PMI PMI-ACP - PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP)

The correct answer is A – Refocus the sprint review meetings to demonstrate working software and seek feedback on the product.

Sprint reviews are designed to showcase the completed product increment to stakeholders and receive feedback. The primary goal is to validate that the work delivered provides value to the customer—not to present technical details. Demonstrating working software is one of the core tenets of Agile.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Sprint reviews are working sessions designed to elicit feedback and foster collaboration. Teams demonstrate completed work and adjust the backlog based on stakeholder input.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Value Delivery)

Mike Griffiths confirms:

“The output of every iteration should be potentially shippable product. The sprint review is for stakeholders to see that output and provide feedback to inform future development.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 2 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Other options explained:

B may be helpful, but it doesn’t solve the immediate issue of misaligned sprint reviews.

C misunderstands the purpose of the sprint review—it’s not about architecture.

D changes the audience instead of correcting the approach.

Answer: A

══════════

The correct answer is C — The team should have conducted more demonstrations with the product owner during the iteration.

Continuous feedback is essential in Agile. Regular product demos or interim check-ins during the sprint (not just at the end) allow the product owner to validate progress and course-correct early. This ensures that expectations are aligned and surprises are avoided at the sprint review.

PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Stakeholder feedback should be gathered continuously throughout the sprint. Regular engagement and interim demos reduce the risk of misalignment at iteration end.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.7 – Reviews and Demos)

Mike Griffiths:

“Waiting until the sprint review to validate features with the product owner increases risk. Frequent collaboration and demonstrations ensure the work remains on target.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 3 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Incorrect options:

A is helpful but doesn't guarantee alignment.

B is testing-focused and misses early collaboration.

D places all responsibility on the product owner, ignoring shared ownership.

Answer: C

This approach reinforces the core values of agile, particularly the idea that a self-managed team should be collaborative and support one another. The agile lead should focus on creating a safe environment where team members feel comfortable sharing challenges and asking for help. This will not only help the junior team member but also improve the overall team dynamics and performance by fostering a culture of openness and mutual support.

In this scenario, the development team is working closely with different business units to deliver value early and often. This aligns with the agile value of delivering working software frequently, with a preference for shorter timescales. By collaborating with business units, the team is enabling early feedback and adapting to changing requirements, which is a core principle of agile methodologies like Scrum.

A product roadmap is a strategic plan that outlines the vision for the product, the business objectives that need to be achieved, and the timeframes for delivering key milestones or features. It provides a high-level overview of the product's development, aligning the team and stakeholders on the product's direction and the expected delivery timeline.

Product vision defines what the product aims to achieve and the value it will deliver to customers or the business.

Business objectives outline what the product aims to accomplish in terms of business impact, like increasing revenue or improving customer satisfaction.

Timeframes indicate when key milestones or releases are planned to occur, ensuring that progress can be tracked and expectations set.

This high-level structure is essential for guiding product development and keeping stakeholders aligned, without delving into the specific details of design or project management, which are more suited for other planning documents.

In an Agile environment, fostering a culture of collaboration and effective communication is key to success, especially when working with a diverse team. By creating a shared vision, the project manager aligns the team towards common goals, which helps reduce misunderstandings. Using techniques to increase empathy and positive interaction ensures that team members understand and respect each other's different perspectives. This approach promotes a collaborative environment where diverse ideas can be valued and conflicts can be addressed constructively.

In agile, work is considered “done” only when it meets the agreed-uponDefinition of Done (DoD), which includes all aspects like coding, review, testing, and documentation. If there's disagreement about completion, thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.3 Sprint Review and Acceptance)recommends revisiting and aligning the DoD between the team and product owner.

Mike Griffiths in hisPMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery)explains that without aclear and shared Definition of Done, misunderstandings about completion status can occur, especially with quality-related tasks like testing.

Option Ais correct because aligning on the DoD resolves current and future misunderstandings.

Option Bintroduces unnecessary escalation.

Option Cpostpones resolution and does not solve the core issue.

Option Dincorrectly assumes testing isn’t part of the story’s completion criteria.

The correct answer is D – Develop and distribute a high-level summary of how Agile offers greater benefits than predictive to the organization's executive directors, and if executive directors agree with the summary, distribute it organization-wide.

Cultural change must be supported from the top. Executive buy-in is crucial for any organizational transformation. Agile coaches work with leadership to promote Agile values, educate key decision-makers, and cascade change throughout the organization in a structured and supported way.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Cultural change requires executive sponsorship. Coaches must engage with senior leadership to build understanding, alignment, and support before broader rollout.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 2.1 – Introducing Agile)

Mike Griffiths confirms:

“Agile adoption is most effective when leadership embraces its principles. Change must be seeded and supported at the executive level before diffusing to teams.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 2 – Agile Mindset)

Other options:

A gives control to mid-management, which may hinder transformation.

B misdirects effort (vendors, not coaching focus).

C risks premature deployment without leadership support.

Answer: D

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

The correct answer is D – Write tests that will be used to know when a story has been correctly developed. This practice aligns with Test-Driven Development (TDD) and Acceptance Test-Driven Development (ATDD), which are common in agile environments. Agile promotes defining “done” through clear acceptance criteria and tests before coding begins.

From PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams use test-first practices, such as TDD or ATDD, where acceptance tests are written before development begins. This ensures that functionality is built to meet agreed expectations.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.5 – Agile Testing and Quality Strategies)

From Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book:

“Defining acceptance criteria or tests before development is a core agile practice. It ensures the team understands what success looks like and builds quality in from the start.”

(Mike Griffiths, Chapter 6 – Problem Detection and Resolution)

Option A may be useful but is unrelated to the new requirements.

Option B is not standard—customers help define acceptance criteria but rarely write tests.

Option C skips an important quality control step and doesn’t align with test-first practices.

Answer: D

────────────────────────────────────────────

The correct answer is A – Add a task to the product backlog to allow the team time to investigate and experiment prior to estimating.

When the team lacks experience or clarity around a new feature or technical solution, they should perform a time-boxed research activity, known as a spike. Spikes allow the team to explore unknowns, validate assumptions, and gather information needed to provide accurate estimates.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“When the team is unable to estimate due to uncertainty, a spike can be added to the backlog. This allows time for research, experimentation, or prototyping to enable informed estimation.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Adaptive Planning)

Mike Griffiths also writes:

“Spikes are used to investigate technical or functional elements. A spike helps reduce uncertainty and informs future planning and estimation.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Why other options are less effective:

B (Wideband Delphi), C (Planning Poker), and D (Three-point estimation) are techniques for estimation, not suitable when the team lacks enough information to estimate in the first place.

Answer: A

══════════════════════════════════════════════════