HP HPE7-A02 - Aruba Certified Network Security Professional Exam

802.1X and User Role Download:

AOS-CX switches use RADIUS attributes to dynamically download user roles from CPPM.

The HPE-User-Role VSA (Vendor-Specific Attribute) must be configured in the RADIUS enforcement profiles to specify which role the switch should apply.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. Exporting roles in XML is not needed for dynamic role download.

Option B: Incorrect. Switches authenticate via RADIUS, not admin accounts with specific privileges.

Option C: Correct. RADIUS enforcement profiles must include the HPE-User-Role VSA to implement user role download.

Option D: Incorrect. TPM certificates are unrelated to RADIUS-based user role downloads.

Access to the Onboard portal is controlled by a dedicated Pre-Auth service in ClearPass Policy Manager:

The “ClearPass Onboard Service Pre-Auth” service defines which authentication sources (e.g., AD domain, local DB, guest) are used when users log into the Onboard web portal.

To restrict access to domain users only, you edit this Pre-Auth service to use only the Active Directory auth source (and appropriate authorization checks, such as group membership).

Exam and configuration references for ClearPass Onboard clearly identify the Onboard Pre-Auth service as the place where you control who can log into the Onboard portal.

Network Settings and Provisioning profiles in Onboard govern SSID, profiles, and device configuration, not portal user authentication.

The 802.1X services for wireless control network access after onboarding, not login to the onboarding portal itself.

Therefore, to limit the portal to domain users, you should edit the ClearPass Onboard Service Pre-Auth service on CPPM → Option B.

To enable the detection of rogue APs with HPE Aruba Networking Wireless IDS/IPS (WIDS/WIPS) on AOS-10 APs managed in HPE Aruba Networking Central, each AP must have a Foundation with Security license. This license enables advanced security features, including rogue AP detection, which is crucial for maintaining a secure wireless environment and protecting against unauthorized access points.

When HPE Aruba Networking Central detects an Infrastructure Attack, such as "Detect adhoc using Valid SSID," the next step is to locate the general area of the threat. You can use HPE Aruba Networking Central floorplans or the identities of the detecting APs to pinpoint the approximate location of the adhoc network. This allows you to physically investigate and address the source of the threat, ensuring that unauthorized or rogue networks are quickly identified and mitigated.

Implementing user-based tunneling (UBT) on AOS-CX switches is beneficial for applying enhanced security features such as deep packet inspection (DPI) to wired traffic. UBT allows the traffic from specific users or devices to be tunneled to a central controller or security appliance where advanced security policies, including DPI, can be applied. This approach ensures that even wired traffic benefits from the same level of security and inspection typically available for wireless traffic, thus enhancing overall network security.

To control which commands managers are allowed to enter on AOS-CX switches using HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) as a TACACS+ server, you need to add the Shell service to the TACACS+ enforcement profiles for the managers. This service allows you to define and enforce specific command sets and access privileges for users authenticated via TACACS+. By configuring the Shell service in the enforcement profile, you can specify the commands that are permitted or denied for the managers, ensuring controlled and secure access to the switch's command-line interface.

What is Zero Trust Security?

Zero Trust Security is a security model that operates on the principle of "never trust, always verify."

It focuses on securing resources (data, applications, systems) and continuously verifying the identity and trust level of users and devices, regardless of whether they are inside or outside the network.

The primary aim is to reduce reliance on perimeter defenses and implement granular access controls to protect individual resources.

Analysis of Each Option

A. Companies must apply the same access controls to all users, regardless of identity:

Incorrect:

Zero Trust enforces dynamic and identity-based access controls, not the same static controls for everyone.

Users and devices are granted access based on their specific context, role, and trust level.

B. Companies that support remote workers cannot achieve zero trust security and must determine if the benefits outweigh the cost:

Incorrect:

Zero Trust is particularly effective for securing remote work environments by verifying and authenticating remote users and devices before granting access to resources.

The model is adaptable to hybrid and remote work scenarios, making this statement false.

C. Companies should focus on protecting their resources rather than on protecting the boundaries of their internal network:

Correct:

Zero Trust shifts the focus from perimeter security (traditional network boundaries) to protecting specific resources.

This includes implementing measures such as:

Micro-segmentation.

Continuous monitoring of user and device trust levels.

Dynamic access control policies.

The emphasis is on securing sensitive assets rather than assuming an internal network is inherently safe.

D. Companies can achieve zero trust security by strengthening their perimeter security to detect a wider range of threats:

Incorrect:

Zero Trust challenges the traditional reliance on perimeter defenses (firewalls, VPNs) as the sole security mechanism.

Strengthening perimeter security is not sufficient for Zero Trust, as this model assumes threats can already exist inside the network.

Final Explanation

Zero Trust Security emphasizes protecting resources at the granular level rather than relying on the traditional security perimeter, which makes C the most accurate description.

References

NIST Zero Trust Architecture Guide.

Zero Trust Principles and Implementation in Modern Networks by HPE Aruba.

"Never Trust, Always Verify" Framework Overview from Cybersecurity Best Practices.

When establishing a cluster of HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass servers, it is recommended to install a CA-signed certificate for HTTPS on the Subscriber before it joins the cluster. This ensures secure communication between the servers in the cluster and provides a trusted certificate for client connections.

1.HTTPS Security: A CA-signed certificate for HTTPS ensures that all web-based communication to and from the ClearPass server is encrypted and secure.

2.Cluster Communication: Secure communication between ClearPass nodes in the cluster is essential for synchronization and data integrity.

3.Client Trust: Clients accessing the ClearPass server will trust the CA-signed certificate, avoiding security warnings and ensuring smooth operations.

The use case for the HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass OnGuard dissolvable agent is implementing a one-time compliance scan. The dissolvable agent is designed to perform a compliance check without requiring a permanent installation on the client device. This is ideal for environments where a quick, temporary assessment of the device's security posture is needed without the overhead of a persistent agent.

1.Dissolvable Agent: The dissolvable agent is downloaded and executed on the client device for a single session, performing the necessary compliance checks before being removed automatically.

2.One-time Compliance Scan: This method is particularly useful for guest or unmanaged devices where a temporary compliance scan is sufficient to ensure security standards are met.

3.Minimal Impact: Since the agent does not persist on the client device, it minimizes the impact on the user's system and does not require ongoing maintenance or updates.

The exhibit reveals duplicate IP addresses detected for 10.1.140.6, associated with two different MAC addresses:

88:56:56:ab:c6:89

88:13:30:a3:02:00

Key observations:

Duplicate IP Address Detection:

The message "Duplicate IP address detected for 10.1.140.6" clearly indicates two devices claiming the same IP address.

This typically occurs when one device spoofs the MAC address of another device to intercept or disrupt traffic.

MAC Spoofing Context:

MAC spoofing is a tactic used to impersonate another device's hardware address to gain unauthorized access to a network.

By spoofing a legitimate IP-MAC pairing, an attacker can bypass security mechanisms or cause denial-of-service conditions.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option B (Mirroring Misconfigured): While mirroring misconfiguration can duplicate traffic, it does not lead to a "duplicate IP detected" alert.

Option C (Misconfigured DHCP): Misconfigurations usually result in DHCP conflicts, but they do not typically involve two different MAC addresses for the same IP.

Option D (ARP Poisoning/MITM): ARP poisoning involves falsified ARP tables, but it does not directly trigger duplicate IP address detection. Instead, ARP packets flood the network.

Conclusion:

The evidence strongly suggests MAC spoofing, as two different MAC addresses are claiming the same IP address (10.1.140.6). This behavior is typical of attempts to gain unauthorized access or disrupt network operations.