PMI PMP - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project team and ensuring that the team members are motivated, engaged, and productive. One of the tools and techniques for managing the project team is interpersonal and team skills, which include communication, conflict management, emotional intelligence, feedback, influence, mentoring, and motivation. When a team member feels demotivated and excluded from the team, the project manager should first use their interpersonal and team skills to speak with the team member and understand the root cause of their dissatisfaction. The project manager should also acknowledge the team member’s contributions and provide constructive feedback and guidance to help them improve their performance and engagement. This will help the team member feel valued, respected, and supported by the project manager and the team. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 349-350, 355-356.

 This is the best option because it addresses the root cause of the problem, which is the unclear product requirements. By analyzing the problem with both teams, the project leader can facilitate communication, collaboration, and alignment between them. This can help to clarify the product vision, prioritize the backlog, and identify any gaps or errors in the work done so far. This can also help to improve the quality of the product and the satisfaction of the stakeholders.

The other options are not as effective because they do not address the underlying issue or they may create more problems. For example:

B. Selecting new team members may disrupt the existing team dynamics and introduce more uncertainty and confusion. It may also delay the project and increase the cost.

C. Demanding that the business team define final requirements may create conflict and resentment between the teams. It may also be unrealistic or impractical to expect final requirements in a complex and changing environment.

D. Telling the teams to continue following the initial plan may result in wasted time and resources, as well as low-quality outcomes. It may also ignore the feedback and learning from the previous sprints.

A minimum viable product (MVP) is a product with the minimum features that can deliver value to the customer and validate the product concept1. To estimate the cost of an MVP, the project manager can use agile methods such as user story points and forecasting. User story points are a relative measure of the size and complexity of a user story, which is a description of a feature from the user’s perspective2. Forecasting is a technique that uses historical data and trends to project future outcomes3. By estimating the user story points for each feature of the MVP and using forecasting to calculate the time and resources needed, the project manager can report a realistic and accurate budget for the MVP. This approach is more suitable than the other options because:

B. Determining the control accounts and using a top bottom estimate is a traditional method that is more applicable to large and complex projects with well-defined scope and requirements. It involves breaking down the project into smaller units and estimating the cost of each unit from the top level to the bottom level. This method may not be flexible enough to accommodate the changes and uncertainties that are common in MVP development.

C. Considering the cost performance index (CPI) based on earned value (EV) divided by costs is a method that is used to measure the efficiency of the project performance. It compares the value of the work completed with the actual cost incurred. This method is not relevant for estimating the cost of an MVP, as it requires the project to be already in progress and have a baseline plan to compare with.

D. Calculating the budget at completion (BAC) based on the completed and planned features is a method that is used to estimate the total cost of the project at the end of its life cycle. It involves adding up the actual cost of the work done and the estimated cost of the remaining work. This method is not appropriate for estimating the cost of an MVP, as it assumes that the scope and features of the project are fixed and known in advance, which is not the case for MVP development.

The conflict described is a communication issue within the team. According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the key roles of a project manager is to manage team dynamics and resolve conflicts. In this case, reviewing the ground rules for collaboration within the team can help remind team members of the expected behaviors and communication norms, which can help resolve the issue. Moving a team member to a different team (Option A) may not solve the underlying issue, reporting to supervisors (Option C) may escalate the situation unnecessarily, and modifying the communications management plan (Option D) may not directly address the interpersonal conflict. References: Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Guide, 6th Edition, Section 9.5.2.1: Conflict Management

Adaptive leadership is a practical leadership framework that helps individuals and organizations adapt and thrive in challenging environments. It is being able, both individually and collectively, to take on the gradual but meaningful process of adaptation. It is about diagnosing the essential from the expendable and bringing about a real challenge to the status quo1. A team lead who is highly engaged and involved in a project and is operating without a chain of command or authority levels is demonstrating adaptive leadership by anticipating future needs, articulating those needs to build collective support and understanding, adapting their responses based on continuous learning, and demonstrating accountability through transparency in their decision-making process1.

The other options are not correct because they do not match the description of the team lead. Directive leadership is a style of leadership that involves giving clear and specific instructions to the followers and expecting them to follow them without question2. Commanding leadership is a style of leadership that involves exerting control and authority over the followers and demanding compliance and obedience3. Servant leadership is a style of leadership that involves putting the needs and interests of the followers first and empowering them to grow and develop4. None of these styles reflect the team lead’s behavior of being highly engaged and involved in the project and operating without a chain of command or authority levels. References: 1 5 Principles to Guide Adaptive Leadership, Harvard Business Review2 Directive Leadership Style: Definition, Examples, Pros & Cons, Indeed3 Commanding Leadership Style: Definition, Examples, Pros & Cons, Indeed4 Transformational versus Servant Leadership: A Difference in Leader Focus, Regent University.

nager should also help the stakeholders understand how the agile principles and practices affect the project’s reporting and metrics2. The project manager should explain that agile reporting focuses on delivering value, responding to change, and satisfying customer needs3. The project manager should also collaborate with the stakeholders to identify the most relevant and meaningful reports and KPIs for the agile project, such as velocity, burn-up or burn-down charts, sprint or product backlog, and customer feedback. References:

1: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 10.1.3.1

2: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 1.2.3

3: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 1.2.2

: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 1.2.4

A RAM is a tool that maps the project work packages or activities to the project team members or roles. It helps to define and assign the responsibilities, accountabilities, and authorities of each team member for each project task. It also helps to identify and resolve any gaps, overlaps, or conflicts in the resource allocation. A RAM can be presented in various formats, such as a RACI chart, a RASCI chart, or a linear responsibility chart12.

Developing an approved RAM can help the project manager to manage the team effectively, especially when some team members, such as the site engineers, may not be fully focused on the project due to other priorities or constraints. A RAM can help the project manager to communicate and clarify the expectations and deliverables of each team member, and to monitor and control their performance and progress. A RAM can also help the project manager to coordinate and collaborate with the other stakeholders, such as the production managers, to ensure that the project and the production imperatives are aligned and balanced34.

The other options are not as effective or relevant for managing the team:

B. Commit each team member’s time and deliverables and aim for overall project completion: Committing each team member’s time and deliverables is important, but it may not be sufficient or realistic to manage the team, especially when some team members, such as the site engineers, may have competing or conflicting demands on their time and attention. Aiming for overall project completion is a desirable goal, but it may not be achievable or sustainable without proper planning, communication, and coordination among the team members and the other stakeholders.

C. Continue the project implementation without the site engineers to ensure the schedule is maintained: Continuing the project implementation without the site engineers may not be feasible or advisable, as the site engineers may have critical skills, knowledge, or experience that are essential for the project success. Excluding the site engineers from the project may also create risks, issues, or gaps in the project quality, scope, or integration. Moreover, it may damage the relationship and trust between the project manager and the site engineers, and reduce their motivation and commitment to the project.

D. Contract external resources to fulfill the role of the site engineers who cannot sup-port the project: Contracting external resources may be an option to supplement or replace the internal resources, such as the site engineers, who cannot support the project. However, this option may not be the best or the first choice, as it may involve additional costs, time, or risks for the project. Contracting external resources may also require approval, negotiation, or procurement processes that may delay or complicate the project. Furthermore, it may affect the morale, loyalty, or performance of the internal resources, who may feel threatened, replaced, or undervalued by the external resources.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing changes and ensuring that they are aligned with the project objectives and scope. One of the tools and techniques for managing changes is change control tools, which include a change log, a change management system, and a configuration management system. When a change request is received, the project manager should use these tools to record, track, and approve or reject the change request. In addition, the project manager should also update the project documents and plans that are affected by the change request. One of the project documents that may need to be updated is the product backlog, which is a prioritized list of features and requirements that the project team delivers in sprints. The product backlog is a dynamic document that can change as the project progresses and new information is discovered. Therefore, the project manager should facilitate the update of the product backlog to reflect the change request and ensure that the project team and the project sponsor are on the same page regarding the project scope and deliverables. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 115-116, 123-124, 541-542.

The project charter is a document that formally authorizes a project or a phase and documents initial requirements that satisfy the stakeholder’s needs and expectations. It provides the project manager with the authority to apply organizational resources to project activities. When a new project manager is assigned to a project, they should refer to the project charter to understand the project objectives, key stakeholders, risks, and the authority delegated to them. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials12.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, project completion involves verifying that all the project deliverables meet the acceptance criteria and obtaining formal acceptance from the customer. Sometimes, the customer may request changes or modifications to the deliverables, which may affect the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality. In such cases, the project manager should negotiate with the customer to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement that balances the project objectives and the customer expectations. Negotiation is the process of conferring with others to come to terms with them or reach an agreement. The first step in negotiation is to analyze the bounds of the negotiation, which means to identify the best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA), the worst alternative to a negotiated agreement (WATNA), and the zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) for both parties. BATNA is the most advantageous alternative course of action a party can take if negotiations fail and an agreement cannot be reached. WATNA is the worst outcome that a party can expect if negotiations fail. ZOPA is the range of possible outcomes within which an agreement can be reached by both parties. By analyzing the bounds of the negotiation, the project manager can determine the minimum and maximum acceptable outcomes for both parties, and use them as a reference point for making offers and counteroffers. This can help the project manager to avoid deadlock, impasse, or unfavorable outcomes, and to achieve a win-win situation. Therefore, option A is the best answer. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 4: Project Integration Management, pages 123-124

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 12: Project Procurement Management, pages 481-482

PMP Exam Questions | 100% Free PMP Example Questions

According to the PMBOK® Guide, an agile coach is a person who guides, mentors, teaches, and facilitates a team in adopting and improving agile practices and principles. The agile coach should also foster a culture of collaboration, trust, feedback, and continuous improvement within the team. When a team member is openly criticized by others during a standup meeting, the agile coach should intervene and address the situation as soon as possible. The agile coach should emphasize the ground rules of the standup meeting, such as respecting each other, being supportive, and focusing on the work. The agile coach should then redirect the attention of the team to today’s activities and impediments, and help them find solutions and remove blockers. This way, the agile coach can prevent the conflict from escalating, maintain a positive team atmosphere, and ensure the team’s progress and alignment. Letting the discussion go on, addressing the team members involved during the next sprint retrospective, or avoiding the discussion by referring to the team charter are not effective ways to deal with the situation. These options may ignore, postpone, or evade the issue, which could harm the team’s morale, performance, and relationships. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 52, 335, 540-541.

Graphical user interface, application, table Description automatically generated

According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager should ensure that the project benefits are aligned with the business objectives and the needs of the intended users1. One of the best ways to achieve this is to conduct a review with a representative group of users who can provide feedback on the program’s functionality, usability, and value2. This can help the project manager validate the program’s benefits, identify any gaps or issues, and implement any changes or improvements before releasing the program to the public3.

Option A is not the best answer because testing the program only ensures its quality, but not its benefits. Testing the program may reveal technical errors or defects, but it may not capture the user’s perspective or satisfaction4. Option C is not the best answer because meeting with government officials may ensure the program’s compliance, but not its benefits. Meeting with government officials may help the project manager understand the policy requirements and regulations, but it may not reflect the user’s expectations or preferences5. Option D is not the best answer because documenting the features and updating the specifications only ensures the program’s scope, but not its benefits. Documenting the features and updating the specifications may help the project manager control the program’s deliverables, but it may not measure the program’s outcomes or value6. References: 1 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 332 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 1503 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 1234 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 2875 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 396 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 141.

The project manager should update the risk register next. The risk register is a document that records the identified risks, their causes, impacts, probabilities, responses, owners, and other relevant information. Updating the risk register is part of the Monitor Risks process, which involves tracking the identified risks, monitoring residual risks, identifying new risks, executing risk responses, and evaluating their effectiveness. In this scenario, the low availability of the testing facility is a potential risk that could affect the project schedule. Therefore, the project manager should update the risk register with this information and plan appropriate risk responses. This option aligns with the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, which states that “the risk register is updated as outputs from other risk management processes are completed” (p. 436). The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the risk of the testing facility’s low availability. Updating the issue log (option B) is not appropriate because the issue log is a document that records and monitors the resolution of issues that have occurred or are currently occurring on the project. In this case, the low availability of the testing facility is not an issue yet, but a potential risk that may or may not occur in the future. Updating the lessons learned register (option C) is not relevant because the lessons learned register is a document that captures the knowledge gained from the project, including the challenges, problems, risks, and opportunities encountered and how they were addressed. In this scenario, the project manager has not yet learned any lessons from the testing facility’s low availability, as it is still a potential risk. Updating the project schedule (option D) is premature because the project schedule is a document that presents the planned dates for performing activities and meeting milestones. In this case, the project manager has not yet determined the impact or probability of the testing facility’s low availability, or the risk responses to deal with it. Therefore, updating the project schedule without this information may result in inaccurate or unrealistic estimates. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 436 1

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 123 2

The project manager should not ignore the new regulation, as it may affect the quality, scope, and compliance of the software. Nor should the project manager bypass the sponsor’s authority and include the new requirement without approval. The project manager should also not release the software as is and start a new project, as this may create unnecessary rework, waste, and risk. The best option is to collect the requirements of the regulation and follow the change control process, which involves analyzing the impact of the change, obtaining approval from the sponsor and other stakeholders, and updating the project management plan and baselines accordingly. This way, the project manager can ensure that the software meets the customer’s needs and expectations, as well as the legal and regulatory requirements. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 4.6.1, page 113

PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Guide, 2nd edition, section 5.3, page 87

To answer this question, we need to consider which option would best help the project team understand how to deliver the project’s scope, given the limited time available with the SME. Option A, asking the SME to review the scope for alignment with the project charter, might be helpful, but it would not directly address the team’s challenges. Option B, organizing a mentoring session with the team and the SME, might be beneficial, but it would depend on the quality and relevance of the mentoring. Option D, reviewing the project scope statement with the SME, might be redundant, as the project scope statement should already be clear and agreed upon by all stakeholders.

Option C, meeting with the SME to discuss the current challenges the team is facing, seems to be the best choice. This option would allow the project manager to leverage the SME’s expertise and experience to provide guidance and solutions for the team. It would also enable the project manager to communicate the project’s scope, goals, and deliverables to the SME, and get feedback and suggestions on how to improve them. This option would also foster collaboration and trust between the project team and the SME, which could lead to better project outcomes.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, a project manager should be able to lead and support the team in adapting to the changing environment and emerging opportunities. This includes providing coaching and mentoring to the team members, especially when they are transitioning from a predictive to an agile approach. The project manager should also facilitate team training and development, and foster a positive team culture that embraces agility and collaboration. Creating an agile conduct guideline or providing directions to the team members may not be sufficient or effective in addressing the knowledge gaps and changing the culture. Replacing the key team members with new resources may be disruptive and costly, and may not guarantee the success of the transformation. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 52-53, 334-335.

The project manager should first assess the impact of the layoff on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. The project sponsor is the person who provides the resources and support for the project and is accountable for enabling success1. Therefore, the project manager should request a meeting with the project sponsor to discuss the viability of the project and determine the next actions, such as revising the project plan, securing additional resources, or terminating the project. This is the best option among the given choices.

Option B is not the best answer because the project manager should not discuss trade-offs with the customer without consulting the project sponsor first. The project sponsor is the one who authorizes any changes to the project scope or quality1.

Option C is not the best answer because the project manager should not request a meeting with the finance department to increase the budget without consulting the project sponsor first. The project sponsor is the one who approves the project budget and any changes to it1.

Option D is not the best answer because the project manager should not request a meeting with the HR department and demand they find a solution to retain the project team members. This is not a realistic or respectful way to handle the situation. The project manager should work with the project sponsor and the HR department to find the best possible solution for the project and the affected team members2. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.1.2, Project Sponsor Role and Responsibilities 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 9.1.3, Develop Team: Tools and Techniques

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 5.3.2, in an agile product development environment, the project manager should facilitate communication and collaboration among the teams, especially when they are geographically dispersed. The project manager should also ensure that the teams follow a relay pattern of handing off work from one team to the other, which means that each team completes its work and passes it on to the next team in a timely and efficient manner. This way, the teams can deliver the sprints with high quality and customer satisfaction. The project manager should not isolate the teams, ignore the communication issues, or avoid the risks, as these actions would jeopardize the success of the project. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 5.3.2, page 157-158

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition

PMP Exam Content Outline

 According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the key inputs to the develop project team process is the training needs assessment, which identifies the gaps between the current and desired competencies of the project team members1. The project manager should assess the training requirements and ensure time for professional development training by senior members, as this is a way of enhancing the skills and knowledge of the team members, improving their performance, and increasing their motivation and satisfaction2. This option is also aligned with the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Guide, which states that the business analyst should identify and address the training needs of the project team and stakeholders3. The other options are not appropriate, as they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of experience and competence of the team members. Increasing the overall project duration may not improve the quality of the project deliverables, and may also increase the project costs and risks. Replacing or removing team members may not be feasible or desirable, as it may disrupt the team dynamics, cause resentment, and create additional work for the project manager. Moreover, these options do not consider the potential of the team members to learn and grow in their roles. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 3492: Project Team Training: Proven Key to Organizational Teamwork43: Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Guide, 2nd edition, page 97.

 The question describes a situation where the project is in the execution phase and the team has identified dependencies and risks. Additionally, there are questions about acceptance testing and training activities. This suggests that there are multiple factors that need to be tracked and managed. Option B, which suggests creating a log to track risks, assumptions, issues, and dependencies and establishing a periodic review with the stakeholders, is the most appropriate response. This approach ensures that all important aspects are monitored and managed, and that stakeholders are kept informed, which is a key aspect of effective project management. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Section 11.2: Identify Risks

The project manager should mentor the team to explain agile principles and create a shared understanding. This will help the team to adopt an agile mindset, embrace the values and practices of agile approaches, and collaborate effectively throughout the project. The project manager should also provide feedback, coaching, and support to the team as they learn and apply agile methods. Evaluating the possibility of managing this project using a predictive approach, submitting a change request for a new team, and hiring a functional manager are not appropriate actions to address the situation, as they do not address the root cause of the confusion or help the team to develop agile competencies. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18-19, 27-28, 555-556; [Agile Practice Guide], pages 8-9, 13-14, 27-28; PMP Exam Content Outline, 2020, pages 6-7.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should consider the culture of the organization when choosing a leadership style for a project. The culture of the organization includes its values, norms, beliefs, and expectations that influence how people behave and interact. Different cultures may have different preferences and expectations for leadership styles, such as autocratic, democratic, participative, or laissez-faire. The project manager should adapt their leadership style to the culture of the organization to ensure effective communication, collaboration, and motivation of the project team and stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 53.

The RFP is a document that solicits proposals from potential suppliers by describing the project scope, requirements, and evaluation criteria. It is important to ensure that the RFP is clear, accurate, and legally sound to avoid misunderstandings, conflicts, and disputes with the suppliers. Asking the legal team to review the RFP can help the project manager mitigate this risk by ensuring that the RFP complies with the relevant laws, regulations, and contractual terms, and that it protects the interests and rights of both parties12.

The other options are not as effective or relevant for mitigating this risk:

B. Ask the project team to submit the RFP: The project team may not have the necessary expertise or authority to prepare or approve the RFP. Asking the project team to submit the RFP may result in delays, errors, or inconsistencies in the RFP, which could increase the risk of disputes with the suppliers3.

C. Request approval of the RFP from the project sponsor: The project sponsor is the person or group who provides the financial resources and support for the project. The project sponsor may not be directly involved in the procurement process or have the legal knowledge to review the RFP. Requesting approval of the RFP from the project sponsor may not address the risk of disputes with the suppliers, and may also create unnecessary bureaucracy or dependency.

D. Request approval of the RFP from management: Management is the group of individuals who direct and control the organization. Management may not have the time, interest, or expertise to review the RFP. Requesting approval of the RFP from management may not mitigate the risk of disputes with the suppliers, and may also cause delays, conflicts, or micromanagement.

According to the PMBOK Guide1, a hybrid approach is a combination of predictive and adaptive (agile) methodologies that suits the needs and context of a project. A hybrid approach can provide flexibility, customer satisfaction, and risk management benefits. However, it also requires a high level of collaboration, communication, and alignment among the project stakeholders, especially the sponsor and the team. Therefore, the project manager should train the marketing team on the hybrid approach and keep their director informed of the progress, benefits, and challenges of using it. This way, the project manager can ensure that the team is competent and confident in applying the hybrid approach, and that the director is aware and supportive of the new direction. The project manager can also use this opportunity to address any concerns or resistance from the director and demonstrate the value of the hybrid approach for the project and the organization.

The other options are not as effective as option C. Option A is not realistic, as the marketing director may not have the time or interest to receive formal training on the hybrid approach. Option B is not respectful, as the marketing team members are not in a position to coach their director. Option D is not appropriate, as the project manager is not the director’s mentor and cannot assume that role without the director’s consent and agreement. References: 1 PMBOK Guide, Seventh Edition, Chapter 2: Value Delivery System, Section 2.3: Tailoring the Delivery Approach, Page 38.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the agile principles is to “prioritize work that delivers the most value”. This means that the project manager should help the team and the product owner to rank the requirements in order of importance and urgency, rather than using vague categories such as high, medium, and low. A numerical prioritization system, such as the MoSCoW method (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won’t have) or the 100-point method, can help the team to focus on the most valuable features and avoid confusion and ambiguity. This also aligns with the agile value of “responding to change over following a plan”, as the team can adjust the priority of the requirements based on the feedback and changes from the stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, …

The project manager should determine the critical requirements to bridge the gap and ensure the project delivers the expected business value. This is because the project manager is dealing with a new and innovative solution that may have unclear or ambiguous scope and expectations. The project manager should review the RFP and identify the key terms and conditions that define the project objectives, deliverables, and constraints. The project manager should also engage with the customer and other stakeholders to elicit, analyze, and prioritize the requirements that are essential for the project success. The project manager should ensure that the critical requirements are aligned with the project vision, scope, and business value, and that they address the compliance issues that may arise in the project context. The project manager should not document the risks and mitigations, as this would be a subsequent step after determining the critical requirements. The project manager should not define the project schedule, as this would be a premature and risky action without having a clear understanding of the project scope and requirements. The project manager should not create a project scope statement, as this would be a formal document that requires the approval of the customer and other stakeholders, and that may not be feasible or appropriate for a new and innovative solution. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 5.2, “Collect Requirements”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 5.3, “Define Scope”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 5.4, “Create WBS”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 5.6, “Control Scope”

An agile approach is suitable for projects with unstable or changing requirements, as it allows for frequent feedback and adaptation. By refining and prioritizing the requirements according to the project objectives, the project manager can ensure that the most valuable features are delivered to the customer in an iterative and incremental manner. This can also increase the stakeholder satisfaction and engagement with the project. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.2.2.3, page 141

PMI Agile Practice Guide, section 2.1, page 9

Free PMP Practice Exam Questions - 120 Sample Test Questions, question 18

 The project manager should reinforce the value of documenting and approving all change requests and ask the customer to issue these through the agreed channels. This is because change requests are formal proposals to modify any aspect of the project and should follow the change management plan, which defines how changes will be monitored, controlled, and approved. The project manager should also communicate with the project team member and remind them of the change management process and their roles and responsibilities. This will help prevent unauthorized changes that could impact the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risk. The project manager should also update the issue log and the lessons learned register to document the incident and the actions taken. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.1, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Inputs”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.3.1, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Outputs - Change Requests”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.3.2, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Outputs - Project Management Plan Updates”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.3.3, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Outputs - Project Documents Updates”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.3.1, “Trace Requirements: Inputs”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.3.2, “Trace Requirements: Tools and Techniques”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.3.3, “Trace Requirements: Outputs”

A team charter is a document that defines the purpose, objectives, roles, and norms of a project team. It helps to align the team members’ expectations, clarify their responsibilities, and foster collaboration and trust. A team charter is an output of the Develop Team process, which involves improving the competencies and interactions of team members to enhance project performance1. A project charter is a document that authorizes the project and defines its high-level scope, objectives, and constraints. It is not focused on the team expectations or productivity. A stakeholder register is a document that identifies the project stakeholders and their interests, influence, and involvement in the project. It is not used to manage the team expectations or productivity. A project organization chart is a graphical representation of the project team members and their reporting relationships. It does not define the team expectations or productivity. References: 1 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 349.

The project manager should use the PMIS to share information with the new stakeholders, as this is the most effective and efficient way to communicate project information and ensure that everyone has access to the same level of detail. The PMIS is a tool that supports the project manager in performing the processes of project integration management, project communications management, and project stakeholder management. The PMIS can include software applications, web-based systems, databases, and other technologies that facilitate the collection, integration, analysis, and dissemination of project information. The PMIS can also help the project manager to monitor and control the project performance and status, as well as to manage changes and issues. The PMIS can also provide a platform for collaboration and feedback among the project team and stakeholders. By using the PMIS, the project manager can ensure that the new stakeholders are informed and engaged in the project, and that their concerns are addressed in a timely manner. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 89, 377, 523, 540.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, when a change request is received, the project manager should evaluate the impact of the change on the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and other aspects. The project manager should also consult with the project sponsor and other key stakeholders to obtain their approval or rejection of the change request. The project manager should not proceed with the change without proper analysis and authorization, nor should they reject the change without considering the legal and contractual implications. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 115-116, 134-135, 141-142.

 The project manager should work with the team to analyze which processes are suitable to use and define them in the ground rules. This will help to resolve the conflict by creating a common understanding of the project processes, expectations, and norms among the team members from different companies. The project manager should also facilitate communication and collaboration among the team members and foster a positive team culture. Avoiding the conflict, reviewing the historical information, and asking the team to use company B’s processes are not effective ways to resolve the conflict, as they do not address the root cause of the problem or involve the team in the decision-making process. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 48-49, 343-344, 368-369; PMP Exam Content Outline, 2020, pages 6-7.

According to the PMBOK Guide, a workstream is a logical grouping of project activities that produces a specific deliverable or sub-deliverable within a project. A workstream leader is the person who is responsible for planning, executing, monitoring, and controlling the workstream activities and deliverables. A functional manager is the person who has management authority over an organizational unit, such as a department, within a functional organization1.

In this scenario, the project manager faces a situation where one of the workstreams has missed its deadline multiple times, affecting the project schedule and performance. The project manager should speak to the workstream leader and the functional manager about this situation to ensure it does not happen again. The project manager should communicate with the workstream leader to understand the root causes of the delays, identify the risks and issues, and agree on the corrective and preventive actions. The project manager should also communicate with the functional manager to obtain the necessary resources, support, and guidance for the workstream leader and the workstream team. The project manager should facilitate the collaboration and coordination between the workstream leader and the functional manager to ensure the alignment of expectations, objectives, and deliverables1.

The other options are not as suitable as option C. Option A involves speaking to the workstream leader and the project sponsor. The project sponsor is the person or group who provides resources and support for the project and is accountable for enabling success1. However, the project sponsor is not directly involved in the management or execution of the workstream activities and deliverables. The project sponsor may not have the detailed knowledge or authority to address the specific issues or challenges faced by the workstream leader and the workstream team. Option B involves speaking to the workstream leader alone. This option may not be sufficient to resolve the situation, as the workstream leader may need the support and assistance of other managers or stakeholders to overcome the delays and improve the workstream performance. Option D involves speaking to the workstream leader and the project management office (PMO). The PMO is an organizational structure that standardizes the project-related governance processes and facilitates the sharing of resources, methodologies, tools, and techniques1. However, the PMO may not have the direct responsibility or authority over the workstream activities and deliverables. The PMO may not be able to provide the specific resources, support, or guidance needed by the workstream leader and the workstream team1.

A minimum viable product (MVP) is the most basic version of a new product with enough functionality and features to appeal to early adopters and validate the concept early in the product development cycle. The concept of an MVP comes from the Lean Startup methodology, which encourages learning and building with scalability in mind. According to its author, Eric Ries, an MVP is the version of a new product that allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least amount of effort. Building an MVP plays a central role in agile product development. It aligns with agile principles of releasing updates consistently, learning along the way, and prioritizing features based on user feedback. The benefits of focusing on an MVP and scaling it up may vary, but ultimately the purpose is to provide a low-risk testing ground before you invest thousands (or millions!) of dollars into a product before it’s ready to sell. MVP testing can provide cost savings, insights into user-centered design, fast business launches, and even getting early investor buy-in. The insights and investment you’ll reap early on will help you build the dream product you and your customers have been looking for. Therefore, the project manager should support the team to find and execute the MVP, as this will help them deliver value to the customers, test their assumptions, and make iterative improvements based on feedback. This will also reduce the risk of wasting time and resources on features that are not needed or desired by the customers. The other options are not as effective as the MVP approach. Encouraging and motivating the team with project incentives may boost their morale, but it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the scope and complexity of the project. Subdividing the team to handle different aspects of the project may improve the division of labor, but it does not ensure that the team is working on the right features or that they are aligned with the customer needs. Organizing project execution to satisfy the project sponsor’s request may seem like a good way to meet the expectations of the stakeholder, but it may also lead to over-engineering the product and delivering a solution that is not validated by the market. References:

Understanding the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) in Agile Project Management

MVPs and MBIs - Project Management Institute

Minimum Viable Product (MVP): What is it & Why it Matters - Atlassian

According to the Agile Practice Guide, one of the principles of agile project management is to "build projects around motivated individuals. Give them the environment and support they need and trust them to get the job done."1 Therefore, the project manager should not ignore, punish, or override the team member who has a different opinion, but rather try to understand their perspective and work with them to reach a consensus. This can foster a positive team culture and improve the quality of the sprint goals. References: 1: Agile Practice Guide, page 10.

The probable reason for the difficulty in conducting the entrepreneurship training is that the project did not identify and engage the correct stakeholders. Stakeholders are individuals, groups, or organizations that may affect, be affected by, or perceive themselves to be affected by a decision, activity, or outcome of a project1. Stakeholder identification and engagement are essential processes for ensuring the success of a project, as they help to understand the needs, expectations, interests, and influence of the stakeholders, and to manage their involvement and communication throughout the project life cycle2. In this case, the local municipal governments are key stakeholders, as they have the authority to approve or reject the training activities in their towns. The project manager should have identified them as such, and engaged them appropriately to obtain their support and cooperation. By failing to do so, the project manager created a risk that could jeopardize the project implementation and objectives. References:

1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 13: Project Stakeholder Management, page 513.

2: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 2: Needs Assessment, page 17.

 In a hybrid project life cycle, which combines elements of both traditional (predictive) and agile (adaptive) methodologies, empowering the team to self-organize and make their own decisions is often the most effective approach. This is particularly true in situations where requirements are continuously changing, as it allows the team to adapt more quickly and effectively. In this scenario, the project manager should empower the team to advance the stones without waiting for his or her approval, thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of the testing process. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Section 3.1.3 - Life Cycle Description: Predictive, Iterative, Incremental, and Agile

According to the PMBOK Guide, planning poker is a technique used to estimate the size of user stories in agile projects. It involves each team member privately selecting a card with a number that represents the relative size or complexity of a user story, and then revealing their choices simultaneously. The team then discusses the reasons for the differences and repeats the process until they reach a consensus or an acceptable range. This technique helps the team to avoid anchoring, groupthink, and estimation bias, and to consider different perspectives and assumptions. By continuing multiple rounds of planning poker, the team can improve the accuracy and reliability of their estimates and plan their iterations more effectively. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 309; Agile Estimation Techniques for the PMP Exam

 The project manager should raise a new issue in the issue log and convene SMEs and relevant stakeholders to identify alternatives to address the problem. This is because the inability of the subcontractor to supply a key component is an issue that has already occurred and needs to be resolved as soon as possible. The issue log is a tool for documenting and monitoring the resolution of issues that arise during a project1. The project manager should also involve the SMEs and relevant stakeholders who have the expertise and authority to provide input and guidance on how to deal with the issue. The project manager should not discuss the issue with the project sponsor and request extra time and budget to obtain the component from a different supplier, as this would be premature and may not be the best option. The project manager should not raise a new risk in the risk register, perform a risk assessment, and convene SMEs and relevant stakeholders to plan a risk response, as this would be appropriate for a potential problem that has not yet occurred, not an actual issue that has already happened. The project manager should not submit a change request to the CCB for changes to the performance measurement baseline to obtain the component from a different supplier, as this would be a formal process that requires approval and may not be necessary if the issue can be resolved in other ways. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.1.1, “Issue Log”

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project team and resolving any conflicts that may arise among team members. The project manager should use appropriate conflict resolution techniques, such as problem-solving, compromising, or collaborating, to identify the root causes of the issues and guide the team members toward a mutually acceptable solution. Removing one of the team members, warning them about their behavior, or training them on communication techniques and interpersonal behavior are not effective ways of handling this situation, as they do not address the underlying problems or foster a positive team environment. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 223-224; PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 349-350.

 The project manager should evaluate the current effectiveness of the team and define development needs. This is the best option because it allows the project manager to identify the gaps in the team’s skills and knowledge, as well as the opportunities for improvement and learning. By evaluating the team’s performance, the project manager can also provide feedback, recognition, and support to the team members, as well as foster a positive team culture. This option also aligns with the PMBOK® Guide’s guidance on managing project team, which includes assessing team members’ skills, providing training, and enhancing team competencies1.

The other options are not as effective as option B. Option A is not the project manager’s responsibility and may undermine the team’s autonomy and trust. Option C is not realistic and may lead to poor quality and inefficiency. Option D is not flexible and may ignore the team’s preferences and potential. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 349

The project manager should choose a hybrid approach for this project, as this is a combination of predictive and adaptive (or agile) approaches that can be tailored to suit the project’s characteristics and requirements. A hybrid approach allows the project manager to apply different methods and practices to different phases or deliverables of the project, depending on the level of uncertainty, complexity, and change involved. For example, the project manager can use a predictive approach for the research part of the project, where the scope, schedule, and cost are well-defined and stable, and an agile approach for the delivery part of the project, where the scope, schedule, and cost are flexible and iterative, and the customer feedback is incorporated frequently. The other options are not the best choices for this project, as they do not reflect the diversity and variability of the project’s nature and context. References:

[PMBOK Guide], 7th edition, pages 14-15, 18-19, 22-23.

[Agile Practice Guide], pages 8-9, 12-13, 16-17.