Qlik QSDA2024 - Qlik Sense Data Architect Certification Exam – 2024

In the script provided, the alt() function is used to handle various date formats. The alt() function in Qlik Sense evaluates a list of expressions and returns the first valid expression. If none of the expressions are valid, it returns the last argument provided (in this case, '31/12/2022').

Step-by-step breakdown:

The alt() function checks the Date field for three different formats:

YYYYMMDD

YYYY/MM/DD

DD/MM/YYYY

If none of these formats match the value in the Date field, the default date '31/12/2022' is assigned.

Values in the Date field:

20210131: Matches the first format YYYYMMDD.

2020/01/31: Matches the second format YYYY/MM/DD.

31/01/2019: Matches the third format DD/MM/YYYY.

9999: Does not match any of the formats, so the alt() function returns the default value '31/12/2022'.

In the scenario, two tables (OrderDetails and Customers) are being loaded into the Qlik Sense data model, and these tables are related via the fields CustomerID and CustomerKey. The goal is to ensure that the relationship between these two tables is correctly established in Qlik Sense without creating synthetic keys or data inconsistencies.

Option A:Renaming CustomerKey to CustomerID in the OrderDetails table ensures that the fields will have the same name across both tables, which is necessary to create the relationship. However, renaming is done using AS, which might create an issue if the fields in the original data source have a different meaning.

Option B and C:These options use AUTONUMBER to convert the CustomerKey and CustomerID to unique numeric values. However, using AUTONUMBER for both fields without ensuring they are aligned correctly might lead to incorrect associations since AUTONUMBER generates unique values based on the order of data loading, and these might not match across tables.

Option D:This approach loads the tables with their original field names and then uses the RENAME FIELD statement to align the field names (CustomerKey to CustomerID). This ensures that the key fields are correctly aligned across both tables, maintaining their relationship without introducing synthetic keys or mismatches.

In this scenario, users of a published app report incomplete visualizations, but the data architect is unable to replicate the error. This issue affects only one team, suggesting that the problem is related to how data is being restricted or filtered for that specific team.

Section Access: This is a security feature in Qlik Sense that controls user access to specific data within an app. If Section Access is misconfigured, it can restrict access to more records than intended, leading to incomplete visualizations for certain users or teams.

Restricting Too Many Records: If the Section Access is too restrictive, it might limit the data available to the affected users, causing the visualizations to display incomplete information. This could explain why the data architect, who likely has full access, cannot replicate the issue.

In the provided scenario, the data architect needs to create a data model that supports various analyses, including total sales for each customer, total sales by state, identifying customers with no sales, and displaying the names of salespersons and regional account managers.

Here’s whyOption Cis the correct choice:

Loading the Sales Table:The Sales table contains key information related to sales transactions, including SaleID, CustomerID, Amount, SaleDate, SalesPersonID, and RegionalAcctMgrID. This table must be loaded first as it will be central to the analysis.

Loading the Customers Table:The Customers table includes customer details such as CustID, CustName, Address, City, State, and Zip. Loading this table and linking it to the Sales table via the CustomerID field allows you to perform analyses such as total sales per customer and total sales by state. Importantly, loading the customers separately will also allow the identification of customers without any sales.

Loading the Employees Table Twice:The Employees table must be loaded twice because it is used to look up two different roles in the sales process: the SalesPersonID and the RegionalAcctMgrID. When loading the table twice:

The first instance of the Employees table will be used to map the SalesPersonID to EmployeeName.

The second instance will be used to map the RegionalAcctMgrID to EmployeeName.

Aliasing the EmployeeID field appropriately in each instance is crucial to prevent creating synthetic keys and to ensure the correct association with the roles in the sales process.

This approach ensures that the data model will correctly support all the required analyses, including identifying customers without sales, which is crucial for meeting the business requirements.

Option AandOption Bpropose using a mapping load and ApplyMap, which can complicate the model and does not directly address all the business requirements.

Option Dinvolves aliasing fields in a way that could create unnecessary complexity and might not accurately reflect the relationships in the data.

Thus,Option Cis the correct answer as it best meets the requirements while maintaining a clear and functional data model.

In the provided data model, there is an issue where certain types of analysis over time are not showing the expected data. This problem is often caused by a mismatch in the data formats of the OrderDate field between the Orders and MasterCalendar tables.

Option A:DatefFloor(OrderDate)) would round down to the nearest date boundary, which might not address the root cause if the issue is related to different date and time formats.

Option B:TimeStamp#(OrderDate, 'M/D/YYYY hh.mm.ff') ensures that the date is interpreted correctly as a timestamp, but this does not resolve potential mismatches in date format directly.

Option C:TimeStamp(OrderDate) will keep both date and time, which may still cause mismatches if the MasterCalendar is dealing purely with dates.

Option D:Date(OrderDate) formats the OrderDate to show only the date portion (removing the time part). This function will ensure that the date values are consistent across the Orders and MasterCalendar tables by converting the timestamps to just dates. This is the most straightforward and effective way to ensure consistency in date-based analysis.

In Qlik Sense, dates and timestamps are stored as dual values (both text and numeric), and mismatches can lead to incomplete or incorrect analyses. By using Date(OrderDate) in both the Orders and MasterCalendar tables, you ensure that the analysis will have consistent date values, resolving the issue described.