PMI PMI-PBA - PMI Professional in Business Analysis

The best action to take to ensure the design meets customer requirements is to create a system requirements verification matrix to trace the design to the technical requirements and include verification methods. A system requirements verification matrix is a document that maps the design elements to the system requirements, and specifies the methods and criteria for verifying that the design satisfies the requirements. Verification methods can include inspection, analysis, demonstration, or testing. A system requirements verification matrix can help the business analyst and the project team to ensure the quality and completeness of the design, and to avoid any errors, gaps, or inconsistencies. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

 Root cause analysis (RCA) is a technique that can be used to investigate the problem of increased call interval in a new call management system. Root cause analysis is a method of identifying and resolving the underlying causes of a problem or an issue, rather than treating the symptoms or the effects. Root cause analysis involves asking questions, collecting data, analyzing evidence, finding patterns, drawing conclusions, and recommending solutions. Root cause analysis can help to prevent recurrence of the problem, improve performance, reduce risks, and increase customer satisfaction. Interviews are a technique that can be used to elicit information from stakeholders, but they may not be sufficient to investigate the problem in depth and find its root causes. Observation is a technique that can be used to understand how stakeholders perform their work in their own environment, but it may not be able to explain why the problem occurs and what causes it. Process modeling is a technique that can be used to represent how activities are performed in a process, but it may not be able to identify and resolve the problem in the process. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

 One of the first steps of a project is to identify the stakeholders and their interests. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the project or its outcome. Identifying the stakeholders and their interests helps to understand their needs, expectations, roles, responsibilities, and communication preferences. It also helps to manage their involvement and engagement throughout the project life cycle, and to address any potential conflicts or issues that may arise. The other options are not the first steps of a project. Identifying the classes of users and their requirements is part of the requirements elicitation process, which occurs after the project initiation phase. Aligning the sponsor expectations along the project goals is part of the project charter development, which is also done after the project initiation phase. Evaluating the sources for requirements and prioritizing them is part of the requirements analysis process, which occurs after the requirements elicitation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 10; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50; 3.

 A change-driven approach is the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A change-driven approach is an adaptive and iterative approach that embraces changes and feedback throughout the project lifecycle. It allows the organization to explore different options and alternatives for the solution and deliver value incrementally and frequently. A change-driven approach is suitable for projects that have high uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A plan-driven approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A plan-driven approach is a predictive and sequential approach that follows a detailed plan and minimizes changes and deviations from the baseline. It requires the organization to have a clear and stable vision of the solution and deliver value at the end of the project. A plan-driven approach is suitable for projects that have low uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A waterfall approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A waterfall approach is a type of plan-driven approach that divides the project into distinct phases and completes each phase before moving to the next one. It does not allow for any changes or revisions once a phase is completed. A waterfall approach is suitable for projects that have very simple, well-defined, and fixed requirements and solutions. An analytical approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. An analytical approach is a technique or a method for solving problems or making decisions based on data, logic, and reasoning. It does not refer to a specific project management or business analysis approach. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 28-29; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 13.

 Agile is an approach to enable developers and product owners to be in constant communication so that changes or issues that occur during development are exposed and discussed as they develop. Agile emphasizes iterative and incremental delivery of value, collaboration, feedback, and adaptation. Agile methods include Scrum, Kanban, XP, and others. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 17.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, one of the best strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria is to clearly define the performance measures and targets for the solution, such as accuracy, reliability, availability, efficiency, etc. These measures and targets help to evaluate how well the solution meets the stakeholder needs and expectations, and how it contributes to the business value. In this case, since the operations manager is concerned about the accuracy of the new measurement system, a good strategy would be to clearly define the maximum acceptable error rate for the new system, which would indicate how accurate the system should be in order to be accepted by the stakeholder. Quantifying the risks associated with measurement errors, asking for a formal acceptance of requirements documents, or planning a training session for the new system are not effective strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria, as they do not specify how the performance of the solution will be measured or evaluated. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 316-317.

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

The business analyst would recommend formal signoff to the group if errors in the product could result in financial solvency. Formal signoff is a process that ensures that the stakeholders agree on and approve the requirements and deliverables of the project. Formal signoff can help to reduce ambiguity, confusion, or disputes among the stakeholders and increase their accountability and commitment to the project. Formal signoff is especially important when errors in the product could result in financial solvency, as it implies that there is a high level of risk, complexity, or regulation involved in the project and that any mistake or defect could have severe consequences for the organization or its customers. The industry being unregulated is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less need for compliance or verification of the product quality or performance. The project impact being contained within a small department of the company is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less stakeholder involvement or interest in the project outcome or value. The organization following an iterative project life cycle is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is more flexibility and adaptability in the project scope and deliverables and that feedback and validation are obtained frequently throughout the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

 A matrix is a tool that can be used to record, organize, and track the requirements throughout the lifecycle of the project. A matrix can help the business analyst to identify the sources, dependencies, relationships, and attributes of the requirements, as well as to monitor their status, changes, and traceability. A matrix can also facilitate the communication, verification, and validation of the requirements with the stakeholders, and ensure their alignment with the business needs and objectives. A matrix can be updated and reviewed regularly to reflect the current state of the requirements and the solution, and to obtain the approval and acceptance from the stakeholders. A common example of a matrix is the Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM), which is a tool that links the requirements to the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and test cases12. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 92.