CompTIA CS0-003 - CompTIA CyberSecurity Analyst CySA+ Certification Exam
A security analyst is reviewing the logs of a web server and notices that an attacker has attempted to exploit a SQL injection vulnerability. Which of the following tools can the analyst use to analyze the attack and prevent future attacks?
An organization has experienced a breach of customer transactions. Under the terms of PCI DSS, which of the following groups should the organization report the breach to?
An analyst has discovered the following suspicious command:

Which of the following would best describe the outcome of the command?
A malicious actor has gained access to an internal network by means of social engineering. The actor does not want to lose access in order to continue the attack. Which of the following best describes the current stage of the Cyber Kill Chain that the threat actor is currently operating in?
The SOC receives a number of complaints regarding a recent uptick in desktop error messages that are associated with workstation access to an internal web application. An analyst, identifying a recently modified XML file on the web server, retrieves a copy of this file for review, which contains the following code:

Which of The following XML schema constraints would stop these desktop error messages from appearing?
A vulnerability analyst is writing a report documenting the newest, most critical vulnerabilities identified in the past month. Which of the following public MITRE repositories would be best to review?
A vulnerability scan of a web server that is exposed to the internet was recently completed. A security analyst is reviewing the resulting vector strings:
Vulnerability 1: CVSS: 3.0/AV:N/AC: L/PR: N/UI : N/S: U/C: H/I : L/A:L
Vulnerability 2: CVSS: 3.0/AV: L/AC: H/PR:N/UI : N/S: U/C: L/I : L/A: H
Vulnerability 3: CVSS: 3.0/AV:A/AC: H/PR: L/UI : R/S: U/C: L/I : H/A:L
Vulnerability 4: CVSS: 3.0/AV: P/AC: L/PR: H/UI : N/S: U/C: H/I:N/A:L
Which of the following vulnerabilities should be patched first?
A security analyst reviews a packet capture and identifies the following output as anomalous:
13:49:57.553161 TP10.203.10.17.45701>10.203.10.22.12930:Flags[FPU],seq108331482,win1024,urg0,length0
13:49:57.553162 IP10.203.10.17.45701>10.203.10.22.48968:Flags[FPU],seq108331482,win1024,urg0,length0
...
Which of the following activities explains the output?
Which of the following techniques can help a SOC team to reduce the number of alerts related to the internal security activities that the analysts have to triage?
