IAPP AIGP - Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional

The most comprehensive way to identify a full range of risks — legal, ethical, operational, and societal — for a new AI model is through aformal impact assessment, such as aData Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)orAlgorithmic Impact Assessment.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report2025:

“Risk-based approaches are often distilled into organizational risk management efforts, which put impact assessments at the heart of deciding whether harm can be reduced.” (p. 29)

“DPIAs… help organizations identify, analyze and minimize data-related risks and demonstrate accountability.” (p. 30)

A. Environmental scanis too general.

B. Red teamingis useful for adversarial risk but not broad.

C. Integration testingfocuses on technical/system compatibility, not overall risk.

Open-source modelsoffer morecustomization flexibility, allowing organizations to fine-tune or adapt the model tofit their own workflows, branding, or compliance needs— making it preferable when deep control is needed.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report2025:

“Open-source AI allows organizations to review, adapt, and control model behavior in line with organizational needs and policies.” (p. 39)

Ensuringoversight and auditabilityrequires that the organization hassufficient access to data, documentation, and model internalsor outputs necessary for evaluation.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report2025:

“Access to technical documentation and system internals is essential to enable effective auditing, conformity checks, and accountability mechanisms.” (p. 11, 34)

Ais about liability, not auditability.

Bmatters for IP rights, not oversight.

Crelates to lifecycle responsibility but doesn’t guarantee audit access.

Deploying a challenger AI model alongside a champion model is a strategy used to compare the performance of different models in a real-world environment. This approach helps in providing a framework to consider alternatives to the champion model, automating real-time monitoring of the champion model, and performing testing on the champion model. However, retraining the champion model is not a reason to deploy a challenger model. Retraining is a separate process that involves updating the champion model with new data or techniques, which is not related to the use of a challenger model.

Small language models (SLMs)arelightweight, requireless compute, and arebetter suited to low-resource or edge environments, making them ideal for agility and efficiency.

From general AI best practices:

“SLMs can be deployed in environments with limited computing power, ensuring lower cost and faster integration in constrained contexts.” (aligned with industry-wide AI deployment strategies)

Anonymization is a privacy-enhancing technique that involves removing or permanently altering personal data elements to prevent the identification of individuals. In this case, the company obfuscated all personal data elements before training the model, which aligns with the definition of anonymization. This ensures that the data cannot be traced back to individuals, thereby protecting their privacy while still allowing the company to derive value from the dataset. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge, privacy-enhancing techniques section.

Human-centric AI focuses on improving the human experience by addressing individual needs and enhancing human capabilities. Option D exemplifies this by using virtual assistants to tailor educational content to each student's unique abilities and needs, thereby supporting personalized learning and improving educational outcomes. This use case directly benefits individuals by providing customized assistance and adapting to their learning pace and style, aligning with the principles of human-centric AI.

The EU AI Act imposes severalmandatory obligationson high-risk AI systems, butpublishing a detailed report on training dataisnotone of them.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report2025:

“It mandates drawing up technical documentation for high-risk AI systems, and requires high-risk AI systems to come with instructions for use that disclose various information, including characteristics, capabilities and performance limitations.” (p. 34)

“To make high-risk AI systems more traceable, it also requires AI systems to be able to automatically allow for the maintenance of logs throughout the AI life cycle.”

“Conducting post-market monitoring” and “conformity assessments” areexplicitrequirements for high-risk systems. (p. 34–35)

However,publishingdetailed training data is typicallyrequired only for general-purpose AI systems with systemic risk, not standard high-risk AI systems.

A. Log retention,B. Post-market monitoring, andC. Conformity assessmentsareall requiredunder the EU AI Act for high-risk systems.

TheEU AI Actapplies extraterritorially, meaning it affects entitiesoutside the EUwhen their AI systemsimpact individuals within the EU. However, it doesnotapply to systems that are developed, sold, or usedentirely outside of the EU—such as in theUK, unless they affect the EU market or individuals.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report2025:

“The act imposes regulatory obligations… depending on their capabilities, reach and computing power, certain GPAI systems are considered to present systemic risk and attract broadly similar obligations to those applicable to high-risk AI systems.” (p. 7)

“The EU AI Act is the world’s first comprehensive AI regulation… requirements apply to providers, deployers, importers, and distributors of AI systems when such systems are placed on the EU market.” (p. 7–8)

Thus:

A. Open source releasedoes not exclude applicability if deployed in the EU.

B. Deployment at an EU borderclearly invokes jurisdiction.

D. Training by an EU companycreates jurisdictional links.

C. Deployment only at UK checkpoints, withno EU use or impact, isoutside scope.

Respecting intellectual property rights means adhering to licensing terms and ensuring that generated content complies with these terms. A system that categorizes and applies filters based on licensing terms ensures that content is used legally and ethically, respecting the rights of content creators. While providing attribution is important, categorization and application of filters based on licensing terms are more directly tied to compliance with intellectual property laws. This principle is elaborated in the IAPP AIGP Body of Knowledge sections on intellectual property and compliance.