Juniper JN0-232 - Security, Associate (JNCIA-SEC)

The SRX Series devices support third-party antivirus scanning engines such asAvira. To use the Avira antivirus engine, administrators must explicitly enable the engine and ensure that the required components are properly loaded.

Enable in configuration mode:

The Avira antivirus engine must be enabled under UTM configuration mode. This step ensures the SRX device uses the Avira scanning engine for antivirus inspection.

Example:

set security utm feature-profile anti-virus avira-engine enable

Reboot the SRX device:

A system reboot is required after enabling the Avira engine to load the Avira antivirus components into memory.

Without a reboot, the Avira engine will not become active.

Why not the others?

Restarting themgdprocess (Option A) only reloads the management daemon and does not load antivirus engines.

Enabling inoperational mode(Option B) is not supported; the configuration must be applied in configuration mode.

Therefore, the correct actions to use Avira Antivirus are:Enable the Avira engine in configuration mode (Option D) and reboot the SRX device (Option C).

To verify and demonstrate the effectiveness of content filtering on an SRX firewall, administrators use operational mode commands that display UTM statistics.

The commandshow security utm content-filtering statisticsprovides detailed counters showing how many connections were inspected, how many were blocked, and other related metrics.

This is the correct way to measure and demonstrate filtering effectiveness.

Commands in options A, B, and C provide status information for antispam, antivirus, and web filtering features, but they do not provide content filter effectiveness statistics.

Global policies (Option D):Evaluated before zone-based policies. They allow centralized control and can apply across all zones. Perfect for Internet-to-private traffic that must be enforced before other rules.

Routing policy (Option A):Controls routing decisions, not traffic forwarding/security.

Default policy (Option B):Denies all traffic by default, but cannot be customized for early evaluation.

Zone policy (Option C):Zone-based policies apply after global policies and are limited to specific zone pairs.

Correct Policy Type:Global policy

Global security policies extend the flexibility of policy enforcement across the SRX. They are not tied to specific source and destination zones:

From-zone and to-zone contexts are not required(Option A). Global policies apply across all zones unless restricted by match conditions.

Global security policies do not require specific zone contexts(Option B is incorrect).

Global policies areprocessed after zone-based policies, not before. This means that zone-based security policies take precedence (Option C is incorrect).

Administrators can configure bothzone-based security policies and global security policies at the same timeon the same device (Option D is correct).

This allows flexible designs where specific policies can be enforced by zone, while general policies can be applied globally without duplicating rules across multiple zones.

In Junos OS, traffic is classified into three main categories:

Transit traffic:

Defined as traffic thatenters one interface and exits another interface.

It is handledentirely in the forwarding plane (Packet Forwarding Engine).

Example: User data packets moving between trust and untrust zones.

Correct →Option A.

Exception traffic:

Traffic requiring processing by theRouting Engine (control plane), such as routing updates or management traffic.

MatchesOption C/D, but that is not transit traffic.

Control traffic:

Management or routing-related, handled by the control plane.

Rate-limiting (Option B):

This applies specifically toexception trafficto protect the Routing Engine, not to transit traffic.

Correct Statement:Transit traffic is traffic that is processed solely through the forwarding plane.

SRX devices operate on adefault deny-all policyif no explicit match is found:

If a packet does not match any configuredzone-basedorglobalpolicy, it is implicitly denied.

The traffic is discarded silently by the default security policy (Option A).

Option B:No predefined “safe zone” exists.

Option C:Logging occurs only if explicitly configured; default deny does not automatically log traffic.

Option D:Incorrect, since the firewall defaults to deny, not permit.

Correct Behavior:Traffic is discarded by the default security policy.

Security policies in Junos OS match traffic based on specific criteria:

Source and destination addresses(Option B).

Application(Option D), which may be defined as services (e.g., tcp/80) or recognized through AppID.

Other options:

MAC addresses(Option A) are not used in policy matching; policies operate at Layer 3/4.

Interface name(Option C) is used in firewall filters, not in security policy definitions.

Correct Criteria:Source address and Applications

From the exhibit:

The internal host (172.25.11.101) is located in theTrust zone.

The external address (203.0.113.199/30) is used for communication with the ISP.

The requirement is thatsessions can only be initiated from the external device(the ISP or untrust side) toward the internal host.

This requirement matches the behavior ofDestination NAT:

Destination NAT only (Option A):Maps the external/public IP (203.0.113.199) to the internal/private IP (172.25.11.101). This allows inbound connections to be translated and sent to the internal host. The internal host cannot initiate outbound sessions, since the translation only applies to inbound traffic.

Source NAT only (Option B):Used for outbound sessions from internal private IPs to the Internet. This does not meet the requirement.

Static PAT (Option C):Maps a single port of a public IP to a private IP/port. The exhibit does not indicate a port-based translation.

Static NAT and source NAT (Option D):Would provide bidirectional communication, allowing sessions to be initiated in both directions. This contradicts the requirement.

Correct NAT Type:Destination NAT only

Inbound Flow (before NAT):Source =10.20.30.40(internal private IP)Destination =203.0.113.1(public DNS server)

Outbound Flow (after NAT):Source =192.0.2.1(translated IP)Destination =203.0.113.1(unchanged)

Analysis:

Thesource IP (10.20.30.40)was translated to192.0.2.1. This indicatesSource NATwas applied →Option B is correct.

Thedestination IP changedbetween the inbound and outbound view. Inbound it was203.0.113.1, and outbound it is still203.0.113.1in appearance, but notice the reversal: the session entry shows it as the outbound "source" side. This confirmsDestination NAT translation has occurredfor return flow consistency →Option D is correct.

Option A:Incorrect. The original source IP was indeed translated.

Option C:Incorrect. The destination IP did change in the flow processing.

Correct Statements:

The original source IP address was translated to a new source IP address.

The original destination IP address was translated to a new destination IP address.