Cisco 300-215 - Conducting Forensic Analysis and Incident Response Using Cisco CyberOps Technologies (CBRFIR)

The alert clearly identifies ET SCAN DirBuster Web App Scan in Progress, referencingSID 2008186, which is a Snort signature that specifically detectsDirBusteractivity. DirBuster is a well-known tool used for brute-forcing hidden directories and files on web servers.

The Cisco CyberOps Associate guide and OWASP both identifydirectory brute-forcingas a reconnaissance technique to find unprotected or misconfigured endpoints on web applications, typically prior to launching deeper attacks.

Therefore, the correct interpretation of the alert is:

C. brute-force attack against directories and files on the target webserver.

According to theCyberOps Technologies (CBRFIR) 300-215 study guidecurriculum, command-and-control (C2) communication is a strong indicator that a system has already been compromised and is actively under the control of an attacker. Sudden outbound traffic to high-risk regions and resolution of known malicious domains are high-confidence signs of an active threat. Therefore, prioritizing detection and disruption of this outbound traffic is critical to prevent further damage or data exfiltration.

While monitoring vulnerability exploitation (B) and gathering port scan data (D) are also valuable, they are more preventive or forensic in nature. The most immediate threat—and therefore the top priority—is stopping active C2 communications.

When analyzing suspicious files in a sandbox environment, a security analyst focuses on identifying and evaluating their behavior in a controlled setting to confirm potential malicious activity:

Inspect processes (B): Observing the processes that the file spawns or injects into during execution helps identify malicious actions or privilege escalation. This is a crucial part of dynamic analysis in the sandbox environment.

Inspect PE header (E): The PE (Portable Executable) header contains metadata about how the file will execute on Windows systems. It reveals details such as the entry point, libraries used, and whether the file is suspiciously crafted or packed, which can be strong indicators of malicious behavior.

The other options (A, C, D) are important in the broader forensic analysis, but within thesandbox dynamic analysis, focusing on process behavior and file execution headers is critical for determining how the file interacts with the system and whether it is indeed malicious.

One of the primary challenges of cloud forensics is the inability to physically access the underlying hardware (e.g., the hard drives storing VM or container data). This restricts investigators from performing traditional disk imaging and handling procedures, which are crucial for maintaining evidence integrity. This limitation is widely recognized in cloud forensics frameworks.

Correct answer: C. no physical access to the hard drive.

The Wireshark output shows SMB protocol transactions, including NT Create AndX Response and Write AndX Response, indicating the transfer of files or objects. SMB (Server Message Block) is a protocol used for file sharing and printer access in Windows networks. The log does not indicate phishing or redirection behavior but rather normal SMB communication such as accessing files or shared resources.

—

According to theCyberOps Technologies (CBRFIR) 300-215 study guide, during thepost-incident activityphase, it is critical to analyze lessons learned and update processes to ensure quicker and more efficient response in the future. Specifically:

Introducing a priority rating for incident response workloads(A) helps address the issue of team members being occupied with other tasks and unable to prioritize abnormal system activity. This ensures incidents are handled based on severity, not just workload.

Creating an executive team delegation plan(D) addresses the issue of delays due to unavailability of management for approvals. It ensures alternative decision-makers are available for swift action.

These strategies are based on the NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 recommendations and are highlighted in the Cisco guide’s post-incident activity phase (page 418), which emphasizeslessons learnedand how to reduce detection and response times for future incidents.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

From the exhibit, Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (formerly Threat Grid) has captured outbound HTTP POST communication to the IP address 51.38.124.206 on port 80. This destination is highlighted in the analysis under “Outbound HTTP POST Communications,” indicating exfiltration behavior or command-and-control (C2) signaling.

Key indicators:

The report shows that binary data was POSTed to this IP.

The source system generated 22 packets and sent 6,192 bytes.

The system has flagged the behavior with a severity of 25 and confidence of 25—suggesting that this is an IoC worth acting on.

Therefore, the artifacts suggest that the destination IP 51.38.124.206 is involved in malicious activity, and the correct answer is:

Answer: A. Destination IP 51.38.124.206 is identified as malicious.

The described scenario includes both internal alerts (unusual network traffic, failed logins, suspicious file access) and external intelligence indicating active ransomware campaigns in the same industry. This constitutes a strong combination of precursors and indicators, as defined in the NIST SP 800-61 incident handling model and reinforced in the Cisco CyberOps Associate curriculum.

According to the Cisco guide:

“Once an incident has occurred, the IR team needs to contain it quickly before it affects other systems and networks within the organization.”

“The containment phase is crucial in stopping the threat from spreading and compromising more systems”.

Given these indicators and the high-value nature of the data involved, it is essential to proactively isolate suspected systems and activate the incident response plan to prevent damage from potential ransomware.

—

The Wireshark capture shows a series of HTTP requests and responses:

The client (10.1.21.101) sends a GET request for/Lk9tdZ.

The server (209.141.51.196) responds withHTTP/1.1 302 Found, which is a standard HTTP status code indicating a redirection.

The subsequent GET request from the client is for/files/1.bin, which indicates it followed the redirect.

This behavior confirms that the server is issuing an HTTP 302 redirect from the initial request path/Lk9tdZto/files/1.bin. This is often observed in malware command-and-control behavior or file download staging.

Option A is incorrect: 302 is a status code, not a data size.

Option C is incorrect: port 49723 is a source/destination ephemeral port, not a redirect target.

Option D is incorrect: communication is over HTTP, not HTTPS (which would indicate encryption).

The syntax in the code snippet includes:

On Error Resume Next– a classic VBScript error-handling directive.

function ... end functionstructure.

Use ofMid(),Chr(), andAsc()functions – all commonly used in VBScript for string manipulation.

CInt()for conversion – typical in VBScript.

These characteristics alignexactly with VBScript, which is frequently used in malicious macros and obfuscated payloads for malware distribution, as covered in the Cisco CyberOps Associate curriculum when analyzing scripts and encoded threats.