CompTIA PT0-003 - CompTIA PenTest+ Exam

The correct answer is A. SQL injection

The request contains a login attempt with the password value:

admin ' or '

This is characteristic of a SQL injection test because the tester is inserting SQL syntax into an input field to manipulate the backend database query. The single quote attempts to break out of the expected string value, and the OR condition attempts to alter the logic of the authentication query.

For example, a vulnerable login query might be manipulated so that the condition always evaluates as true, allowing authentication bypass.

B is incorrect because session hijacking involves stealing or reusing a valid session token or cookie. Although a cookie is present in the request, the attack shown is focused on the login input, not on taking over an existing session.

C is incorrect because brute forcing involves repeatedly trying many username or password combinations. The question shows a crafted payload, not repeated credential guessing.

D is incorrect because cross-site scripting involves injecting JavaScript or HTML into a web page so it executes in a user’s browser. The payload shown is SQL-like syntax, not client-side script code.

In PenTest+ terms, this falls under Attacks and Exploits, specifically web application attacks and authentication bypass attempts using SQL injection.

Deauthentication is the correct answer because it is classically effective against WPA2 wireless networks, while WPA3 includes protections against unauthenticated deauthentication management-frame abuse when properly implemented with Protected Management Frames. Since AP3 is the only access point using WPA2, it is the only one that clearly remains the specific target for this attack in the scenario. A deauthentication attack forces connected clients off the network, often to capture handshakes or to push users toward reconnect behavior during wireless assessments. Brute force is not exclusive to AP3 in the way this question asks, signal jamming can affect any wireless network regardless of security standard, and evil twin attacks are not limited only to WPA2 networks. Therefore, the attack that applies only to AP3, based on its WPA2 configuration, is deauthentication.

To collect permission details for objects within an Active Directory domain, the PenTest+ workflow most closely aligns with using SharpHound (the BloodHound data collector) followed by BloodHound analysis. SharpHound is executed from a domain-joined or internally reachable system using a valid AD account to enumerate domain relationships, including group membership, sessions, local admin rights, and—most importantly for this question—object control and ACL-based permissions (for example, rights that allow modifying users, resetting passwords, adding group members, or controlling GPOs). BloodHound then imports this collected graph data and allows the tester to run Cypher queries to identify effective privileges, abuse paths, and misconfigurations that enable privilege escalation or lateral movement.

Rubeus is primarily focused on Kerberos ticket operations (TGT/TGS manipulation, roasting, delegation abuse) and is not a Cypher-query permission-mapping platform. CrackMapExec supports network/AD operations, but it is not the standard toolchain for graph-based permission path analysis described in PenTest+. Registry collection is unrelated to enumerating domain object permissions.

Part 1 - 192.168.2.2 -O -sV --top-ports=100 and SMB vulns

Part 2 - Weak SMB file permissions

https://subscription.packtpub.com/book/networking-and-servers/9781786467454/1/ch01lvl1sec13/fingerprinting-os-and-services-running-on-a-target-host

The correct answer is C. Prompt injection

Prompt injection occurs when an attacker crafts input that causes an AI system to ignore, bypass, or override its intended instructions, safety rules, or output restrictions. In this scenario, the chatbot accepts harmful or policy-violating variations, including malicious links, encoded data leakage, and abusive content. These are indicators that user-supplied prompts can manipulate the chatbot’s behavior.

A is incorrect because container escape involves breaking out of an isolated container environment to access the host or other containers. The question is about manipulating chatbot responses, not container isolation.

B is incorrect because output fuzzing is a testing technique that varies inputs to observe how outputs change. It may be used to discover the issue, but it is not the vulnerability being described.

D is incorrect because model manipulation generally refers to changing or poisoning the model itself, such as altering training data, weights, or behavior at the model level. The scenario describes malicious user inputs affecting responses, which is prompt injection.

In PenTest+ terms, this falls under Attacks and Exploits, specifically AI/LLM-related attacks, prompt injection, and testing for unsafe chatbot behavior.

The correct answer is B. Perform privilege escalation.

The command:

netsh advfirewall set domainprofile state off

attempts to disable the Windows Firewall for the domain profile. Changing firewall settings requires administrative privileges. If the tester has shell access but the command fails, the most likely reason is that the current shell does not have sufficient privileges.

The tester should attempt privilege escalation to gain the required administrative or SYSTEM-level permissions before modifying firewall settings.

A is incorrect because finding other attack paths may be useful later, but the immediate issue is insufficient privilege.

C is incorrect because validating the target system’s fingerprint does not resolve a permissions failure when running a privileged Windows command.

D is incorrect because gathering more network data does not correct the inability to modify local firewall configuration.

In PenTest+ terms, this falls under Attacks and Exploits, specifically post-exploitation actions, privilege escalation, and executing commands that require elevated permissions on a compromised host.

The command searches for the keyword " pass " (passwords) across all .txt, .cfg, and .xml files, which are common locations for stored credentials.

Option A (Configuration files) ❌: While .cfg files may contain settings, the search is specifically for secrets (passwords).

Option B (Permissions) ❌: The command does not list permissions.

Option C (Virtual hosts) ❌: This does not relate to virtual host enumeration.

Option D (Secrets) ✅: Correct. The tester is looking for stored passwords or sensitive data.

📖 Reference: CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-003 Official Guide – Privilege Escalation Techniques

The missing do keyword is the reason for the syntax error. Bash for loops must include a do statement before executing commands within the loop.

Corrected script:

#!/bin/bash

for i in {1..254}; do

ping -c1 192.168.1.$i

done

From the CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-003 Official Study Guide (Chapter 4 – Scanning and Enumeration):

“In Bash scripting, control structures like for-loops require correct syntax, including the ' do ' keyword for loop logic to execute properly.”

SQL injection (SQLi) is a technique that allows attackers to manipulate SQL queries to execute arbitrary commands on a database. It is one of the most common and effective methods for accessing sensitive data in internal applications that accept unexpected user inputs. Here’s why option B is the most likely technique:

Arbitrary Command Execution: The question specifies that the internal application accepts unexpected user inputs leading to arbitrary command execution. SQL injection fits this description as it exploits vulnerabilities in the application ' s input handling to execute unintended SQL commands on the database.

Data Access: SQL injection can be used to extract sensitive data from the database, modify or delete records, and perform administrative operations on the database server. This makes it a powerful technique for accessing sensitive information.

Common Vulnerability: SQL injection is a well-known and frequently exploited vulnerability in web applications, making it a likely technique that a penetration tester would use to exploit input handling issues in an internal application.

References from Pentest:

Luke HTB: This write-up demonstrates how SQL injection was used to exploit an internal application and access sensitive data. It highlights the process of identifying and leveraging SQL injection vulnerabilities to achieve data extraction​​.

Writeup HTB: Describes how SQL injection was utilized to gain access to user credentials and further exploit the application. This example aligns with the scenario of using SQL injection to execute arbitrary commands and access sensitive data​​.

Conclusion:

Given the nature of the vulnerability described (accepting unexpected user inputs leading to arbitrary command execution), SQL injection is the most appropriate and likely technique that the penetration tester would use to access sensitive data. This method directly targets the input handling mechanism to manipulate SQL queries, making it the best choice.

======

PsExec is a Windows Sysinternals tool that allows users to execute commands on a remote system without needing an interactive login session. The command above is executing cmd.exe on a remote Windows Active Directory domain machine (server01.cor.ptia.org).

Option A (Test connectivity using PsExec) ❌: The command does not check connectivity; it executes a command remotely.

Option B (Perform a lateral movement attack) ✅: Correct. Lateral movement occurs when an attacker moves from one compromised machine to another within a network, using valid credentials. PsExec is often used for this purpose.

Option C (Send the PsExec binary) ❌: The command runs cmd.exe remotely, but it does not transfer PsExec itself.

Option D (Enable cmd.exe) ❌: cmd.exe is already enabled by default on most Windows systems.

📖 Reference: CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-003 Official Guide – Lateral Movement with PsExec