HP HPE7-A08 - HPE Aruba Networking Certified Professional – Switching

When adding a switch with an existing configuration into a group in Aruba Central, the group requires devices to have factory default configurations to allow Central to apply the group config correctly.

If the switch has an existing configuration, synchronization and auto-commit may fail because of configuration conflicts.

Option A: Pending authorization is unrelated to config synchronization.

Option C: Auto-commit can be disabled but does not block syncing existing config.

Option D: VSX support limitations are irrelevant here.

Therefore, the likely cause is that only switches with factory default config can be added to a group with existing config.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

When troubleshooting intermittent connectivity issues with known source and destination IPs, the Follow the path methodology is most suitable. This involves tracing the packet flow from source to destination step-by-step, checking each device or segment for failures.

Spot the difference compares configurations, which is less targeted here.

Divide and conquer isolates sections but follow the path is more direct for connectivity.

Top-down/bottom-up is more general troubleshooting.

OSPF neighbors on broadcast networks typically reach the 2WAY state during the DR/BDR election process. It is normal behavior for OSPF neighbors on a broadcast network to be in the 2WAY state until a Designated Router (DR) and Backup DR (BDR) are elected.

The tie in DR election explains why multiple neighbors can be in 2WAY.

No OSPF networks advertised would not cause 2WAY.

IGMP snooping does not affect OSPF adjacency states.

To monitor BGP neighbor state changes and automatically create a helpdesk ticket, the NAE (Network Analytics Engine) action to use is a REST API call. This allows integration with external ticketing or automation systems, enabling automated ticket creation when a monitored event occurs.

Executing shell commands, sending emails, or generating logs are limited to internal actions and do not integrate as seamlessly with helpdesk systems.

REST API calls allow custom integration and automation.

In VSX architecture, the Inter-Switch Link (ISL) is implemented as a Link Aggregation Group (LAG). To ensure proper forwarding and VLAN consistency, the ISL LAG must allow all configured VLANs. This allows VSX synchronization and data forwarding across all VLANs that span the two switches.

ISL traffic is not specifically tagged with EF QoS markings by default.

ISL traffic is not encapsulated in GRE tunnels.

The ISL LAG does not automatically include all VLANs; VLANs must be allowed on the LAG explicitly.

Hence, the LAG must be configured to allow all VLANs.

The LACP fallback command in Aruba VSX configurations allows the system to continue forwarding traffic even if LACP negotiation fails or is not established. This is useful when provisioning a gateway or link that does not support LACP, ensuring that the port remains operational in a static manner.

It is not specifically for backward compatibility with LACP v1.

It does not relate to operation with a single partner interface.

It also is not about active/passive LACP modes per se.

Therefore, LACP fallback is configured to support provisioning a gateway without LACP.

To capture packets on an HPE Aruba CX switch and view the output remotely in real-time, the best practice is to use a mirror session that forwards traffic to a remote device running a packet analyzer such as Wireshark. ERSPAN (Encapsulated Remote Switched Port Analyzer) allows the mirror traffic to be encapsulated in GRE and sent over an IP network to a remote monitoring station. This method ensures full packet capture with no local resource constraints and provides full visibility to the analyst.

Option B (using tcpdump on the switch) only provides summarized or limited capture locally.

Option C (mirroring to another switch port) only allows local monitoring and does not provide remote real-time viewing.

Option D (mirror to CPU and then use tshark) is less efficient and may be resource-intensive on the switch.

Therefore, configuring ERSPAN to a remote Wireshark host is the recommended and best way.

In the exhibit, the CX8325 switch ports 1/1/47 and 1/1/48 are connected in a VSX setup. According to Aruba VSX best practices, ports on the CX8325 switch that serve as ISL or VSX interconnects should use SFP28 optics for 25Gbps links. If SFP56 optics are used, it would be incorrect because CX8325 ports are designed to support SFP28 modules for these speeds.

CX6300 ports use SFP56 or QSFP28 depending on model and link speed.

CX8300 series ports designed for QSFP28 for higher speeds.

Hence, the best practice is to use SFP28 on CX8325 for the interconnect links.

The question relates to configuring port 1/1/44 on an Aruba CX 8325 switch to connect to a 2930F switch (Aruba 2930F series). The key factor is interoperability between these two devices, especially regarding link aggregation and port channel settings.

The Aruba 2930F typically uses static or LACP link aggregation with standard settings. To connect an Aruba CX 8325 port to a 2930F port, the CX configuration must align with the 2930F settings, particularly regarding:

Enabling LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) on the port.

Correct VLAN tagging or trunk mode.

Matching speed and duplex settings.

From the options given, answer A corresponds to enabling LACP with appropriate trunk configuration that matches the 2930F. The other options either have mismatches in aggregation or trunking mode or missing LACP.