IAPP AIGP - Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional

The failures in semi-autonomous vehicles due to sensors misinterpreting environmental surroundings, such as sunlight, are examples of brittleness. Brittleness in AI systems refers to their inability to handle variations in input data or unexpected conditions, leading to failures when the system encounters situations that were not adequately covered during training. These systems perform well under specific conditions but fail when those conditions change. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on AI System Robustness and Failures.

In the machine learning context, feature engineering is the process of extracting attributes and variables from raw data to make it suitable for training an AI model. This step is crucial as it transforms raw data into meaningful features that can improve the model's accuracy and performance. Feature engineering involves selecting, modifying, and creating new features that help the model learn more effectively. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on AI Model Development and Feature Engineering.

When an AI system causessignificant false positives, especially in sensitive contexts likefraud detection, the priority is tohalt harmful activityand perform a full assessment. Continued use without understanding the fault may cause furthercustomer harmand legal exposure.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report 2024:

“Incident management plans should enable identification, escalation, and system rollback to prevent continued harm from malfunctioning AI systems.” (p. 12, 35)

Private LLMs offer advantages likecustomizability,reduced hallucination,confidentiality, andalignment with enterprise-specific tasks, but theydo not inherently reduce the time or effortneeded fordata validation or verification— which remains an essential step regardless of model privacy.

From the AI risk and quality sections:

“Ensuring the quality of the data… is highly contextual and must be validated regardless of the model’s deployment environment.” (p. 17)

B, C, Dare legitimate benefits of private LLMs.

Ais incorrect — validation still requires time and resources.

Bias in AI can be reduced during the planning and design phases through stakeholder involvement, human oversight, and careful data collection. While feature selection is critical in the development phase, it does not specifically occur during planning and design. Ensuring diverse stakeholder involvement and human oversight helps identify and mitigate potential biases early, and data collection ensures a representative dataset. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on AI Development Lifecycle and Bias Mitigation.

Establishing a global AI governance infrastructure involves several key elements, including providing training to foster a culture that promotes ethical behavior, creating policies and procedures to manage third-party risk, and understanding differences in norms across countries. While publicly disclosing ethical principles can enhance transparency and trust, it is not a core element necessary for the establishment of a governance infrastructure. The focus is more on internal processes and structures rather than public disclosure. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on AI Governance and Infrastructure.

Training an AI model is time-consuming primarily due tomodel complexity,large data volumes, and the need forhigh-quality, well-prepared data.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report 2024:

“Most AI requires sizeable amounts of high-quality data… to ensure desired and accurate output.” (p. 15)

“The accuracy of AI model outputs depends significantly on the quality of their inputs.” (p. 24)

“Complex AI systems… with many parameters… result in long development and training phases.” (p. 32)

B. Maturity of governanceaffects oversight, not training time.

D. Number of stakeholdersaffects alignment, not direct training duration.

TheEU AI Actapplies extraterritorially, meaning it affects entitiesoutside the EUwhen their AI systemsimpact individuals within the EU. However, it doesnotapply to systems that are developed, sold, or usedentirely outside of the EU—such as in theUK, unless they affect the EU market or individuals.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report 2024:

“The act imposes regulatory obligations… depending on their capabilities, reach and computing power, certain GPAI systems are considered to present systemic risk and attract broadly similar obligations to those applicable to high-risk AI systems.” (p. 7)

“The EU AI Act is the world’s first comprehensive AI regulation… requirements apply to providers, deployers, importers, and distributors of AI systems when such systems are placed on the EU market.” (p. 7–8)

Thus:

A. Open source releasedoes not exclude applicability if deployed in the EU.

B. Deployment at an EU borderclearly invokes jurisdiction.

D. Training by an EU companycreates jurisdictional links.

C. Deployment only at UK checkpoints, withno EU use or impact, isoutside scope.

The EU AI Act imposes severalmandatory obligationson high-risk AI systems, butpublishing a detailed report on training dataisnotone of them.

From theAI Governance in Practice Report 2024:

“It mandates drawing up technical documentation for high-risk AI systems, and requires high-risk AI systems to come with instructions for use that disclose various information, including characteristics, capabilities and performance limitations.” (p. 34)

“To make high-risk AI systems more traceable, it also requires AI systems to be able to automatically allow for the maintenance of logs throughout the AI life cycle.”

“Conducting post-market monitoring” and “conformity assessments” areexplicitrequirements for high-risk systems. (p. 34–35)

However,publishingdetailed training data is typicallyrequired only for general-purpose AI systems with systemic risk, not standard high-risk AI systems.

A. Log retention,B. Post-market monitoring, andC. Conformity assessmentsareall requiredunder the EU AI Act for high-risk systems.