Databricks Databricks-Certified-Professional-Data-Engineer - Databricks Certified Data Engineer Professional Exam

The events are that a data engineer, User A, has promoted a new pipeline to production by using the REST API to programmatically create several jobs, and a DevOps engineer, User B, has configured an external orchestration tool to trigger job runs through the REST API. Both users authorized the REST API calls using their personal access tokens. The workspace audit logs are logs that record user activities in a Databricks workspace, such as creating, updating, or deleting objects like clusters, jobs, notebooks, or tables. The workspace audit logs also capture the identity of the user who performed each activity, as well as the time and details of the activity. Because these events are managed separately, User A will have their identity associated with the job creation events and User B will have their identity associated with the job run events in the workspace audit logs. Verified References: [Databricks Certified Data Engineer Professional], under “Databricks Workspace” section; Databricks Documentation, under “Workspace audit logs” section.

The error being raised is an AnalysisException, which is a type of exception that occurs when Spark SQL cannot analyze or execute a query due to some logical or semantic error1. In this case, the error message indicates that the query cannot resolve the column name ‘heartrateheartrateheartrate’ given the input columns ‘heartrate’ and ‘age’. This means that there is no column in the table named ‘heartrateheartrateheartrate’, and the query is invalid. A possible cause of this error is a typo or a copy-paste mistake in the query. To fix this error, the query should use a valid column name that exists in the table, such as ‘heartrate’. References: AnalysisException

Maximum concurrent runs: Set to 1. There must be only one instance of each query concurrently active. Retries: Set to Unlimited. https://docs.databricks.com/en/structured-streaming/query-recovery.html

In Databricks, using the Secrets module allows for secure management of sensitive information such as database credentials. Granting 'Read' permissions on a secret key that maps to database credentials for a specific team ensures that only members of that team can access these credentials. This approach aligns with the principle of least privilege, granting users the minimum level of access required to perform their jobs, thus enhancing security.

Option B correctly fills in the blank to meet the specified requirements. Option B uses the “cloudFiles.schemaLocation” option, which is required for the schema detection and evolution functionality of Databricks Auto Loader. Additionally, option B uses the “mergeSchema” option, which is required for the schema evolution functionality of Databricks Auto Loader. Finally, option B uses the “writeStream” method, which is required for the incremental processing of JSON files as they arrive in a source directory. The other options are incorrect because they either omit the required options, use the wrong method, or use the wrong format. References:

Configure schema inference and evolution in Auto Loader: https://docs.databricks.com/en/ingestion/auto-loader/schema.html

Write streaming data: https://docs.databricks.com/spark/latest/structured-streaming/writing-streaming-data.html

To validate that all records from the source are included in the derived table, creating a view that performs a left outer join between the validation_copy table and the report table is effective. The view can highlight any discrepancies, such as null values in the report table's key columns, indicating missing records. This view can then be referenced in DLT (Delta Live Tables) expectations for the report table to ensure data integrity. This approach allows for a comprehensive comparison between the source and the derived table.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Exact extract: “Job clusters are created for a job run and terminate when the job completes.”

Partitioning a Delta Lake table is a strategy used to improve query performance by dividing the table into distinct segments based on the values of a specific column. This approach allows queries to scan only the relevant partitions, thereby reducing the amount of data read and enhancing performance.

Considerations for Choosing a Partition Column:

Cardinality: Columns with high cardinality (i.e., a large number of unique values) are generally poor choices for partitioning. High cardinality can lead to a large number of small partitions, which can degrade performance.

Query Patterns: The partition column should align with common query filters. If queries frequently filter data based on a particular column, partitioning by that column can be beneficial.

Partition Size: Each partition should ideally contain at least 1 GB of data. This ensures that partitions are neither too small (leading to too many partitions) nor too large (negating the benefits of partitioning).

Evaluation of Columns:

date:

Cardinality: Typically low, especially if data spans over days, months, or years.

Query Patterns: Many analytical queries filter data based on date ranges.

Partition Size: Likely to meet the 1 GB threshold per partition, depending on data volume.

user_id:

Cardinality: High, as each user has a unique ID.

Query Patterns: While some queries might filter by user_id, the high cardinality makes it unsuitable for partitioning.

Partition Size: Partitions could be too small, leading to inefficiencies.

post_id:

Cardinality: Extremely high, with each post having a unique ID.

Query Patterns: Unlikely to be used for filtering large datasets.

Partition Size: Each partition would be very small, resulting in a large number of partitions.

post_time:

Cardinality: High, especially if it includes exact timestamps.

Query Patterns: Queries might filter by time, but the high cardinality poses challenges.

Partition Size: Similar to user_id, partitions could be too small.

Conclusion:

Given the considerations, the date column is the most suitable candidate for partitioning. It has low cardinality, aligns with common query patterns, and is likely to result in appropriately sized partitions.

https://delta.io/blog/2023-04-19-faster-aggregations-metadata/#:~:text=You%20can%20get%20the%20number,a%20given%20Delta%20table%20version .

Delta Lake's Liquid Clustering is an advanced feature that improves query performance by dynamically clustering data without requiring costly compaction steps like traditional Z-ordering.

When performing writes to a Liquid Clustered table, some write operations automatically maintain clustering, while others do not.

Explanation of Each Option:

(A) spark.writestream.format('delta').mode('append') (Correct Answer)

Reason: Streaming writes (writestream) do not support Liquid Clustering because streaming data arrives in micro-batches.

Since Liquid Clustering needs efficient global reorganization of files, streaming append operations don't provide sufficient data volume at a time to be effectively clustered.

Delta Lake documentation states that Liquid Clustering is only supported for batch writes.

(B) CTAS and RTAS statements

Reason: CREATE TABLE AS SELECT (CTAS) and REPLACE TABLE AS SELECT (RTAS) are batch operations and can enforce Liquid Clustering.

These operations create or replace a table based on a query result, and since they are batch-based, Liquid Clustering applies.

(C) INSERT INTO operations

Reason: INSERT INTO is supported for Liquid Clustering because it is a batch operation.

While it may not be as efficient as MERGE or COPY INTO, clustering is applied upon execution.

(D) spark.write.format('delta').mode('append')

Reason: Batch append operations are supported for Liquid Clustering.

Unlike streaming append, batch writes allow the optimizer to re-cluster data efficiently.

Conclusion:

Since streaming append operations do not support Liquid Clustering, option (A) is the correct answer.