CIPS L4M4 - Ethical and Responsible Sourcing

Explanation

The correct answers are 'it is easy to drive down costs' (as you can pit the suppliers against each other) and 'low risk of failure to supply' (if one supplier can't provide what you need, the other supplier might be able to).

Economies of scale and supplier loyalty are advantages of single-sourcing.

There is a risk of failure to supply is a risk associated with single sourcing.

There's a useful table of advantages and disadvantages of single / multi sourcing on p.22. Types of sourcing is a key topic for the exam.

Financial stability is a critical risk factor in high-value contracts. If a supplier collapses financially during contract performance, the buying organisation faces supply disruption, increased costs, and reputational risk. Financial assessments help identify vulnerabilities such as high debt, poor liquidity, or over-reliance on limited customers. While profitability, credit scores, and broader capability assessments are useful, the most pressing concern is ensuring continuity of supply. Ethical and responsible sourcing requires buyers to consider the long-term viability of suppliers, not just short-term savings. This aligns with responsible practice, protecting stakeholders, end customers, and the organisation’s own obligations.

Incoterms clarify responsibilities between buyers and sellers, reducing certain risks but not eliminating them entirely. Responsible sourcing requires recognising that Incoterms are only part of risk management in international trade, and other factors, such as supplier reliability and quality, must be considered.

Explanation

a balance sheet shows 'equity, assets and liabilities'. The other financial statements you need to know for this exam are cash flow statements and and income statements.

If you're not familiar with these three I strongly recommend you do some further reading on this before the exam if you can. This is helpful: How the 3 Financial Statements are Linked Together - Step by Step (corporatefinanceinstitute.com)

Protectionist measures are designed to shield domestic industries from foreign competition. The most common form is import duties (tariffs), which raise the landed cost of goods entering the country. This creates a barrier to trade by making imports less competitive compared to local products. Arbitration is a dispute resolution method, not a trade barrier. Carnets are documents for temporary duty-free movement of goods, and inward processing relief is an exemption for goods imported for re-export. Responsible sourcing requires buyers to anticipate the cost and risk implications of protectionism when engaging in international supply.

Explanation

The correct answer is Invitation to Tender. This is sent out to suitable suppliers inviting them to bid for the opportunity.

A PQQ - pre-qualification questions naire- is sent to suppliers to see if they are suitable. The QUESTION NO: states these suppliers have already been deemed suitable, so they've already passed PQQ

A RFQ - request for quotation- would be used when the only variable is price, so is not suitable for complex tenders.

RFT isn't a thing. I made the last one up.

Incorporating standards within specifications provides clear guidelines for suppliers, reducing ambiguity and helping ensure consistency in quality and performance. This aligns with ethical and responsible sourcing practices by promoting transparency and setting consistent expectations for suppliers.

Total Quality Management (TQM) practices and ISO 9001 certification are indicators of a supplier’s commitment to quality. Responsible sourcing evaluates these factors to ensure suppliers meet high-quality standards and continuous improvement expectations.

Explanation

A Bill of Exchange is a payment instruction - it says who will pay whom and when.

Bill of Exchange Definition: Examples and How It Works (investopedia.com)

Explanation

the correct answer is 'Yes- a low gearing ratio means the company's finances are made up of equity rather than debt'.

Remember low gearing = good (based on equity), high gearing = bad (based on debt). Anything over 50% is considered high.

The two no answers are therefore incorrect and you can discount these straight away. The other yes answer is one of those answers which COULD be true, but isn't always true, and we'd need more information to know for sure. When you get options like this there will be one that is always right and one which is sometimes right - so always pick the always right one.

Dealing with supply chain disruptions is complex, and depending what the disruption is, how big it is, what the industry is etc determines whether a supplier can handle it or not. Because there's more factors to consider than just gearing, this isn't the right answer.