarding the methodology for managing the implementation of an ISMS?

BioLooVitalis is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in Singapore Renowned for its pioneering work in the fie d of human therapeutics. BioLooVitalis places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology bone health, and inflammation BioLooVitalis has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 77001 for the past two years. After noticing an increase m failed login attempts over several weeks. bioLooVitalis IT security learn reviewed log data, correlated it with user behavior patterns, and mapped it against known attach vectors to determine potential causes. Based on their findings, they prepared a technical report detailing the nature of the anomalies and submitted it to the compliance function. The compliance team then summarized the findings and presented them to the executive management during the quarterly ISMS performance review. To proactively track system behavior following the spike n failed login attempts. BioLooVitalis's IT security team configured a dashboard showing real time login activity. system response times, and end point availability across departments. This helped the team quickly detect abnormal behavior without waiting formal reporting cycles. Following The implementation of the real time access control dashboard BioLooVitalis internal audit team assessed whether the new processes and tools effectively reduced unauthorized access attempts and met both technical and policy-based requirements. Lastly, the internal auditors collected system-generated access logs, reviewed user access reports, and conducted interviews with IT personnel. These data sources helped them verify whether the new controls were functioning as intended and aligned with internal ISMS objectives. Based on The scenario above, answer the following question.

According to scenario 8 what did the internal auditors collect during the evaluation of the new access control measures?

Scenario 5: Operaze is a small software development company that develops applications for various companies around the world. Recently, the company conducted a risk assessment to assess the information security risks that could arise from operating in a digital landscape. Using different testing methods, including penetration Resting and code review, the company identified some issues in its ICT systems, including improper user permissions, misconfigured security settings, and insecure network configurations. To resolve these issues and enhance information security, Operaze decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001.

Considering that Operaze is a small company, the entire IT team was involved in the ISMS implementation project. Initially, the company analyzed the business requirements and the internal and external environment, identified its key processes and activities, and identified and analyzed the interested parties In addition, the top management of Operaze decided to Include most of the company's departments within the ISMS scope. The defined scope included the organizational and physical boundaries. The IT team drafted an information security policy and communicated it to all relevant interested parties In addition, other specific policies were developed to elaborate on security issues and the roles and responsibilities were assigned to all interested parties.

Following that, the HR manager claimed that the paperwork created by ISMS does not justify its value and the implementation of the ISMS should be canceled However, the top management determined that this claim was invalid and organized an awareness session to explain the benefits of the ISMS to all interested parties.

Operaze decided to migrate Its physical servers to their virtual servers on third-party infrastructure. The new cloud computing solution brought additional changes to the company Operaze's top management, on the other hand, aimed to not only implement an effective ISMS but also ensure the smooth running of the ISMS operations. In this situation, Operaze's top management concluded that the services of external experts were required to implement their information security strategies. The IT team, on the other hand, decided to initiate a change in the ISMS scope and implemented the required modifications to the processes of the company.

Based on scenario 5. after migrating to cloud. Operaze's IT team changed the ISMS scope and implemented all the required modifications Is this acceptable?

Question:

Who is responsible for ensuring that the ISMS achieves its intended outcomes?

Scenario 1: NobleFind is an online retailer specializing in high-end, custom-design furniture. The company offers a wide range of handcrafted pieces tailored to meet the needs of residential and commercial clients. NobleFind also provides expert design consultation services. Despite NobleFind's efforts to keep its online shop platform secure, the company faced persistent issues, including a recent data breach. These ongoing challenges disrupted normal operations and underscored the need for enhanced security measures. The designated IT team quickly responded to resolve the problem. To address these issues, NobleFind decided to implement an Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 to improve security, protect customer data, and ensure the stability of its services.

In addition to its commitment to information security, NobleFind focuses on maintaining the accuracy and completeness of its product data. This is ensured by carefully managing version control, checking information regularly, enforcing strict access policies, and implementing backup procedures. Moreover, product details and customer designs are accessible only to authorized individuals, with security measures such as multi-factor authentication and data access policies.

NobleFind has implemented an incident investigation process within its ISMS, as part of its comprehensive approach to information security. Additionally, it has established record retention policies to ensure that online information about each product and client information remains readily accessible and usable on demand for authorized entities. NobleFind established an information security policy offering clear guidelines for safeguarding historical data. It also insisted that personnel sign confidentiality agreements and were committed to recruiting only qualified individuals. Additionally, NobleFind implemented measures for monitoring the resources used by its systems, reviewing user access rights, and conducting a thorough analysis of audit logs to swiftly identify and address any security anomalies.

With its ISMS in place, NobleFind maintains and safeguards documented information, encompassing a wide range of data, records, and specifications. This documented information is vital to its operations, ensuring the security and integrity of customer data, historical records, and financial information.

According to scenario 1, which detective control did NobleFind implement?

Why is the power/interest matrix used for?

Scenario 10: ProEBank

ProEBank is an Austrian financial institution known for its comprehensive range of banking services. Headquartered in Vienna, it leaverages the city's advanced technological and financial ecosystem To enhance its security posture, ProEBank has implementied an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001. After a year of having the ISMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001.

To prepare for the audit, the company first informed its employees for the audit and organized training sessions to prepare them. It also prepared documented information in advance, so that the documents would be ready when external auditors asked to review them Additionally, it determined which of its employees have the knowledge to help the external auditors understand and evaluate the processes.

During the planning phase for the audit, ProEBank reviewed the list of assigned auditors provided by the certification body. Upon reviewing the list, ProEBank identified a potential conflict of interest with one of the auditors, who had previously worked for ProEBank's mein competitor in the banking industry To ensure the integrity of the audit process. ProEBank refused to undergo the audit until a completely new audit team was assigned. In response, the certification body acknowledged the conflict of interest and made the necessary adjustments to ensure the impartiality of the audit team

After the resolution of this issue, the audit team assessed whether the ISMS met both the standard's requirements and the company's objectives. During this process, the audit team focused on reviewing documented information.

Three weeks later, the team conducted an on-site visit to the auditee’s location where they aimed to evaluate whether the ISMS conformed to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. was effectively implemented, and enabled the auditee to reach its information security objectives. After the on-site visit the team prepared the audit conclusions and notified the auditee that some minor nonconformities had been detected The audit team leader then issued a recommendation for certification.

After receiving the recommendation from the audit team leader, the certification body established a committee to make the decision for certification. The committee included one member from the audit team and two other experts working for the certification body.

After the Stage 2 audit, minor nonconformities were found. Despite this, the audit team leader issued a positive recommendation for certification.

Question:

Is this acceptable?

Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly

Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.

Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management

Based on scenario 8. does SunDee comply with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements regarding the monitoring and measurement process?