Spring Sale Special Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: xmas50

PRINCE2 Prince2-Practitioner - PRINCE2 7 Practitioner (7th Edition) Exam

Page: 3 / 8
Total 263 questions

Which principle is supported by the activity Evaluate the Project?

A.

Continued Business Justification

B.

Defined roles and responsibilities

C.

Learn from experience

D.

Manage by stages

The Calendar project was delivered as originally planned, and Is now preparing for planned closure.

Lines 1 to 6 in the table below consist of an assertion statement and a reason statement. For each line identify the appropriate option, from options A to E, that applies. Each option can be used once, more than once or not at all.

When updating the project plan as part of Managing a stage boundary, what else might be updated?

A.

Exception Plan

B.

Project Management team

C.

Business Case

D.

Project Initiation Documentation

Which of the following statements is FALSE regarding the Continued Business Justification?

A.

The justification for the project must remain the same throughout the project.

B.

The justification for the project should remain vabd.

C.

The justification for the project may change.

D.

If the project is no longer justified it should be stopped.

The Manage by Exception principle sets tolerances for six areas of the project, Time. Cost and Quality are three of them, what are the other three?

A.

Scope, People & Resources, Benefit

B.

Scope, Risk, Product

C.

Risk, Benefit, Product

D.

Scope, Risk, Benefit

Which of the following activities could trigger the production of an exception plan?

A.

Review Stage status

B.

Giving ad hoc direction

C.

Escalating a project issue

D.

Report stage end

Which of the following management products ARE updated as part of Managing a stage boundary?

1. Business Case

2. Benefits Review Plan

3. Configuration Item Records

4. Project Brief

A.

1, 2, 3

B.

1, 3, 4

C.

1, 2, 4

D.

2, 3, 4

Which of the following activities is the Executive responsible for?

A.

Ensure the desired outcome of the project is specified

B.

Responsible for the benefits review plan

C.

Assess and update the Business Case at the end of each stage

D.

Responsible for the Benefits Review Plan post project

Scenario

A central government department, the Ministry of Food Hygiene (MFH), faces increasing pressure to cut costs, better manage suppliers’ performance and reduce the confusion caused by inadequate internal controls, outdated standards and outdated technology. External consultants were employed to conduct a feasibility study to identify options to address the problems, and the likely costs and benefits. The following options were considered:

● Do nothing.

● Re-engineer selected business functions.

● Outsource selected business functions.

The feasibility study concluded that there was a case for outsourcing the MFH Information Technology

Division and the Facilities Division (maintenance of buildings and grounds). The recommendations were:

● One service provider should be contracted to provide the services currently provided by the

Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division.

● A 10-year service contract should be agreed with the selected service provider.

The feasibility study developed high-level designs of the current organization, processes, systems and

operating models, plus an outline Business Case for the required project. The external consultants

also made the following recommendations for the management of the project:

● Use PRINCE2.

● Set up the project with 4 management stages:

Stage 1. Standard PRINCE2 initiation activities.

Stage 2. Create detailed designs (future organization, processes, systems and operating

models) and the service level agreement between MFH and the future service

provider.

Stage 3. Request and evaluate proposals, select service provider and agree contract.

Stage 4. Transfer equipment and staff, transfer responsibility for service provision and run

trial period.

Initial estimates indicated that the project would cost £2.5m and take two years to complete.

MFH senior management agreed that there was a case for outsourcing, and accepted the

recommendations as a basis for the project. There is an expected saving of £20m over 10 years.

The Outsourcing project has completed the Starting up a Project process and is now in the initiation stage. Because of the strategic importance of the project, the MFH Chief Executive Officer has taken the role of Executive. A PRINCE2-experienced Project Manager has been appointed from within MFH. Staff within the business functions being outsourced will work with the external consultants who conducted the feasibility study to define the detailed designs.

Which 2 statements should be recorded under the Reasons heading?

A.

The lack of up-to-date technology in MFH means a re-engineering of existing services will not necessarily deliver the performance improvements required.

B.

Providing re-engineered services in-house will remove the need to transfer staff to a service provider.

C.

The Ministry of Food Hygiene (MFH) needs to deal with the increasing pressure to cut costs and better manage supplier's performance.

D.

Relocating staff to the selected service provider's premises will mean that no property transfer is required.

E.

The inadequate controls, outdated standards and outdated technology must be addressed.

During stage 3, the project scope was extended to include a practice test for learners to take during the training course. The cost of this test will be included in the cost of the course.

The change to project scope was approved and the cost of £2,500 was paid for from the change budget. The project manager documented an increase of £2,500 in the project budget in the business case.

Is this an appropriate action, and why?

A.

Yes, because the justification for the project should be recalculated based on the revised project budget.

B.

Yes, because the project manager determines which costs need to be updated at the end of each stage

C.

No, because the use of the change budget means that the project budget does not need to be increased.

D.

No, because changes to operational costs post-project should have been included in the business case.