ITIL ITIL-4-Transition - ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Exam

Results-based measurement and reporting is a method of measuring and reporting the outcomes and value delivered by products and services, rather than the activities and outputs involved in their creation and delivery12. Results-based measurement and reporting focuses on the achievement of objectives and the satisfaction of stakeholders, rather than the consumption of resources and the completion of tasks12.

An example of results-based measurement and reporting is measuring and reporting the customer satisfaction with closed incidents. This is because customer satisfaction is an indicator of the value and quality of the incident management practice and the service provided to the customers. Customer satisfaction reflects the extent to which the customers’ expectations and needs have been met by the resolution of the incidents. Customer satisfaction can also influence the customer loyalty, retention, and advocacy for the service provider34.

The other options are not examples of results-based measurement and reporting, because they measure and report the inputs and outputs of the service delivery, rather than the outcomes and value. Measuring and reporting the number of hours worked by service desk employees, the number of supplier-related interruptions to a service, and the cost of providing a service to customers and users are all examples of activity-based or output-based measurement and reporting. These metrics do not indicate the effectiveness or efficiency of the service delivery, nor the satisfaction or value perceived by the customers and users12.

 The correct answer is A. Failing to explain service provider action that impact the customer. This is because a lack of transparency and communication can erode the trust and satisfaction of the customer, and lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. The service provider should always inform the customer of any changes, issues, or decisions that affect the customer’s services, expectations, or outcomes. The service provider should also seek feedback from the customer and address any concerns or complaints promptly and effectively.

B. Scheduling interactions between customer and service provider is not a threat, but a good practice to maintain the relationship. Regular interactions can help to align the goals, values, and needs of both parties, and foster collaboration and mutual understanding. The service provider should also use these interactions to demonstrate value and performance, and to identify opportunities for improvement or innovation.

C. Changes in service provider and customer staff is not a threat, but a challenge that can be overcome with proper knowledge management and relationship management. The service provider should ensure that the knowledge and experience of the staff are captured, shared, and transferred to the new staff, and that the new staff are trained and competent to deliver the services. The service provider should also introduce the new staff to the customer and establish rapport and trust.

D. Failing to deal with communication in a timely fashion is a threat, but not the most likely one. Delayed or ignored communication can frustrate the customer and damage the reputation of the service provider. The service provider should respond to the customer’s communication as soon as possible, and provide clear and accurate information. The service provider should also follow up on the communication and ensure that the customer’s needs are met. References:

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Sample Paper - English, page 8, question 1, answer A

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Candidate Syllabus - English, page 9, learning outcome 1.3

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Course Online - Simplilearn, section 3.2, lesson 3.2.2, topic “Relationship Management”

Comprehensive Explanation:

The purpose of Supplier Management includes:

Ensuring that the organization’s suppliers and their performance are adequately managed to support value creation through strong, collaborative relationships.

Thus, Option A is correct.

This is the best approach because it ensures that the policy is aligned with the needs and expectations of all the parties involved in incident management. It also fosters a culture of collaboration and trust among the teams, which can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of incident resolution. By involving all the teams in the policy development, the organization can also leverage the experience and knowledge of the staff, and identify any potential gaps or issues that may arise in the incident management process. This approach is consistent with the ITIL 4 guiding principles of collaborate and promote visibility, focus on value, and keep it simple and practical12. References:

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Sample Paper - English3, page 7, question 2, answer B

ITIL 4 Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition4, page 20, section 2.3, paragraph 2

ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Create, Deliver and Support5, page 10, section 1.1, paragraph 4

ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Direct, Plan and Improve, page 12, section 1.1, paragraph 3

According to ITIL 4, an effective control environment is one that ensures that the organization’s objectives are achieved in a reliable and compliant manner1. Effective controls are the mechanisms that prevent, detect, or correct errors, fraud, or non-compliance in the organization’s processes and activities2. Some of the characteristics of effective controls are that they are aligned with the organization’s goals, policies, and standards, they are proportionate to the level of risk, they are consistent and transparent, they are regularly monitored and reviewed, and they are responsive to changes and improvements3.

In the scenario given, the legacy financial system requires the user to manually enter the time and date of the transaction to meet regulatory requirements, but these fields are often blank. This indicates a lack of compliance and accuracy in the financial reporting process, which could expose the organization to legal, financial, or reputational risks. Therefore, some effective controls that could improve compliance are:

Modify the application to automatically add the current time and date when transaction is entered. This is a preventive control that reduces the risk of human error or omission by ensuring that the required information is always captured and recorded in the system. This control also enhances the efficiency and reliability of the process by eliminating the need for manual input.

Create a report showing non-compliant records and take action to correct. This is a detective and corrective control that identifies and resolves any instances of non-compliance or inaccuracy in the financial records. This control also provides feedback and evidence for the performance and effectiveness of the process and the controls.

The other options are not effective controls for improving compliance in this scenario because they do not directly address the root cause of the problem or provide a specific solution. Establishing a communication plan to remind users of the importance of time and date on transactions is a good practice, but it does not guarantee that the users will follow the instructions or comply with the requirements. Developing a goals cascade so all staff know their role in achieving company goals is a strategic activity, but it does not specify how the financial reporting process or the legacy system will be improved or controlled. Therefore, the best answer is D. 1 and 4. References:

1: ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Transition Module | Axelos

2: ITIL® 4 Managing Professional Transition Course Online - Simplilearn

3: ITIL 4 MP Transition: a transformed framework | Axelos

4: Internal Controls for Better Compliance | Reducing Risk

5: Internal Controls: The Definitive Guide for Risk and Compliance Professionals — RiskOptics

6: How to Establish an Effective Control Environment

 Swarming is an alternative to the tiered support structure that would help to improve the situation. Swarming is a workflow management method that features in ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support. It is designed for organizations that support complex systems or services. Swarming involves stakeholders working together to resolve the issue, rather than escalating it through different levels of support. Swarming can be used to identify the responsible group for the next action, or a swarm might be responsible for resolution. Swarming is a technique to more effectively resolve complicated and complex issues, which typically require more than one person or group to complete an activity effectively. Swarming can also help to disseminate knowledge and experience among the support staff, and reduce the queues and delays caused by the escalation process. The other options are not relevant to the situation. Data analytics is the process of analyzing data to generate insights and support decision making. Robotic process automation is the use of software robots to automate repetitive and rule-based tasks. Continuous integration is a software development practice that involves merging code changes frequently and testing them automatically. References:

ITIL 4 & swarming – finding the right people & process | Axelos1

Swarming vs Tiered Support Models Explained - BMC Software2

Comprehensive Explanation:

A known error is defined as:

A problem that has been analyzed, has a known root cause, and may or may not have a workaround.

It may still be unresolved.

Therefore, Option C is correct.