Scrum PSPO-II - Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II (PSPO 2)

According to the Scrum Guide, the Developers are the people in the Scrum Team who are committed to creating any aspect of a usable Increment each Sprint. They are accountable for creating a plan for the Sprint, the Sprint Backlog, and for adhering to the Definition of Done. The Product Owner and the Scrum Master are not accountable for these activities, but they may support the Developers as needed. The Scrum Team as a whole is accountable for delivering a valuable, useful, and potentially releasable Increment each Sprint, but the Developers have the specific accountability for planning and buildingit. References := Scrum Guide, Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework, Managing Products with Agility

 A good Product Vision and Strategy should have the following attributes12:

It describes who will use the product and what they would like to achieve. This helps to define the target market, the customer segments, and the user personas, as well as their needs, goals, and problems.

It describes how people will use the product to achieve potential outcomes. This helps to articulate the value proposition, the benefits, and the features of the product, as well as the assumptions and hypotheses that need to be validated.

It describes what value means in the context of the product, and how it can be measured. This helps to establish the objectives, the key results, and the metrics that will guide the product development and evaluation.

It is not necessary for a good Product Vision and Strategy to describe how the product compares to competitor products. This may be part of the market analysis or the competitive advantage, but it is not a core attribute of the Product Vision and Strategy. Moreover, focusing too much on the competitors may distract from the customer needs and the product value. References: 1: Product Vision, 2: Product Strategy

A, B, C, and D are correct because they are all measures of the value that a product delivers to the customers and the organization1. Revenue per Employee indicates the efficiency and productivity of the product development2. Market Share shows the competitive advantage and customer satisfaction of the product3. The average selling price as compared to close competitors reflects the perceived value and quality of the product4. Product profitability measures the financial return and viability of the product5. E is incorrect because the weekly velocity of the Developers is not a measure of value, but a measure of output and capacity. Velocity does not indicate whether the product is meeting the needs and expectations of the customers and the stakeholders.

Product Backlog refinement is an ongoing activity that can occur at any time during a Sprint, as needed. The Product Owner and Developers collaborate on this task, ideally in advance of the upcoming Sprint to ensure clarity and readiness of the work ©. If refinement has not been done in preceding Sprints, it should be done in the current Sprint to maintain the flow of valuable work (E). This approach is consistent with the Scrum principle of continuous improvement and the iterative, incremental nature of Scrum12.

According to the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II guide, one of the keycompetencies of a Product Owner is to validate product assumptions and hypotheses using empirical evidence1. This means that instead of investing a lot of money and time into building a product based on unproven ideas, the Product Owner should conduct small experiments to test the viability, desirability, and feasibility of the product2. These experiments can take various forms, such as prototypes, mockups, surveys, interviews, landing pages, etc. The goal is to gather feedback from real or potential users and customers, and measure the outcomes against predefined success criteria3. Based on the results of the experiments, the Product Owner can then decide whether to persevere, pivot, or terminate the product idea4. This approach helps to reduce the risk of wasting resources on products that nobody wants or needs, and to focus on the most valuable and promising ideas.

According to the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II (PSPO II) guidelines, the best indicators of value delivery are those that reflect the product’s impact on customers and its usage in the market.

Customer satisfaction (Option A) is a direct measure of how well the product meets customer needs and expectations. High customer satisfaction is a strong indicator that the product is delivering value1.

Frequency of feature use (Option D) provides insights into which features are most valuable to users by showing how often they are used. This metric helps Product Owners understand user behavior and prioritize features that deliver the most value1.

On-time release trends (Option B) and velocity (Option C) are more about the process and efficiency of the development team rather than direct indicators of value to the customer. Scope implemented (Option E) measures the amount of work done but does not necessarily correlate with customer value. Therefore, options A and D are the best choices for measuring value delivery as per the PSPO II resources.

D is correct because the timebox for the Sprint Review is four hours or less for a one-month Sprint, and usually shorter for shorter Sprints1. The Sprint Review is an event where the Scrum Team and the stakeholders inspect the outcome of the Sprint and collaborate on what to do next1. A is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not an open-ended event, but a timeboxed one that respects the attendees’ time and ensures productivity2. B is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not a point in time, but a timeboxed event that has a specific purpose and agenda1. C is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not the same asthe Daily Scrum, which is a 15-minute event for the Developers to synchronize their work1.

The Professional Scrum Product Ownerâ„¢ II (PSPO II) emphasizes the importance of a strategic approach to product management. According to the PSPO II resources, it is essential to:

Continually measure the impact of new investments or marketing efforts for both products (Option A). This aligns with the PSPO II focus on evidence-based management and making decisions based on empirical data.

Invest in Product A to increase its market share, customer satisfaction, and revenue (Option B). The PSPO II materials suggest that a product with a greater potential market but lower customer satisfaction requires attention to improve its standing and capitalize on its market potential.

Investigate an increase in marketing for Product B to grow its market share (Option C). Even though Product B is currently generating more revenue, the PSPO II guides recommend exploring opportunities to expand its market share, which could lead to even greater revenue.

Therefore, a comprehensive investment strategy that includes all the above actions is recommended for managing products with agility, as per the PSPO II guidelines. This approach ensures that both products are given the opportunity to maximize their market potential while maintaining a focus on customer satisfaction and revenue growth. It’s a holistic strategy that considers the different strengths and opportunities of each product.

The primary accountability of a Product Owner within the Scrum framework is to maximize the value of the work that the Scrum Team delivers. This involves managing the Product Backlog, but the overarching responsibility is ensuring that the team’s efforts translate into value