CIPS L4M4 - Ethical and Responsible Sourcing

Weighted points systems are appropriate for complex or high-value purchases where multiple factors (e.g., quality, sustainability, delivery) must be balanced. For simple, low-value purchases like pens, price is typically the only differentiating factor. Using a weighted points system would overcomplicate the process, wasting resources. Responsible sourcing requires proportionality — applying robust evaluation methods where justified, while keeping processes simple and efficient for routine purchases. This ensures efficiency without compromising governance, freeing procurement resources for strategic projects.

Explanation

Carry out due diligence is the correct answer. The other answers are incorrect:

- ensure all 46 suppliers publish an Anti Slavery Statement in line with the Modern Slavery Act is wrong because the question states that some suppliers are international. The legislation is UK, meaning international suppliers don't have to do the statement. It also only applies to companies with a turnover of £36m, and some of Zeb's suppliers may be smaller than this.

- work with less suppliers to reduce the risk of slavery entering the supply chain is a silly answer be-cause Zeb probably needs all of his suppliers. There's probably a reason he uses that many.

- ask all suppliers to get Fair Trade accredited is also a silly answer. Fair Trade only exists in some industries such as cocoa and bananas. Zig Zag Zips is in manufacturing so it's probably not going to be able to fairtrade accredit some of the stuff it buys.

Explanation

The correct answer is 'the supplier has a lot of long-term debt'. Gearing is a measure of how the business is being funded and looks at the ratio of debt to equity. For example if they have taken out lots of loans and mortgages, this would equate to a lot of debt which means a poor gearing ratio.

Gearing is a hot topic for the exam.

Accepting an invitation under such circumstances would violate ethical standards, as it could create a conflict of interest. Ethical sourcing and procurement practices require impartiality, and any perceived favoritism or bias can harm the organisation's integrity.