ITIL ITIL-4-Foundation - ITIL 4 Foundation Exam

The change enablement practice maximizes the number of successful service and product changes by ensuring that risks have been properly assessed, authorized, and managed within a schedule1. Change authorization is the activity of verifying that a proposed change is desirable, viable, and achievable before committing to its implementation2. The change type (standard, normal, or emergency) and model (a predefined approach for handling a specific type of change) is the basis for assigning the change authority (the role that can authorize a change)2. The other statements are incorrect because:

A standard change is a low-risk, pre-authorized change that follows an agreed procedure and does not require authorization at the point of implementation2.

An emergency change is a high-priority change that must be implemented as soon as possible to resolve an incident or implement a security patch2. An emergency change must be authorized by an emergency change authority (ECA), which is usually a subset of the normal change authority (CAB)2.

Ensuring that changes are authorized before their deployment is done by the change enabler (the role that coordinates all aspects of a change)2. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 16; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 39; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Change Enablement, page 7.

In ITIL 4, service relationships involve shared risks between service provider and service consumer. Both parties contribute to risk management.

Service consumers help mitigate risk by:

Clearly understanding and communicating their requirements

Being explicit about constraints, acceptable levels of performance, and critical outcomes

Ensuring that the provider knows what is truly needed, so services can be designed and delivered appropriately

Option C: “By being fully aware of their own requirements for the service” aligns with this: when consumers understand and clearly state their requirements, ambiguity and misalignment are reduced, which directly reduces risk in the service relationship.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Through the provision of services according to predefined needsProvision of services is the role of the service provider, not the consumer.

B. By ensuring that the service provider has configured correctly its resourcesResource configuration is the provider’s responsibility. The consumer may give feedback, but they don’t “ensure” correct configuration.

D. By controlling the specific level of risk on the service provider’s behalfThe provider manages its own risks. Risks are shared, but the consumer does not control the provider’s internal risk levels. The consumer contributes by clarifying requirements and using services as agreed.

References (Aligned with ITIL 4 Foundation concepts)

ITIL 4 Foundation: Service relationships – shared responsibility and shared risks between provider and consumer

ITIL 4 Foundation: Importance of clear requirements and expectations in reducing risks and enabling value co-creation

The ITIL SVS describes how all the components and activities of the organization work together as a system to enable value creation.

The SVS is made up of specific inputs, elements, and outputs relevant to service management. The key inputs to the SVS are opportunity and demand. The output of the SVS is value delivered by products and services.

Opportunity refers to options or possibilities to add value for stakeholders or otherwise improve the organization.

Demand refers to need or desire for products and services among internal and external consumers.

https://www.bmc.com/blogs/itil-service-value-system/

The second step is to conduct an objective current-state assessment of existing services and service management practices. This should include consideration of the users’ perception of the value being received, along with a review of people’s competencies and skills, the processes and procedures involved, the capabilities of the available technological solutions and the prevailing organizational culture. The success of an improvement initiative depends on a clear and accurate understanding of the starting point and the required impact of the initiative.

For example, an organization can measure the current net promoter score (NPS) from a customer satisfaction survey, conduct a benchmark survey against its competitors or review findings of operational statistics or audit reports to understand its current state. If this step is skipped, the current state will not be understood and there will not be an objective baseline measurement against which improvement can be measured.

https://www.bmc.com/blogs/itil-continual-improvement/

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In ITIL 4, the monitoring and event management practice is concerned with the systematic observation of services and service components. Its purpose is described as:

Continuously monitoring services and infrastructure.

Identifying and capturing changes of state in these components.

Classifying certain changes of state as events, which are then recorded, reported, and, where necessary, acted upon.

This practice enables early detection of issues, supports automated responses where appropriate, and helps maintain the normal operation and performance of services.

Option C accurately reflects this purpose, so it is correct.

The other options describe the purposes of different ITIL practices:

A – This is the purpose of incident management (restoring normal service operation quickly to minimize impact).

B – This is the purpose of service request management (handling user-initiated service requests effectively).

D – This is the purpose of change enablement (ensuring successful changes through proper risk assessment and authorization).

Relevant ITIL 4 Foundation references:

Monitoring and event management practice: purpose and key activities.

Purpose statements for incident management, service request management, and change enablement practices (for comparison).